Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.316
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Wacana, Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora Arena Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Sriwijaya Law Review INDONESIAN JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW STUDIES INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure PETITA: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum dan Syariah (PJKIHdS) Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Jurnal Ius Constituendum Jurnal Suara Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Risalah Hukum NOMOI Law Review International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Ius Poenale International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) SASI Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies
Milda Istiqomah
Faculty Of Law, Brawijaya University
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 46 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Arena Hukum

 1 
PERBANDINGAN HUKUM PENGATURAN TINDAKAN PENYADAPAN (WIRETAPPING) DI INDONESIA DAN FILIP Milda Istiqomah
Arena Hukum Vol. 6 No. 1 (2013)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (787.468 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2013.00601.3

Abstract

AbstractThis study aims to analyze the comparative perspective on wiretapping in investigation process based on Law Number 15 Year 2003 on Combating Criminal Acts of Terrorism Indonesia and Republict Act 9372 on the Human Security Act (HSA) of the Philippines. This study uses normative juridical method including legislative approach (statute aproach) and comparative approach. Based on the discussion, it concludes that there are some similarities and differences regarding the wiretapping based on two laws, however article Article 31 paragraph (1 (, (2), and (3) of law Number 15 Year 2003 are assumed to potentially violate human rights for the terrorist suspects.Key words: comparative law, wiretapping, terrorismAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan tindakan penyadapan (wiretapping) terkait kewenangan penyidik dalam proses penyidikan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 15 tahun 2003 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Indonesia dan menurut Republict Act 9372 Human Security Act (HSA) Filipina. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute aproach) dan pendekatan perbandingan (comparative approach). Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan tentang perbandingan antara tindakan penyadapan sebagai kewenangan penyidik dalam kedua undang-undang, bahwa terdapat beberapa persamaan dan perbedaan mengenai pengaturan tindakan penyadapan tersebut dimana Pasal 31 ayat (1(, (2), dan (3) Undang-Undang Nomor 15 tahun 2003 lebih berpotensi menimbulkan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia (HAM) bagi tersangka tindak pidana terorisme.Kata kunci: perbandingan hukum, penyadapan, terorisme
The Sentencing of Insult and/or Defamation Cases in Indonesia Djatmika, Prija; Istiqomah, Milda
Arena Hukum Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum2025.01802.7

Abstract

This study examines sentencing decisions in cases of insult and/or defamation by employing a mixed-method approach that combines quantitative and qualitative analysis. Quantitative analysis uses district court verdicts from 2016 to 2021 to identify patterns and trends in sentencing, while qualitative analysis delves into aggravating and mitigating factors in judges’ considerations. Compared to previous studies, conducted by Samudra (2019), Ziar (2022), Fatmawati, et al. (2023), Emaliawati (2024), and Nurbaeti (2025), the result of this study shows that most cases end with prison sentences and/or fines. Judges consider various factors such as the severity of the offence, the impact on the victim, and the defendant’s background. Interestingly, there were several cases, particularly those involving corporations, where judges imposed much harsher sentences than the prosecutor’s prosecution, indicating a unique dynamic in the application of justice. From the perspective of judicial independence theory, the judges should exercise their independence in interpreting legal norms and balancing between positive law and substantive justice. Judges are not merely “mouthpieces of the law”; they are active actors in assessing the moral value and social impact of the defendant’s actions. Meanwhile, based on the theory of punishment, the decisions reflect a retributive approach as a form of retribution for reprehensible acts, as well as a preventive approach, to deter perpetrators and the wider community. This study makes an important contribution to understanding the complexity of sentencing in cases of insult and/or defamation and highlights the need for more measurable and consistent sentencing guidelines.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid Aji, Muhammad Kharisma Bayu Alimardani, Armin Andi Pambudi Utomo Anindita, Raras Natasya Bagus Sujatmiko BAMBANG SUGIRI Bayu Akbar Wicaksono Dhiana Puspitawati Dzulkarnain Alghafuru Syahputra Eka Yudha Kurniawan EMMILIA RUSDIANA, EMMILIA Fachrizal Afandi Faizin Sulistio Fajri, M. Hisyam Nur Fayadh Ayyasi Regar Furqani, Alvie Naufal Harsuko Riniwati I Nyoman NURJAYA I NYOMAN NURJAYA I Nyoman Nurjaya Ifahda Pratama Hapsari Kevin Krissentanu Winner Kurnia, Rizky Marjono Marjono Muchamad Ali Safaat Muhammad Cakranegara Muhammad Haykal Nasrudin, Zaldi Noerdajasakti, Setiawan Nurini Aprilianda Pratama, I Gusti Agung Ananta Pratama, I Gusti Ananta Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika, Prija Ramadianto, Anang Riyan Reni Ringgita Laia Rika Kurniaty Riyan Ramadianto, Anang Rizky Kurnia Rohmat Rohmat Rohmat rohmat Roytomi Isabilton Said, Muhamad Helmi Md Septiawan Ridho Permadi Siagian, Nurul Inayah Sidik Wiyono Sjafi’i, Imam Rahmat Sriti Hesti Astiti, Sriti Hesti Sugiri, Bambang Tantoi, Lalu Alex Taqwa, Faisal Akbaruddin Theo Sifra AHASIA Usuluddin, Fachruddin Wanto, Alfi Haris Widyaningsih, Aryana Sekar Yanu Romansyah Melvando Yessika Florencia Yuliati Yuliati