Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

Reinterpreting Iddah Through Family Resilience Theory: Socioeconomic Experiences of Widows in Rural Indonesia Chelsa Lathifa Annada; Layyin Mahfiana; Riffat Shahzady
Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law and Family Studies Vol. 8 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Shariah UIN Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v8i1.12627

Abstract

This study investigates the challenges widows face during the iddah period following their husbands' deaths in Ngawen Village, Klaten Regency, Indonesia, with particular attention to differences in occupational background and educational level. Employing a qualitative case study design, the research collected primary data through semi-structured, in-depth interviews with purposively selected participants, including homemakers, small traders, and informal workers. These data were complemented by documentary analysis and village demographic records. The findings were analyzed using content analysis grounded in Froma Walsh’s family resilience theory. The study reveals that widows experience distinct forms of vulnerability and adaptation depending on their socioeconomic background. Homemakers tend to rely heavily on extended family support, traders demonstrate flexible economic coping strategies, while informal workers undergo significant personal transformation to sustain family survival. Adaptation mechanisms also include participation in socio-religious activities and the application of the principle of al-dlarurat tubih al-mahzhurat to negotiate between religious norms and practical necessities. This study contributes empirically to the limited scholarship on iddah in rural Muslim communities. Theoretically, it supports a contextual reinterpretation of the Islamic Law Compilation (KHI) that remains aligned with the substantive objectives of sharia while strengthening widow resilience and community-based support systems.
Efektivitas Penerapan Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) Rosidah, Zaidah Nur; Mahfiana, Layyin
TAWAZUN: Journal of Sharia Economic Law Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Tawazun: Journal of Sharia Economic Law
Publisher : Sharia Faculty Islamic Economic Law Study Department

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21043/tawazun.v3i1.7529

Abstract

This study aims to determine the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution in the National Sharia Arbitration Agency (Basyarnas). This study uses a method of socio legal study, how sharia principles are applied in resolving sharia economic disputes so that they can provide justice for both parties. Secondary data collection is carried out through a literature study of primary legal materials and secondary legal material. Some data was requested for confirmation from the National Sharia Arbitration Agency (Basyarnas) in the Yogyakarta region. To obtain answers to the research problems, 3 activities were carried out simultaneously, namely data reduction, data presentation, conclusion drawing / syllogistic verification of deduction. The results of the research and discussion obtained several conclusions, namely first, Islamic principles have not been maximally implemented by Basyarnas, this can be seen from the basis of the consideration of Basyarnas law in its decision. Basyarnas should also correct in terms of the contract, whether it is in accordance with sharia principles or not so that the arising of the dispute is not solely due to the default of the customer but can also be caused by incompatibility with sharia principles. Second, according to Antony Allot's theory of legal effectiveness, the application of sharia principles in sharia economic dispute resolution has not been carried out in accordance with sharia principles, this is due to the lack of clarity in the case in Basyarnas' decision.
Analysis Of The Views of Kiai NU and Muhammadiyah in Bangkalan Madura Regarding The Use of Bitcoin as A Means of Payment of Zakat Fatimatus Zahroh; Layyin Mahfiana
Jurnal Al-Hakim: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, Studi Syariah, Hukum dan Filantropi Vol. 5, No. 1 May 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22515/jurnalalhakim.v5i1.7068

Abstract

This study aims to find out the views of NU and Muhammadiyah kiai in Bangkalan Madura related to Bitcoin law and zakat payment law with Bitcoin. This research was motivated because the pros and cons related to the use of Bitcoin and zakat payments using Bitcoin money until now are still a discussion of scholars until the kiai in Bangkalan Madura also differ in opinion regarding the Bitcoin law, where most of the kiai NU and Muhammadiyah Bangkalan related to Bitcoin law and zakat law with Bitcoin declare haram, because it contains elements of gharar (obscurity ), maysir (gambling), as well as the absence of official regulation from the government. Therefore, zakat with Bitcoin is not allowed. However, there are some scholars who state that the digital money law is halal because digital money like crypto is classified as a "virtual treasure" thus it applies mandatory zakat to Bitcoin money. In addition, there are also differences in regulations between the government and BAPPEBTI, where the government states in Law No. 7 of 2011 concerning currency that it does not accept payment instruments other than Rupiah, while in BAPPEBTI regulations provide protection for Bitcoin users so as not to feel losses. However, obeying government rules is mandatory.
LEGAL PLURALISM IN BUSINESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION: A Socio-Legal Analysis of Customary Commercial Practices in Jambi, Indonesia Evi Ariyani; Layyin Mahfiana; Luthfiana Zahriani; Masrukhin Masrukhin; Jaka Susila
Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Vol 17, No 1 (2026): Jurisdictie
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j.v17i1.39787

Abstract

Business dispute settlement in Indonesia remains dominated by formal institutions that are often costly, complex, and socially unresponsive. In highly plural regions like Jambi, commercial resolutions integrate state law and customary law mechanisms within local economic relations. This socio-legal study examines the role of customary law in business dispute resolution and its standing within Indonesia's legal pluralism framework, combining normative business law with empirical data on local commercial practices. The findings reveal that customary dispute mechanisms are vital for maintaining social harmony, achieving substantive justice, and sustaining commercial trust. This efficacy stems from communal values, customary authorities, and shared social norms, often outperforming formal systems. Crucially, this study contributes to reconstructing legal pluralism theory by positioning customary law as a functional alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism in modern commerce. Beyond its local scope, these insights offer a novel paradigm for global legal pluralism, demonstrating how non-State, indigenous normative orders can effectively govern modern business relations while challenging the Western-centric hegemony of formalistic arbitration. Ultimately, this research provides a scalable framework and blueprint for Global South countries to design sustainable, socially responsive, and culturally anchored commercial dispute resolution systems.Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis di Indonesia masih didominasi oleh lembaga formal yang seringkali berbiaya tinggi, rumit, dan kurang responsif secara sosial. Di wilayah plural seperti Jambi, penyelesaian komersial mengintegrasikan hukum negara dan mekanisme hukum adat dalam relasi ekonomi lokal. Studi sosio-legal ini menguji peran hukum adat dalam sengketa bisnis dan kedudukannya dalam kerangka pluralisme hukum Indonesia, memadukan analisis normatif hukum bisnis dengan data empiris praktik komersial lokal. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa mekanisme adat vital untuk menjaga harmoni sosial, mencapai keadilan substantif, dan mempertahankan kepercayaan bisnis karena efektivitas nilai komunal dan otoritas adatnya. Secara krusial, studi ini berkontribusi merekonstruksi teori pluralisme hukum dengan memosisikan hukum adat sebagai penyelesaian sengketa alternatif (ADR) yang fungsional dalam perdagangan modern. Di luar konteks lokal, temuan ini menawarkan paradigma baru bagi pluralisme hukum global, membuktikan bahwa tatanan normatif adat non-negara dapat mengatur hubungan bisnis modern secara efektif sekaligus menantang hegemoni Barat dalam arbitrase formalistik. Pada akhirnya, penelitian ini menyediakan kerangka kerja dan cetak biru bagi negara-negara Global South untuk merancang sistem penyelesaian sengketa komersial yang berkelanjutan, responsif secara sosial, dan berakar pada budaya lokal.
Penerapan Random Forest, SMOTEN, dan Class Merging untuk Klasifikasi Status Pekerjaan Lulusan pada Data Tracer Study UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta Febrianta Surya Nugraha; Layyin Mahfiana
Jurnal Ilmiah IT CIDA Vol 11 No 2: Desember 2025
Publisher : STMIK AMIKOM Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55635/jic.v11i2.334

Abstract

Tracer study merupakan instrumen penting untuk mengevaluasi kualitas lulusan dan relevansi kurikulum terhadap kebutuhan dunia kerja. Namun, pemanfaatan data tracer study masih terbatas, sementara karakteristik datanya umumnya menghadapi permasalahan ketidakseimbangan kelas (class imbalance) yang dapat menurunkan performa model klasifikasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan membangun model klasifikasi status pekerjaan lulusan menggunakan algoritma Random Forest dengan pendekatan SMOTEN serta membandingkan tiga strategi class merging pada data tracer study UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta yang terdiri atas 2.258 responden dan 30 variabel. Tahapan penelitian mengikuti kerangka CRISP-DM yang meliputi persiapan data, pemodelan, dan evaluasi menggunakan Stratified 5-Fold Cross Validation. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi aggressive class merging (2 kelas) memberikan performa terbaik dengan test accuracy sebesar 76,99%, balanced accuracy sebesar 69,54%, serta menurunkan overfitting gap dari 35,83% menjadi 15,06%. Analisis feature importance menunjukkan bahwa tingkat hubungan studi–pekerjaan (20,62%), IPK kelulusan (17,09%), waktu mulai mencari pekerjaan (11,95%), praktikum (9,63%), dan kerja lapangan (6,68%) merupakan faktor yang paling berpengaruh terhadap status pekerjaan lulusan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa penyederhanaan kelas efektif meningkatkan performa klasifikasi pada data tracer study yang tidak seimbang, sekaligus menegaskan pentingnya kesesuaian kurikulum dan pengalaman praktis dalam meningkatkan kesiapan kerja lulusan.