Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.392
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SUPREMASI: Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, Hukum dan Pengajarannya Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Journal of Development Research JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Jurist-Diction LEGAL BRIEF Daengku: Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Innovation International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan
Syamsuddin Muchtar
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar
Religion Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Restorative Justice in Medical Cases: Reflections on Criminal Law Reform M Aris Munandar Nandar; Amir Ilyas; Said Karim; Syamsuddin Muchtar
Jurist-Diction Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): Volume 8 No. 3, September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jd.v8i3.76991

Abstract

The reform of Indonesian criminal law signals a paradigm shift from a retributive model to a restorative approach grounded in fairness and humanity. This study seeks to explore how restorative justice may serve as a mechanism for resolving medical cases within the broader context of national criminal law reform. To address this question, the research relies on normative legal analysis, drawing on statutory provisions together with scholarship in criminal law, health law, and human rights. The analysis indicates that restorative justice provides a potentially fair and proportional response to medical cases, especially those involving medical personnel acting under situational pressures. Yet, the absence of detailed procedural guidelines and the overlap of authority between professional organizations and law enforcement agencies pose significant obstacles. The study concludes that stronger regulatory and institutional frameworks are required to ensure the effective and consistent application of restorative justice in the criminal justice system.
Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Hasil Hutan Bukan Kayu (Getah Pinus) di Kabupaten Tana Toraja Duwisno Ipang Tandilese; Syamsuddin Muchtar; Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v20i1.3758

Abstract

This study aims to analyze law enforcement against theft of non-timber forest products (pine resin) in Tana Toraja and inhibiting factors in law enforcement. This research is normative-empirical research using a statutory approach, conceptual approach, and sociological enforcement with data sources in the form of observations, documentation, and interviews with the police, prosecutors, and judges who handle the case. The results of this study indicate that law enforcement against the crime of theft of forest products in Tana Toraja Regency substantially uses Law Number 41 of 1999 concerning Forestry, but structurally, law enforcers are still less effective in handling it. While the inhibiting factors affecting law enforcement, namely structurally, the police are still less effective in acting according to the mandate of the law, there are still unscrupulous officials who intervene in the taking of pine resin; and related facilities or facilities are not adequate in supporting the implementation of law enforcement against the crime of pine resin theft.
Disparitas Pemidanaan dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Muhammad Indra Jaya; M. Said Karim; Syamsuddin Muchtar
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 20 No. 1 (2024): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v20i1.3943

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal factors and factors of law enforcement officials that influence the disparity in sentencing for corruption which results in state losses. The type of research used is empirical normative legal research. The results of the study show that (1) the legal factor in the presence of disparity decisions regarding corruption crimes has not been optimal because the minimum criminal sanctions in the corruption law cause disparity in sentencing which is quite disturbing due to the non-uniformity in the provision of minimum sentences for similar offenses. (2) the factor of law enforcement officials as the cause of the disparity in sentencing of corruption case decisions is very clearly seen and felt to be very unfair to each other, there is no clear guideline regarding the prevention of disparity in corruption criminal rulings so law enforcement officers exercise their power to decide similar offenses the pretext of the judicial power law.
Co-Authors Ahmad Masum Arnita Pratiwi Arifin Audyna Mayasari Muin Budiyanto Desi Amalia Anwar Duwisno Ipang Tandilese Elma Rianti Haeranah Haeranah Hijrah Adhyanti Mirzana Ilyas, Amir M Aris Munandar Nandar M. Aris Munandar M. Said Karim M. Susilo Ihlasul Ashar Marwati Riza Maskun Muhammad Arfandy Amran Muhammad Indra Jaya Muhammad Mutawalli Mukhlis Muhammad Santiago Pawe Musakkir Musakkir Nur Azisa Nur Azisa Nur Azisa rahmithasari marwahputri Rizwandi Adealmuqni Said Karim Siti Zubaidah Wiwie Heryani