Articles
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI PERKAWINAN BAGI ANAK (Studi Kasus Nomor 120/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Wng): PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI PERKAWINAN BAGI ANAK (Studi Kasus Nomor 120/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Wng) ]]>
<![CDATA[Yunita Rahma Wati]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Global Citizen : Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol 12 No 1 (2023): JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL CITIZEN ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Prodi PPkn Universitas Slamet Riyadi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33061/jgz.v12i1.8581
<![CDATA[This study aims to: (1) Know the basis for the judge's consideration in granting the application for marriage dispensation in case No. 120/Pdt.P/2022/PA.Wng. (2) Know the legal consequences caused after the application for marriage dispensation. This research is normative legal research that is prescriptive, meaning research that does not begin with a hypothesis. The approach taken is a statutory approach and a case approach with the types and sources of primary and secondary legal materials. This technique of collecting legal materials uses literature study techniques with the method of analyzing syllogism law materials through deduction thinking. The results showed that the judge in granting the application for marriage dispensation with various considerations, namely benefit and expediency, the existence of urgent reasons, the suitability of the evidence submitted with the facts of the trial, and the absence of a marriage prohibition. The legal consequence that arises with the granting of a marriage dispensation is that the bride and groom can legally marry according to the law. After the marriage of minors, the child is considered an adult and capable of carrying out legal acts.]]>
<![CDATA[Criminal Sanctions Against The Performers Of Damage Through Social Media ]]>
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Kristiyadi]]>
<![CDATA[ BULLET : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 1 No. 03 (2022): BULLET : Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Multi Kreasi Media ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[People in Indonesia do not understand what the law really is, they only know that if there is a mistake, there will be punishment. The lack of insight of the Indonesian people in understanding the law makes the government always socialize how important it is that people learn the law and apply sanctions for someone who violates the law. This research aims to analyze the form of legal settlement arrangements against perpetrators of defamation through social media, as well as to discuss criminal sanctions against perpetrators of defamation through social media. The research method used is normative by using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials in this research are primary sources of material originating from arrangements related to cases and secondary sources of material derived from legal books and journals. The data collection technique used the technique of recording and documenting data related to the case. The sophistication of the development of computer technology, especially in the telecommunications system, gave birth to a new term called the internet. The internet is one of the media electronic in terms of information and communication that is able to connect people around the world, so that the world feels increasingly narrow and without boundaries because of the ease in establishing communication. Globalization that gave birth to internet-based information and communication technology has shaped the pattern of human life with a new culture. With the internet, people are no longer worried about boundaries of territory, space, and time that hinder the process of information and communication because they have found a way that is more effective and efficient.]]>
<![CDATA[Eksistensi Keterangan Ahli dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Korupsi ]]>
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): GJMI - JULI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT. Gudang Pustaka Cendekia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59435/gjmi.v1i1.2
<![CDATA[Tindak pidana korupsi merupakan kejahatan yang luar biasa yang menimbulkan dampak luar biasa bagi negara dan kelangsungan hidup rakyatnya. Korupsi sebagai kejahatan luar biasa memerlukan upaya penanganan yang luar biasa pula, khususnya dalam proses pembuktiannya. Pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi seringkali memerlukan peran dari ahli yang berasal beberapa disiplin ilmu guna memastikan bahwa benar tindak pidana korupsi telah terjadi. Penulisan artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis eksistensi keterangan ahli sebagai alat bukti dalam pembuktian tindak pidana korupsi dan sejauh mana kontribusi alat bukti keterangan ahli dalam meyakinkan hakim bahwa telah terjadi tindak pidana korupsi. Penulisan artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah diajukannya keterangan ahli ke depan persidangan tindak pidana korupsi akan menambah keyakinan hakim tentang kebenaran dari alat bukti yang lainnya yang diajukan oleh penuntut umum, dan memperkuat keyakinan hakim untuk menjatuhkan putusan pemidanaan jika memang dari alat bukti yang ada terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melakukan korupsi]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KESEHATAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 14/PID.SUS/2021/PN PTI) ]]>
<![CDATA[Ana Pristiwijayani]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.73101
<![CDATA[Abstract: The research conducted by the author aims to determine the consider of judges in a rule deciding criminal cases by deliberately producing or distributing pharmaceutical preparations without a marketing license and the consider (verdict study Number: 14/Pid.Sus/2022 / PN Pti). This type of legal research is normative legal research and prescriptive and applied. The research approach uses a case approach. Legal materials used include primary and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is the study of literature. The analysis used is syllogism deduction. Based on the results of the study showed that, first, the position of pharmacologists compared to other evidence is the same as long as the conditions as valid evidence are met. Second, the consideration of the District Court judge in examining and deciding the criminal case by the defendant Ahmad Nur Muchlisin is following Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it has met at least two valid pieces of evidence, and the pharmacologist's statement does not have a binding evidentiary force value. Keywords: Health Crimes; Trihexyphenidyl; Evidence; Judge’s Consideration]]>
<![CDATA[PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN SANKSI PIDANA PENJARA KEPADA ANAK PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENGANIAYAAN (Putusan Nomor: 3/Pid.Sus-Anak/2020/PN-Enr) ]]>
<![CDATA[Charista Eforina Waruwu]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 3 (2023): JULI-SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i3.60237
<![CDATA[This article aims to determine the suitability of the judge's decision in imposing prison sentences on children who are perpetrators of abuse based on the provisions of Article 354 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code and the Law on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System. The type of research used is normative legal research which is prescriptive and applied. This legal research approach is a case approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is literature study. The technique of analyzing legal materials used in writing this law is the syllogism method using deductive thinking patterns. The results of this study indicate that the judge's decision in the Enrekang District Court Decision Number 3/Pid.sus-Anak/2020/PN-Enr has given a decision that is not in accordance with the provisions contained in Article 79 Paragraph (2) of the Child Criminal Protection System Act. because the Judge did not give consideration that refers to Article 354 of the Criminal Code.Keywords: Judge's Decision, Persecution, Child Defendant]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS PUTUSAN NOMOR 34/PDT.SUS HKI/MEREK/2021/PN JKT.PST TENTANG SENGKETA MEREK YUNTENG ]]>
<![CDATA[Rizki Rizki]]>;
<![CDATA[Deby Sephira Br Depari]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Vol 5 No 3 (2023): EDISI BULAN SEPTEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LPPM) Universitas Darma Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i3.3553
<![CDATA[Perdagangan pada masa ini sangat lah bebas membuat Hak Kekayaan Intelektual berperan penting dalam perdagangan internasional. Hak Kekayaan Intelektual adalah hak yang timbul atau lahir karena kemampuan intelektual manusia yang berupa temuan, karya, kreasi atau ciptaan di bidang teknologi, ilmu pengetahuan, seni dan sastra. Secara umum Hak Kekayaan Intelektual terbagi dalam dua kategori yaitu: Hak Cipta dan Hak Kekayaan Industri. Hak Kekayaan Industri meliputi Paten, Merek, Desain Industri, Desain Tata Letak Sirkuit Terpadu, Rahasia Dagang dan Varietas Tanaman. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah Uintuik meingeitahuii uipaya-uipaya yang meilinduingi peimeigang meireik teirkeinal luiar neigeiri di Indoneisia dari peimalsuian meireik serta Uintuik meingeitahuii dasar peirtimbangan Hakim dalam kasuis peinyeileisaian seingkeita meireik YUiNTEiNG dalam puituisan nomor 34/PDT.SUiS-HKI/MEiREiK/2021/PN JKT.PST. Jenis peineilitian ini meingguinakan meitodei yuiridis normativei, meitodei peineilitian yuiridis normativei meiruipakan suiatui meitodei peindeikatan teirhadap yang beirhuibuingan antara faktor-faktor normatif (asas-asas huikuim) dan faktor yuiridis (huikuim positif) Dan tentunya mengacu pada Uindang - uindang nomor 15 Tahuin 2001 dan Uindang - uindang 20 tahuin 2016 teintang Meireik. Merek membuat objek bisnis dapat dikenali dan mudah diingat oleh cakupan masyarakat yang lebih luas sehingga mereka dapat membedakan produk yang serupa atau produk yang berbeda dengan jenis lainnya.]]>
<![CDATA[TELAAH VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI FAKTOR PENENTU DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 208/PID.B/2022/PN BDG ]]>
<![CDATA[Dimas Bagus Anggoro Bangun]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.78474
<![CDATA[This study aims to determine how the Magistrate Judges' legal considerations are based on Visum et Repertum and how Visum et Repertum is a determining factor in proving theft charges with violence resulting in death in death Decision Number 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg. This is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied to case studies. The technique of collecting primary and secondary legal materials used for this research is a documental study and literature materials. Regarding the results of the research and discussion, it can be seen that the considerations of the Magistrate Judges in Decision Number 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg have included juridical and non-juridical aspects. Magistrate Judges require the opinion of a doctor as outlined in the Visum et Repertum, bearing in mind that the judge as a case breaker is not equipped with knowledge related to forensic medicine, so he must pay attention to Visum et Repertum as one piece of evidence that is adapted to other evidence. In addition, Visum et Repertum is a determining factor in proving the indictment of Decision 208/Pid.B/2022/PN.Bdg because it has strength in evidence, namely through matching Visum et Repertum with witness statements, which results are used as conclusions for judges who can be used as a consideration in determining whether a crime has occurred or not and determining the guilt of the defendant at trial.]]>
<![CDATA[PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM MENERAPKAN PASAL 2 UU TIPIKOR (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR77/PID.SUS-TPK/2018/PN.KDI) ]]>
<![CDATA[Aulia Putri Khairunnisa]]>;
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sebelas Maret University ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.75275
<![CDATA[This research examines the problem, what are the legal considerations of judges in applying Article 2 of the Corruption Crime Law to Decision Number 77/Pid.Sus-TPK/2018/PN.Kdi. The research method in writing this journal is normative legal research. This method involves an analysis of legal materials in the form of applicable legal regulations and existing legal documents. The legal material in this study is Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Corruption Crimes which is focused on Article 2. The results of the research show that as a judge has a great responsibility in making decisions that are fair and based on the law. Some of the legal considerations that must be considered by the judge in making a decision include applicable law, existing facts and evidence, principles of justice, public policy considerations, appropriate punishment, and the interests of the victim. Keywords: Corruption Crime, Judge's Legal Considerations; Article 2 of the Corruption Law]]>
<![CDATA[The Meaning of the Principle of Material Legality in the Reform of Indonesian Criminal Law ]]>
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ IJOLARES : Indonesian Journal of Law Research Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): IJOLARES: Indonesian Journal of Law Research ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV Tirta Pustaka Press ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.60153/ijolares.v1i2.22
<![CDATA[The principle of legality is a very important principle in criminal law. The principle of legality plays an important role in the enactment of material criminal law rules and is the basis for the validity of acts categorized as criminal acts. The purpose of this study is to determine the meaning of the principle of material legality in the reform of Indonesian criminal law. This article was prepared using the normative legal research method. The results showed that the reform of criminal law with the enactment of Law Number 1 Year 2023 on the Criminal Code did not only change the formulation of the principle of legality substantially, but changed the formal principle of legality which was originally far from the sense of public justice, expanded into a material principle of legality that better guarantees the sense of public justice. This article will discuss the material legality principle as a renewal of the formal legality principle, which aims to expand the reach of the legality principle in providing protection to the community from the negative consequences of criminal acts.]]>
<![CDATA[Criminal Liability of an Accused Who Commit Obstruction of Justice ]]>
<![CDATA[Itok Dwi Kurniawan]]>
<![CDATA[ ARIMA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): November ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Publikasi Inspirasi Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.62017/arima.v1i2.152
<![CDATA[The criminal justice system is run by law enforcement officers who have authority based on law. All kinds of actions carried out by law enforcement officers are legal as long as they do not conflict with statutory regulations. So any form of obstruction of the judicial process is a violation of the law. This article will discuss problems related to criminal acts of obstruction of justice processes which are not normatively limitatively determined in the formulation of articles of law. This article was written using normative legal research methods with a conceptual approach. The results of this research show that obstruction of the judicial process is a criminal act that has very broad elements, however what needs to be taken into account is that the parameter of obstruction of justice is the contamination of the dignity and worth of the judicial institution.]]>
