Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analysis of Funding Sources for PPDB Activities in Budget Management at Public Schools Nelly Rahmawati Ningsih; Asep Rahmat Kurnia; Syafitri Ningsih; Muhtadin Muhtadin; Yudi Kirmadi; Maman Suryaman
Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Vol 4, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Yayasan Keluarga Guru Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46843/jpm.v4i2.444

Abstract

Effective financial management in public schools plays a crucial role in sustaining educational services, particularly during the implementation of student admissions, which requires efficient and accountable planning and funding. However, the diversity of funding sources and the limited financial management capacity of schools remain persistent challenges. This study aims to describe the funding practices for PPDB and analyze the strategies used by public schools to optimize various financial sources. Employing a descriptive qualitative approach, data were collected using structured questionnaires distributed to principals and treasurers of several public schools. The data were analyzed thematically and presented in visual formats. Findings indicate that the five main funding sources for PPDB activities are BOS (School Operational Support), RKAS (School Budget and Activity Plans), school committee funds, local education office support, and parents' contributions. While BOS remains the most dominant source, schools are also making efforts to diversify funding. The study concludes that multi-source funding requires transparent, collaborative, and adaptive financial governance. This research contributes to the academic discourse by highlighting the need for managerial capacity building and digital-based financial systems in order to strengthen school-level education financing and ensure equity in educational service delivery.
OUTCOME-BASED EDUCATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM ADMINISTRATION: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW Siti Rahmah; Yayah Asiah Nurpadilah; Uus Kustiana; Maman Suryaman
ACADEMIA: Jurnal Inovasi Riset Akademik Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Pengembangan Pendidikan dan Penelitian Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51878/academia.v6i3.11190

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study aims to synthesize empirical and conceptual literature on the implementation of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) in higher education curriculum administration, with a focus on implementation practices, challenges, success factors, and implications for curriculum quality and accreditation. A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) guided by PRISMA 2020 was conducted using Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, and Google Scholar/Sinta databases. From 920 identified records, 38 articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The findings indicate that OBE is commonly implemented through outcome hierarchies, curriculum mapping, and constructive alignment supported by Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) processes. Major implementation challenges include resistance to change, limited staff capacity, and compliance-oriented practices. Successful implementation is associated with leadership commitment, stakeholder involvement, and effective use of learning management systems. Based on the synthesis, this study proposes Institutional Constructive Alignment (ICA) as a conceptual extension of constructive alignment that integrates curriculum design, quality assurance, and institutional governance. The study highlights the importance of aligning OBE implementation with curriculum management, accreditation requirements, and continuous quality improvement strategies in higher education. These findings provide practical guidance for university leaders, curriculum developers, and policymakers seeking sustainable OBE-based educational transformation. ABSTRAK Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mensintesis literatur empiris dan konseptual mengenai implementasi Outcome-Based Education (OBE) dalam administrasi kurikulum pendidikan tinggi, dengan fokus pada praktik implementasi, tantangan, faktor keberhasilan, serta implikasinya terhadap mutu kurikulum dan akreditasi. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) yang dipandu oleh PRISMA 2020 dilakukan menggunakan basis data Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, dan Google Scholar/Sinta. Dari 920 artikel yang teridentifikasi, sebanyak 38 artikel memenuhi kriteria kelayakan dan dimasukkan dalam kajian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa OBE umumnya diimplementasikan melalui hierarki capaian pembelajaran, pemetaan kurikulum, dan constructive alignment yang didukung oleh proses Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI). Tantangan utama implementasi meliputi resistensi terhadap perubahan, keterbatasan kapasitas sumber daya manusia, serta praktik yang berorientasi pada pemenuhan administratif semata. Implementasi yang berhasil berkaitan dengan komitmen kepemimpinan, keterlibatan pemangku kepentingan, dan pemanfaatan Learning Management System (LMS) secara efektif. Berdasarkan sintesis yang dilakukan, penelitian ini mengusulkan Institutional Constructive Alignment (ICA) sebagai pengembangan konseptual dari constructive alignment yang mengintegrasikan desain kurikulum, penjaminan mutu, dan tata kelola institusi. Penelitian ini menegaskan pentingnya penyelarasan implementasi OBE dengan manajemen kurikulum, persyaratan akreditasi, dan strategi peningkatan mutu berkelanjutan di pendidikan tinggi. Temuan ini memberikan panduan praktis bagi pimpinan perguruan tinggi, pengembang kurikulum, dan pembuat kebijakan dalam mewujudkan transformasi pendidikan berbasis OBE yang berkelanjutan.