Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.447
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Masyarakat Madani Indonesia Priviet Social Sciences Journal Science and Education Journal Jurnal Kelautan dan Perikanan Indonesia International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice International Journal of Sociology and Law
Dahlan Dahlan
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Teaching Religious Moderation through Literature a Teaching-Oriented Reading of Yusuf Azeem is Not a Hero Dahlan Dahlan
FOSTER: Journal of English Language Teaching Vol. 6 No. 4 (2025): FOSTER JELT
Publisher : Faculty of Education and Teacher Training of UIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/foster-jelt.v6i4.393

Abstract

In the contemporary global context, religious moderation has become an essential educational agenda, particularly in societies marked by religious diversity and historical trauma. Following the September 11, 2001 attacks, Islam and Muslim communities in the United States experienced intensified suspicion, stereotyping, and discrimination, commonly conceptualized as Islamophobia. This condition presents not only a social and political problem but also an educational challenge for universities seeking to promote tolerance, empathy, and peaceful coexistence (Allen, 2010). This teaching-oriented article examines how religious moderation can be taught through literary texts by analyzing Yusuf Azeem Is Not a Hero (2021) by Saadia Faruqi. Employing a qualitative descriptive method and the perspective of genetic structuralism, the study explores the relationship between the author’s social background as a Muslim American, the post-9/11 socio-historical context, and the novel’s narrative strategies in responding to Islamophobia. The analysis reveals that the novel embodies core values of religious moderation, including moral exemplarity, courage in articulating religious identity, tolerance and interfaith interaction, and literature as a medium of peacebuilding. By reconstructing the analysis into a pedagogical framework, this article demonstrates that literature can function as an effective learning resource for teaching religious moderation in higher education. The findings contribute to literary studies, religious education, and curriculum development by positioning fiction as a transformative tool for countering religious prejudice and fostering inclusive citizenship.
“From Sea to Screen”: Government Digital Communication Strategies in Framing Maritime Security in the Riau Islands Irfan Harmain; Dian Mustika Intan; Dahlan Dahlan; Ria Anisa; Latifah Gusri
LEGAL BRIEF Vol. 14 No. 6 (2026): February: Law Science and Field
Publisher : IHSA Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/legal.v14i6.1559

Abstract

The strategic location of the Riau Islands Province places it at the frontline of Indonesia’s maritime security challenges, particularly in relation to transnational crime and border governance. In the digital era, local governments increasingly rely on digital communication to frame maritime security issues; however, the communicative construction of these narratives remains insufficiently examined. This study aims to analyze how the Riau Islands Provincial Government frames maritime security through digital communication strategies. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach using Robert N. Entman’s framing analysis. The data of the study comprises official digital communications produced by the Riau Islands Provincial Government, including selected social media posts, official website content, press releases, and policy-related digital materials on maritime security. Primary data were collected through in-depth interviews with representatives from government offices. Secondary data were collected through documentation, digital observation, and content archiving. Data were analyzed using Entman’s four framing dimensions: problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. The findings reveal that maritime security is predominantly framed as an issue of sovereignty and national identity rather than merely an economic or technical concern. Disruptions to maritime security are constructed through narratives of external transnational threats and internal coastal governance challenges, reinforced by moral values of patriotism and coastal solidarity. Policy solutions emphasize institutional synergy among maritime agencies and maritime legal education for coastal communities. This study concludes that digital communication effectively builds symbolic legitimacy for maritime security policies but remains largely top-down and representational. The findings imply the need for more inclusive and participatory digital governance to strengthen substantive public engagement in maritime security
Terancamnya Kebebsan Berpendapat di Era Digital Dahlan Dahlan; Yohana Ongge; Ronauli Siringo-Ringo; Jessica Kharin
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 4 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i4.8277

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan dan menganalisis bentuk pengaturan kebebasan berpendapat serta berekspresi di media sosial yang berlaku di Indonesia. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menilai sejauh mana pengaturan tersebut telah selaras dengan prinsip-prinsip perlindungan hak asasi manusia. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menelaah peraturan perundang-undangan, asas hukum, serta konsep-konsep yang relevan dengan isu yang dikaji. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebebasan masyarakat dalam menyampaikan pendapat merupakan hak fundamental yang harus dijamin dalam sistem negara demokratis, sekaligus menjadi tanggung jawab negara untuk melindunginya. Penerapan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik beserta perubahannya tidak seharusnya dipahami sebagai instrumen untuk membatasi secara berlebihan kebebasan berekspresi warga negara. Sebaliknya, negara berkewajiban memastikan bahwa pengaturan tersebut tetap menghormati dan melindungi hak asasi manusia melalui mekanisme yang proporsional, adil, dan tidak diskriminatif. Kritik yang ditujukan kepada pemerintah tidak dapat serta-merta dikategorikan sebagai pelanggaran hukum, karena kebebasan berpendapat dan berekspresi telah dijamin oleh konstitusi.
Legal study of court decisions regarding errors in requests for cancellation of standard clauses in financial services sector agreements Ninik Ayuhandika; Dahlan Dahlan; Athika Salsabilla Harahap; Rendie Meita Sarie Putri
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 6 No. 8 (2026): August 2026
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v6i8.1859

Abstract

Consumers (customers) who feel disadvantaged by the standard clauses in credit (financing) agreements with financial institutions can submit a request for cancellation of the standard clauses through the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency or Badan Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen (BPSK) and take legal action in the form of objections to the District Court and cassation to the Supreme Court. This study aims to describe, in detail and systematically, the legal reasons for consumers’ requests for cancellation of standard clauses and analyze the considerations of the panel of judges in decisions on requests for cancellation of standard clauses in financial services sector agreements. This study employs normative legal research with a descriptive approach. The approaches used include the statute, case, and conceptual approaches to the Cassation Decision Number 651 K/Pdt. Sus-BPSK/2013, District Court Decision No. 185/Pdt. Sus-BPSK/2016/PN-Rap and Cassation Decision No. 459 K/Pdt. Sus-BPSK/2017. Data were collected through literature and document studies and then qualitatively analyzed. The study’s results indicate that the request to annul the standard clause is based on the argument that the standard agreement made by business actors in the financial services sector contains a prohibited clause, as regulated in Article 18 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. However, in the three decisions, the panel of judges tended to qualify the dispute as a breach of contract or purely civil dispute, thus deeming the BPSK incompetent to examine and decide the case. This has implications for legal uncertainty regarding the limits of the BPSK's authority and the effectiveness of consumer protection in the financial services sector.
Co-Authors Aldi Junianto Andrean Nugrah Wijaya Andry Yosep Manalu Aqila Fikril Hakim Asmiati Ramli Athika Salsabilla Harahap Auliana Putri Batubara Darwis Anatami Debby Sharonly Thomas Dian Mustika Intan Dinda Herlinda Syharani Edy Chandra Zebua Eka Intan Kumala Putri Erlina B Fatmawada S Firman Rija Arhas H.M. Soerya Respationo Hadya Zuhra Helmawan Trintono Subekti Irfan Harmain Iskandar A. Gani Jessica Kharin Latifah Gusri Muhammad Habibi Al Fitri Ninik Ayuhandika Nurlansi Nurlansi Raja Zailani Rendie Meita Sarie Putri Ria Anisa Risa Arviana Rizki Nanda Ronauli Siringo-Ringo Saida Rasnovi Sayid Fadhil Tamaulina Br. Sembiring Tuti Arlita Yasmirah Mandasari Saragih Yohana Ongge