Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Penerapan Asas Aut Dedere Aut Punere Bagi Warga Negara Indonesia Pelaku Pembunuhan Di Arab Saudi Dikaitkan Dengan Konvensi Wina 1963 Tentang Hubungan Konsuler Putra Zenno Januarsyah, Mas; Saepulloh, Aep
YUDHISTIRA : Jurnal Yurisprudensi, Hukum dan Peradilan Vol. 3 No. 3 (2025): September
Publisher : Cv. Kalimasada Group

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.1991

Law enforcement against Indonesian citizens (WNI) who commit serious crimes abroad, particularly murder in Saudi Arabia, poses challenges in implementing the principle of aut dedere aut punire and protection under the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. This study aims to analyze the discrepancy between judicial practices in Saudi Arabia and the consular protection obligations of the sending state (Indonesia). Using normative juridical methods and a case-based approach, this study finds that Saudi Arabia prioritizes territorial jurisdiction and sharia law in prosecuting perpetrators, without considering extradition. Meanwhile, the implementation of consular protection is often suboptimal due to delays in information and diplomatic obstacles. This study recommends strengthening legal diplomacy and increasing bilateral cooperation for more effective protection of Indonesian citizens involved in serious legal cases abroad.

Penanganan Perdagangan Manusia Di Kamboja Dalam Perspektif Hukum Internasional Fitri Sri Rahayu; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah
Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Vol. 2 No. 8 (2025): Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi (Edisi Agustus 2025)
Publisher : PT. Hasba Edukasi Mandiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71282/jurmie.v2i8.790

Human trafficking is a serious and growing crime, with Cambodia being one of the countries most vulnerable to this issue. This study aims to analyze the handling of human trafficking in Cambodia from an international law perspective. Using a qualitative method and literature review approach, the research draws on international conventions, reports from international organizations, and Cambodian national regulations. The findings indicate that although Cambodia has adopted several legal frameworks to combat human trafficking, implementation remains hindered by limited resources, corruption, and weak cross-border cooperation. Despite support from the international community, such as the Palermo Protocol, consistent law enforcement continues to pose a significant challenge. The study highlights the need for stronger law enforcement and improved victim rehabilitation systems to address the problem effectively. Greater collaboration between the Cambodian government, international organizations, and non-governmental organizations is essential. Such joint efforts are expected to create more effective solutions in combating human trafficking and enhancing protection for victims.

Menelusuri Kasus Penyuapan Presiden FIFA dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Sandey Tantra Paramitha; Dasuki; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (September - Oktober 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2548

Kasus suap dalam FIFA telah menimbulkan krisis kepercayaan terhadap integritas organisasi olahraga internasional ini. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik suap dalam FIFA dari perspektif hukum kejahatan internasional, dengan fokus pada regulasi anti-suap yang diterapkan dan tantangan penegakannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur yang komprehensif, melibatkan peninjauan kritis terhadap artikel jurnal akademik, buku, dan dokumen hukum internasional, termasuk Konvensi PBB Melawan Korupsi (UNCAC). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat kerangka hukum internasional yang kuat, penegakan hukum terhadap praktik suap di FIFA menghadapi berbagai hambatan, termasuk perbedaan sistem hukum nasional dan keterbatasan koordinasi lintas batas. Reformasi internal FIFA yang mencakup pembentukan Komite Etik Independen dan penerapan prosedur due diligence yang lebih ketat telah dilakukan untuk meningkatkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas. Artikel ini memberikan rekomendasi untuk memperkuat kerjasama internasional dan memperbaiki mekanisme penegakan hukum untuk mengatasi korupsi dalam organisasi olahraga.

PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE DALAM TINDAK PIDANA DI BIDANG KETENAGAKERJAAN Zenno Januarsyah, Mas Putra
LITIGASI Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.17862

In practice, a significant number of criminal cases within the domain of employment have been resolved through the implementation of restorative justice methodologies, particularly in instances where wage violations have occurred below the established minimum wage. However, there are no specific regulations governing the implementation of restorative justice as a mechanism for resolving criminal cases in the employment sector. The issues addressed in this research pertain to the regulation of restorative justice in the resolution of criminal cases in the field of employment in Indonesia and the implementation of restorative justice in the resolution of labor crime cases. This research is descriptive and of a normative juridical nature, utilizing secondary data in the form of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. It employs a statute approach and a case approach, and is subsequently analyzed using qualitative methods. The research findings indicate that there is no specific legislation governing the implementation of restorative justice in the resolution of criminal cases pertaining to labor in Indonesia. However, the Prosecutor's Regulation Number 15 of 2020 concerning Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice and Republic of Indonesia State Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice may serve as a potential reference point for the application of restorative justice in labor-related offenses. Then, the application of restorative justice in resolving criminal cases has in practice been carried out in cases of criminal violations of employment in paying wages...

Embezzlement in the Private Sector: Legal Challenges and Regulatory Gaps in Corporate Governance Kiki Kristanto; Muhamad Adystia Sunggara; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah; Pita Permatasari; Vicko Taniady
IJCLS (Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies) Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025): Indonesia J. Crim. L. Studies (November, 2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijcls.v10i2.24881

This study critically examines the issue of embezzlement in the private sector, a form of white-collar crime that continues to pose significant threats to corporate integrity, investor trust, and economic stability. Despite its prevalence and damaging consequences, legal responses remain fragmented both at the level of national legislation and international legal harmonization. Using a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, comparative, and futuristic approaches, this research systematically analyzes the underlying legal and institutional deficiencies and formulates reform-oriented recommendations. Drawing on statutes, case law, academic doctrines, and cross-jurisdictional practices, the study identifies key regulatory gaps: the absence of a consistent legal definition of private sector embezzlement, weak enforcement mechanisms, and insufficient corporate accountability provisions. Comparative insights from jurisdictions such as the United States, Germany, and Singapore highlight the effectiveness of integrated models combining criminal sanctions, internal compliance obligations, and external oversight. In light of these findings, the study proposes targeted reforms in Indonesian corporate law particularly to clarify corporate criminal liability, mandate real-time internal controls, and establish independent ethics committees. These proposals are intended to guide lawmakers, regulatory bodies, and corporate policymakers toward developing more effective enforcement mechanisms and corporate governance structures. Ultimately, the study underscores that embezzlement is not merely a legal infraction but a systemic governance failure requiring coordinated legal, institutional, and ethical responses across national and international levels.

Menelusuri Kasus Penyuapan Presiden FIFA dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Sandey Tantra Paramitha; Dasuki; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 6 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (September - Oktober 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v4i6.2548

Kasus suap dalam FIFA telah menimbulkan krisis kepercayaan terhadap integritas organisasi olahraga internasional ini. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik suap dalam FIFA dari perspektif hukum kejahatan internasional, dengan fokus pada regulasi anti-suap yang diterapkan dan tantangan penegakannya. Metode yang digunakan adalah studi literatur yang komprehensif, melibatkan peninjauan kritis terhadap artikel jurnal akademik, buku, dan dokumen hukum internasional, termasuk Konvensi PBB Melawan Korupsi (UNCAC). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat kerangka hukum internasional yang kuat, penegakan hukum terhadap praktik suap di FIFA menghadapi berbagai hambatan, termasuk perbedaan sistem hukum nasional dan keterbatasan koordinasi lintas batas. Reformasi internal FIFA yang mencakup pembentukan Komite Etik Independen dan penerapan prosedur due diligence yang lebih ketat telah dilakukan untuk meningkatkan transparansi dan akuntabilitas. Artikel ini memberikan rekomendasi untuk memperkuat kerjasama internasional dan memperbaiki mekanisme penegakan hukum untuk mengatasi korupsi dalam organisasi olahraga.

Operasi Militer Amerika Serikat atas Penangkapan Presiden Nicolas Maduro Menurut Hukum Pidana Internasional Egi Gilang Agustan; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah
Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 7 (2026): Cerdika: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/cerdika.v6i7.3689

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji legalitas operasi militer Amerika Serikat dalam konteks penangkapan Presiden Nicolas Maduro berdasarkan hukum pidana internasional. Permasalahan yang diangkat adalah apakah tindakan unilateral Amerika Serikat berupa pengiriman pasukan militer ke wilayah Venezuela untuk menangkap kepala negara yang sedang berkuasa dapat dibenarkan secara hukum internasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa operasi militer Amerika Serikat tersebut bertentangan dengan prinsip kedaulatan negara, larangan penggunaan kekerasan dalam Piagam PBB, serta imunitas kepala negara yang diakui hukum internasional kebiasaan. Meskipun dakwaan narkotika terhadap Maduro dapat dikategorikan sebagai yurisdiksi universal, penggunaan kekuatan militer untuk penegakan hukum pidana internasional tidak memiliki dasar hukum yang sah tanpa mandat Dewan Keamanan PBB. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa tidak ada yurisdiksi penegakan hukum (enforcement jurisdiction) yang dapat dilakukan secara koersif di luar wilayah suatu negara tanpa persetujuan negara yang bersangkutan atau otorisasi Dewan Keamanan PBB.

LEGAL RECOGNITION OF METAVERSE PROPERTY RIGHTS AND THE TRANSFER OF VIRTUAL ASSETS IN INDONESIAN PRIVATE LAW Zico Junius Fernando; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah; Firdaus Arifin; Vidyadhara Prawiratama Nugraha; Fardana Kusumah
Indonesia Private Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/iplr.v7i1.5183

Metaverse has transformed virtual assets into economically valuable objects that challenge conventional concepts of property under Indonesian private law. Although virtual assets such as cryptoassets, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and metaverse property are widely traded, their legal status remains uncertain, creating ambiguity regarding ownership, transfer, and legal protection. This study examines the normative basis for recognizing virtual assets as objects of property rights within Indonesia's civil law system. Using a normative juridical method with a comparative approach, the study analyzes Indonesian private law alongside developments in England and Wales, Singapore, Japan, and the European Union. The findings demonstrate that virtual assets satisfy the defining characteristics of intangible property, including identifiability, exclusive control, transferability, and economic value, making them capable of recognition as objects of proprietary rights. The study further argues that blockchain-based transfers and smart contracts can operate as legally valid mechanisms for transferring ownership when supported by appropriate legal recognition. To strengthen legal certainty, Indonesia should recognize virtual assets as a distinct category of intangible property, adapt property law to digital transactions, strengthen proprietary remedies, and modernize dispute resolution and cross-border enforcement. These reforms would provide a coherent legal framework for protecting virtual assets and support the development of Indonesia's digital economy.

Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Beneficial Owner dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi yang Dilakukan oleh Korporasi di Indonesia Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah; Agustinus Purnomo Hadi; Yogi Muhammad Rahman; Amriyanto; Ahmad Jaeni
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/ius.v14i2.2035

Corporate corruption in Indonesia increasingly involves individuals who exercise substantive control over corporations without holding formal positions within their organizational structures. This creates a legal problem because the Criminal Code recognizes beneficial owners as potential subjects of criminal liability but does not provide clear operational parameters for the circumstances under which such liability may be imposed . This study examines the criminal liability of beneficial owners in corporate corruption cases and the legal standards required to attribute individual responsibility. It employs a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and limited comparative approaches. The findings show that beneficial-owner status and the receipt of economic benefits cannot independently establish criminal liability. Liability requires proof of effective control, a clear connection between that control and the corrupt conduct, and individual culpability. The cases of PT Imaji Media, Garuda Indonesia–Rolls Royce, and Pertamina illustrate different forms of control through nominee management, corporate intermediaries, and indirect corporate relationships. Piercing the corporate veil may assist in identifying the individuals behind corporate structures but cannot replace proof of personal involvement in the offense. The study emphasizes the need for clearer legal standards based on effective control, connection with corrupt conduct, individual culpability, and economic benefit as supporting evidence.

Konstruksi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Direksi BUMN Persero Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dihubungkan Dengan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Dwi Husiano; Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah
JURNAL SYNTAX IMPERATIF : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan
Publisher : CV RIFAINSTITUT

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54543/syntaximperatif.v7i3.1186

Pertanggungjawaban pidana Direksi BUMN Persero dalam perkara tindak pidana korupsi masih menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, terutama ketika kerugian akibat keputusan bisnis dikualifikasikan sebagai kerugian keuangan negara. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis rekonstruksi pertanggungjawaban pidana Direksi BUMN Persero berdasarkan doktrin Business Judgment Rule (BJR) dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 68/Pid.Sus-TPK/2025/PN Jkt Pst serta mengkaji upaya mengatasi problematika antara kerugian bisnis dan kerugian keuangan negara. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus, serta dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa doktrin Business Judgment Rule harus menjadi instrumen awal dalam menilai keputusan bisnis direksi. Direksi tidak dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana apabila keputusan diambil dengan itikad baik, kehati-hatian, tanpa benturan kepentingan, dan sesuai kepentingan perseroan. Pertanggungjawaban pidana hanya dapat dikenakan apabila terbukti terdapat penyalahgunaan kewenangan, unsur kesalahan (mens rea), serta hubungan kausal dengan kerugian keuangan negara. Selain itu, diperlukan harmonisasi pengaturan antara hukum korporasi dan hukum pidana serta penyusunan pedoman bagi aparat penegak hukum guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum tanpa mengurangi efektivitas pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi.

Title

Found 22 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 22 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 22 Documents
Search