Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.189
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KOPERTIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Informatika dan Komputer JURIKOM (Jurnal Riset Komputer) Jurnal ICT : Information Communication & Technology Jurnal Ilmiah Betrik : Besemah Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Jurnal Accounting Information System (AIMS) Jurnal Riset Sistem Informasi dan Teknologi Informasi (JURSISTEKNI) Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT Jurnal Accounting Information System (AIMS) Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Ruru Smatika Jurnal : STIKI Informatika Jurnal
Saeful Anwar
STMIK IKMI Cirebon
Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Mechanical Engineering Other

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 21 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
EVALUASI PENGALAMAN PENGGUNA MAHASISWA TERHADAP SISTEM INFORMASI SIASAT: PENDEKATAN DENGAN USER EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE Saeful Anwar
Jurnal Ilmu Komputer Ruru Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Edisi Januari
Publisher : Yayasan Grace Berkat Anugerah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to analyze student user experience on the Satya Wacana Information System (SIASAT) using the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ). UEQ is a measurement method from the aspect of its use and the aspect of the experience, including a compressive impression using a questionnaire scale. The UEQ has 26 questions that must be filled out by respondents, where the questions cover 6 aspects, including attractiveness, efficiency, perspicuity, dependability, stimulation, and novelty. The UEQ questionnaire in this study used data from 54 active SWCU student respondents who understood the use of the Satya Wacana Academic Information System (SIASAT) well. The final results of the tests carried out obtained data for the scale of attractiveness, efficiency, dependability, and stimulation to get a normal evaluation category. Meanwhile, the novelty scale gets a negative evaluation category and the perspicuity scale gets a positive evaluation category. Then for the results of the benchmark evaluation, the majority got the Bad category which includes a scale of attractiveness, efficiency, dependability, stimulation, and novelty. Only one scale that gets the Above Average category (Good Enough) is perspicuity.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Abdul Robi Padri Ade Irma Purnamasari Afif Maulana Sidik Ahmad Faqih Ahmad Faqih Ali Ali Arif Rinaldi Dikananda Basysyar, Fadhil Muhammad Cep Lukman Rohmat Chaidir Ali Dian Ade Kurnia Dias Bayu Saputra Dilita Pramasmawari Lita Dimas Aji Dita Rizki Amalia Edi Tohidi Gifthera Dwilestari Gifthera Dwilestari Heliyanti Susana Ibnu Alfian Iin Kanda Muhamad Ishak Khamim Surya Hadi Kusuma Al Atros Kokom Komariyah Martanto Martanto . Nana Suarna Nana Suarna Narasati, Riri Narasati Nining Rahaningsih Nisa Dieanwati Nuris Odi Nurdiawan Raditya Danar Dana Rahaditya Dasuki Rahmat Mauludin Revita Lestari Faujiah Risa Komala Sari Ruli Herdiana Ryan Hamonangan Sandy Eka Permana Siti Rini Sari sri wahyuni nengsih Tati Suprapti Topan Hadi Tuti Hartati Yudhistira Arie Wijaya