Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.629
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal ILMU USHULUDDIN Jurnal Adabiyah NUKHBATUL 'ULUM : Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam KARST : Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapannya MDJ (Makassar Dental Journal) Jurnal khabar: Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam Iqtishaduna : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Media Publikasi Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia (MPPKI) CENDEKIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan ISTIQRA: JURNAL HASIL PENELITIAN Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Kedokteran (JURRIKE) PIJAR: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran AL-QIBLAH: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Bahasa Arab Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu JAWAMIUL KALIM: Jurnal Kajian Hadis Tashdiq: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Dakwah TIJARAH: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, dan Bisnis Syariah Kalam Al Gazali: Education and Islamic Studies Journal
Arifuddin Ahmad
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : NUKHBATUL 'ULUM : Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam

 1 
Quality Standards for Online Dakwah Content (Thematic Study in the Book Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim) Putriany, Putriany; Zulfahmi Alwi; Arifuddin Ahmad; Ra’fah Jamilah Saadah
NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/nukhbah.v11i1.1964

Abstract

The quality of online da‘wah content is a critical determinant of its effectiveness in conveying religious messages in the digital era. Its impact is highly contingent upon the faithful application of ethical principles rooted in the teachings of Islam. This study aims to identify quality standards for online da‘wah content based on the teachings of Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. The research adopts a qualitative literature review (library research) approach, employing both normative–theological and sociological methods, and applies a thematic analysis of relevant hadith narratives. The findings indicate that quality standards for online da‘wah content, as reflected in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim, comprise core values such as honesty, politeness, gentleness, friendliness, humility, moderation, exemplary behavior, refraining from slander and conflict, and fostering an optimistic outlook. The hadiths in Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim underscore the vital significance of preserving the authenticity of the da‘wah message and upholding ethical standards in its delivery — a matter of utmost relevance when addressing the challenges posed by digital platforms. To ensure that online da‘wah has a constructive and meaningful impact in nurturing the faith and moral character of its audience, it must be grounded in these high moral and intellectual standards.
Al-Żahabi's Thought in Hadith (Study of Talkhīṣ Mustadrak al-Ḥākim Book) Umar, Siddiq Aminullah; Arifuddin Ahmad; Erwin Hafid
NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): NUKHBATUL 'ULUM: Jurnal Bidang Kajian Islam
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat (P3M) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Islam dan Bahasa Arab (STIBA) Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36701/nukhbah.v10i1.1307

Abstract

This research explores the thoughts of al-Żahabi in the field of hadith, specifically within his book Talkhīṣ al-Mustadrak. The objective is to understand al-Żahabi's perspectives on hadith in this particular work. This literature review employs a combined approach of hadith and historical sciences. The data analysis methods include descriptive and comparative analysis. The findings reveal that al-Żahabi provided accurate scholarly commentary on the hadiths in Al-Mustadrak. For instance, he criticized a hadith authenticated by al-Hakim from the companion Sa’d bin Abi Waqqāṣ in al-Mustadrak due to its weak chain originating from Ṭalḥah bin Zaid al-Qurasyi, deemed weak by many hadith scholars. Despite this, there are instances of errors in al-Zahabi's assessments, such as in the evaluation of a hadith in the al-Mustadrak" on commercial transactions, authenticated by al-Hakim according to Bukhāri and Muslim's criteria, while al-Żahabi judged it according to Muslim's conditions. Further examination revealed discrepancies in the chain narrated by al-Ḥākim and a different chain in Saḥīḥ Muslim. Al-Żahabi refrained from commenting on most hadiths in al-Mustadrak, only referencing al-Ḥākim's authentication without necessarily approving it. His silence on certain hadiths is due to uncertainty about their status or prior assessment of the narrators. Therefore, scholars examining al-Mustadrak are advised to refer to al-Żahabi's comments in Talkhīṣ al-Mustadrak. Penelitian ini membahas tentang pemikiran al-Żahabi di bidang hadis. Tujuan penelitian ini, untuk mengetahui pemikiran al-Żahabi di bidang hadis dalam kitabnya Talkhīṣ al-Mustadrak. Penelitian ini merupakan kajian pustaka dengan menggunakan pendekatan ilmu hadis dan historis. Metode analisis data yang digunakan adalah metode analisis deskriptif dan kompratif. hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa al-Żahabi telah memberikan komentar ilmiah yang tepat terhadap hadis-hadis di dalam kitab al-Mustadrak. Seperti saat ia mendaifkan hadis yang disahihkan oleh al-Ḥākim dari sahabat Sa’d bin Abi Waqqāṣ dalam kitab al-Mustadrak karena semua jalur sanadnya berpangkal pada Ṭalḥah bin Zaid al-Qurasyi yang dinilai daif oleh banyak ulama hadis. Walaupun terdapat pula beberapa kekeliruan dari al-Żahabi dalam penilaiannya. Seperti pada hadis dalam kitab al-Mustadrak pada bab al-Buyu’ yang disahihkan oleh al-Ḥākim berdasarkan kriteria al-Bukhāri dan Muslim, sedangkan al-Żahabi menilainya sesuai dengan syarat Muslim. Namun, setelah diteliti jalur hadis yang diriwayatkan oleh al-Ḥākim berasal dari Muḥammad bin Ṡaur, bukan merupakan rawi Muslim. Adapun jalur hadis hadis di dalam Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim berasal dari Ibnu wahb. Sebagian besar hadis kitab al-Mustadrak tidak dikomentari oleh al-Żahabi. Ia hanya mengutip pentashihan al-Ḥākim terhadap hadis. Diamnya al-Żahabi terhadap pentashihan al-Ḥākim tidak menunjukkan persetujuannya terhadap penilaian tersebut. Ia tidak mengomentari sebagian hadis karena ia belum mengetahui secara pasti status hadis tersebut, dan pada sebagian hadis, ia tidak memberikan komentar karena ia telah menilai rawi hadis tersebut sebelumnya. Sehingga ia tidak lagi mengulangi penilaiannya. Berdasarkan hasil di atas maka para pengkaji hadis yang ingin meneliti kitab al-Mustadrak, untuk mengacu terlebih dahulu pada komentar-komentar al-Żahabi dalam Talkhīṣ al-Mustadrak.
Co-Authors A. Fadli Abdullah Abdullah Abustani Ilyas Ajir, Muhajirin Andi Irhamnia Sakinah Andi Tihardimanto Andi Wawan Mulyawan Azizah Nurdin, Azizah Azwar Azwar Darsul S Puyu Erwin Hafid Irma Sakti Juniarti Iryani La Ode Ismail Ahmad Mohamad Ibnu Rusyd Halim Muhammad Idris Muhammad Rafi’iy Rahim Nadyah . Najamuddin Najamuddin Napsawati Napsawati Nelia Syafriawati Nomarihi Goraahe Nurul Annisa Putriany, Putriany Rahmi Dewanti Palengkey Ra’fah Jamilah Saadah Sapinah Siti Aisyah Kara St. Aisyah Kara Sumarni Sumai, Sumarni Ulfah Rimayanti Umar, Siddiq Aminullah Usman DP Yusdarina Yusdarina Zulfahmi Alwi