Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 33 Documents
Search

PROBLEMATIKA PENYIDIKAN KASUS NARKOTIKA DALAM UPAYA MEMUTUS JARINGAN PEREDARAN GELAP NARKOTIKA (Studi Kasus Penyidikan oleh Badan Narkotika Nasional Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta) Widyaputra, Endra; Harjiyatni, Francisca Romana; Nurharyanto, Eko
Kajian Hasil Penelitian Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37159/jmih.v7i2.3763

Abstract

This study aims to identify the problems by National Narcotics Board investigators in an effort to break the illicit narcotics trafficking network. In addition, it also examines the efforts made by the National Narcotics Board to overcome the problem. This research is a normative legal research using a statute approach, case approach and conceptual approach by combining primary and secondary data. The data obtained from the study were analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results showed several internal and external problems by BNN investigators in the investigation to break the network of narcotics cases, such as difficulties in evidence, rapid technological development, budget constraints, lack of human resources, complexity of narcotics networks, changes in the type and form of narcotics, suboptimal investigation techniques, corruption and collusion, resistance from related parties in the network, limitations in legal regulations, conflicts of interest, and lack of cooperation from other parties. In addition, this analysis also explains the efforts made by BNNP DIY to overcome the problems of the investigation. These efforts include optimizing investigations and collecting evidence, making maximum use of existing technology, proposing an increase in the budget, increasing the number of personnel, increasing the capacity of investigators, strengthening legal regulations, improving the supervision and accountability system, and increasing cooperation with other agencies
Implementing Access to Justice For Persons With Disabilities in The Bantul Religious Court Fajar Fauzani; Francisca Romana Harjiyatni
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 15 No 2 (2026)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.15.2.2026.391-412

Abstract

Access to justice for persons with disabilities in Indonesia’s Religious Courts remains underexplored, even though national legislation and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) require disability-inclusive proceedings. This study examines how disability-related access-to-justice norms are implemented in the Bantul Religious Court, identifies the factors that enable or hinder their implementation, and assesses the extent to which current practice conforms to the applicable legal framework. The article plays an exploratory and evaluative role by providing one of the first empirical socio-legal portraits of a religious court that has begun to institutionalize accommodation for persons with disabilities. Data were generated through qualitative empirical legal research: semi-structured interviews with judges, court staff, and ‘Sentra Advokasi Perempuan, Difabel dan Anak’ (SAPDA) representatives; courtroom and facility observation; and analysis of relevant regulations, Standard Operating Procedures, and case documents. Discussion combines descriptive mapping of infrastructure, procedures, and services with normative-empirical analysis against national and international standards. The findings show that Religious Court Bantul has introduced concrete accommodations, including the ‘Siap Antar Jemput Kembali Disabilitas’ (SIANJELITA) transport service, innovation of audio-visual communication channel between judges and disabled parties (deaf and mute) called CHITATA, disability-friendly physical facilities, and structured collaboration with SAPDA. At the same time, gaps persist in early disability screening, continuity of disability-competence training, availability and maintenance of assistive devices, provision of accessible information (such as Braille and screen-reader-compatible content), and disability-sensitive legal aid and complaint mechanisms. The article identifies Religious Court Bantul as a transitional model moving beyond formal compliance toward transformative equality. It outlines priority reforms and research agendas needed to consolidate an inclusive access-to-justice framework within the religious court system.
IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023 TENTANG BATAS USIA CALON PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN TERHADAP DOKTRIN NEGATIVE LEGISLATOR DAN POSITIVE LEGISLATOR Ogie Nuggraha; Francisca Romana Harjiyatni; Pudja Pramana KA
Kajian Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): November
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Janabadra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37159/2025kh.v10.i2.74

Abstract

This research aims to describe and explain the legal considerations of constitutional judges in decision number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 and to outline the implications of decision number 90/PUU-XXI/2023 for the position of the Constitutional Court as a negative legislator. This research uses normative legal research. The research approach uses a statutory approach and a case approach through the Constitutional Court decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. This research is descriptive analytical, namely research that presents careful data about humans and the symptoms of a developing society and these facts are analyzed based on theories or legal principles that correlate with the legal events in question. This research was conducted based on secondary data sources, namely library materials such as official documents, statutory regulations, scientific works, books, articles and other documents/manuscripts related to the object of this research. The results of the research and discussion are related to the concept of open legal policy, which is often questioned by the Constitutional Court in several of its decisions, especially in decision 90/PUU-XXI/2023 which examines the constitutionality of Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. There has been a shift if you read carefully the legal considerations (ratio decidendi) of the constitutional judges in the decision. Then the formulation of the age limit was interpreted by the Constitutional Court as an open legal policy due to the technical nature of the procedure which is essentially not within the Constitutional Court's authority to decide.