Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.953
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology Community Empowerment Journal of Engineering Environtmental Energy and Science Jurnal AKAL: Abdimas dan Kearifan Lokal Petro : Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Perminyakan JURNAL ABDI MASYARAKAT INDONESIA (JAMIN) Journal of Earth Energy Science, Engineering, and Technology Jurnal Eksakta Kebumian
puri wijayanti
Universitas Trisakti
Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Materials Science & Nanotechnology Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ANALISIS PEMANFAATAN SURFAKTAN MINYAK JELANTAH KONSENTRASI RENDAH UNTUK PROSES PENINGKATAN PEROLEHAN MIGAS Muhammad Ibnu; Lestari Said; Puri Wijayanti; Pauhesti Rusdi; Samsol; Prayang Sunny Yulia
Jurnal Eksakta Kebumian Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL EKSAKTA KEBUMIAN (JEK)
Publisher : Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/jek.v3i2.10078

Abstract

Abstrak Pada tahap pengembangan untuk meningkatkan perolehan minyak bumi terdiri dari 3 tahapan yaitu:primary recovery, secondary recovery, dan tertiary recovery (Enhanced Oil Recovery). Penelitian menggunakan metode Enhanced Oil Recovery di laboratorium Enhanced Oil Recovery Universitas Trisakti. EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery). terdiri dari injeksi kimia,injeksi uap panas, injeksi gas, dan injeksi microbial. Metode EOR yang dilakukan pada penelitian adalah injeksi surfaktan. Konsentrasi surfaktan yang digunakan 0,3%, 0,4%, dan 0,75% dengan variasi temperatur 30o C dan 70o C. Prosedur penelitian diawali dengan pembuatan brine dan pembuatan surfaktan. Kemudian perhitungan sifat fisik larutan dan perhitungan sifat fisik batuan sampel. Pada Surfaktan konsentrasi 0,2%, 0,3%, 0,4%, 0,5%, dan 0,75% dilakukan uji IFT (Interfacial Tension) untuk mendapatkan nilai CMC (Critical Micelle Concentration). Nilai CMC berada di 0,4% pada temperatur 30o C dan 70o C. Kemudian dilakukan saturasi minyak, dilanjutkan dengan injeksi brine dan injeksi surfaktan didapat recovery faktor. Dari penelitian, didapat hasil Recovery faktor yang dilakukan pengujian di konsentrasi 0,3%, 0,4%, dan 0,75% di temperatur 30o C didapat RF sebesar 33%, 45,8%, dan 42,2%. Recovery factor pada konsentrasi 0,3%, 0,4%, dan 0,75% di temperatur 70o C sebesar 37,2%, 55%, dan 46,7%. Dihasilkan recovery faktor yang paling bagus di konsentrasi 0,4% di temperatur 30o C dan 70o C   Kata kunci: Enhanced Oil Recovery,injeksi kimia,injeksi surfaktan, minyak jelantah.   Abstract At the development stage to increase oil recovery, it consists of 3 stages, namely: primary recovery, secondary recovery, and tertiary recovery (Enhanced Oil Recovery). The study used the Enhanced Oil Recovery method in the Enhanced Oil Recovery laboratory at Trisakti University. EOR (Enhanced Oil Recovery). consists of chemical injection, hot steam injection, gas injection, and microbial injection. The EOR method used in this study is surfactant injection. The surfactant concentrations used were 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.75% with variations in temperature of 30o C and 70o C. The research procedure began with making brine and making surfactants. Then the calculation of the physical properties of the solution and the calculation of the physical properties of the rock samples. At 0.2%, 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, and 0.75% surfactants, the IFT (Interfacial Tension) test was performed to obtain the CMC (Critical Micelle Concentration) value. The CMC values were at 0.4% at 30oC and 70oC. Then oil saturation was performed, followed by brine injection and surfactant injection to obtain recovery factor. From the research, it was found that the recovery factor was tested at concentrations of 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.75% at a temperature of 30o C. The RF was 33%, 45.8%, and 42.2%. Recovery factors at concentrations of 0.3%, 0.4%, and 0.75% at a temperature of 70o C were 37.2%, 55%, and 46.7%. The best recovery factor was obtained at a concentration of 0.4% at temperatures of 30o C and 70o C.   Keywords: Enhanced Oil Recovery, chemical injection, surfactant injection, waste cooking oil
Analisa Pengaruh Aditif Arang Kulit Jeruk Pada Surfaktan Terhadap Recovery Factor : Analysis of Effect Orange Peel Charcoal Additive on Surfactant For Recovery Factor Jeremy Ramos Tiopan; Puri Wijayanti
Jurnal Eksakta Kebumian Vol. 3 No. 1 (2022): JURNAL EKSAKTA KEBUMIAN (JEK)
Publisher : Fakultas Teknologi Kebumian dan Energi, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/jek.v3i1.16064

Abstract

ABSTRAK Hingga saat ini kebutuhan akan minyak bumi semakin meningkat dimana penggunaan sumber daya energi dari bahan bakar fosil tidak sebanding dengan produksi yang dilakukan. Sehingga, dikembangkanlah metode dan teknologi baru yaitu Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) dimana dapat meningkatkan perolehan minyak (recovey factor). Pada penelitian kali metode EOR yang digunakan adalah injeksi kimia (chemical injection) dengan menggunakan surfaktan AOS. Penggunaan surfaktan dalam metode injeksi kimia ini bertujuan agar dapat menurunkan nilai tegangan antarmuka pada dua fluida yaitu minyak dan air. Metodologi yang digunakan pada penelitian kali ini menggunakan larutan brine denan salinitas sebesar 5000 ppm, 10000 ppm dan 20000 ppm serta surfaktan AOS dengan konsentrasi sebesar 0.3%, 0.7% dan 1%. Kemudian ditambahkan aditif arang kulit jeruk dengan konsentrasi yang sama seperti surfaktan AOS. Penambahan aditif arang kulit jeruk bertujuan untuk menganalisa pengaruh penambahan arang kulit jeruk pada surfaktan terhadap peningkatan recovery factor yang nantinya akan dibandingkan dengan larutan surfaktan tanpa aditif arang kulit jeruk. Berikutnya larutan tersebut akan dilakukan pengujian densitas, viskositas dan Interfacial Tension (IFT) pada suhu 30 oC dan 80 oC. Hasil pengujian tersebut akan didapatkan larutan yang memiliki IFT terendah. Setelahnya akan dilakukan proses saturasi dan terakhir akan dilakukan injeksi coreflooding menggunakan 2 core yaitu J1 yang diinjeksikan brine dan surfaktan. Kemudian pada core J2 yang diinjeksikan dengan brine dan surfaktan ditambah aditif arang. Pada proses kegiatan coreflooding didapatkan hasil dimana core J1 memperoleh RF total sebesar 40.83% dan core J2 memiliki RF total 46.59%. Kata kunci: Surfaktan AOS, Aditif, Arang Kulit Jeruk, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Recovery Factor ABSTRACT Currently the consumption of petroleum continuous to increases, Which is the use of natural resource of fossils is not comparable than the production which is conducted. For this problem the developed of new methods called Enhanced Oil Recovery, which is can increasing recovery factor. In this study, the method of EOR was used chemical injection in form surfactant AOS. The used of surfactant in this injection methods intended to reduced interfacial tension between two fluids, namely oil and water. The methodology that was used in this research is used brine with salinity levels namely 5.000 ppm, 10.000 ppm and 20.000 ppm also the used of AOS surfactant as a solution with a various concentration namely 0.3 %, 0.7 % and 1 %. And then it would be added orange peel charcoal with concentration same as surfactant AOS concentration. The addition of orange peel charcoal is for analyzing the effect of orange peel charcoal addition into surfactant for increasing recovery factor and for the result that would be compared between to the surfactant without orange peel charcoal. Next, the solution would be tested and calculated of density, viscosity and IFT at the temperatures of 30 oC and 80 oC. The result of the tested would get the solution with the lowest IFT. After that would be process of saturation and for the last would be doing coreflooding test used 2 core namely J1 that will injected by brine and surfactant. And then for core J2 will injected by using brie and surfactant with additive charcoal.  After the coreflooding test have got the result that in core J1 obtained Total RF in amount 40.83% and for the core J2 obtained total RF 46.59%
QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF WATER CONING AND BREAKTHROUGH TIME PREDICTION ON ZNC FIELD Aqlyna Fattahanisa; Rini Setiati; Arinda Ristawati; Puri Wijayanti
Journal of Petroleum and Geothermal Technology Vol 4, No 2 (2023): November
Publisher : Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31315/jpgt.v4i2.10108

Abstract

Given the current public need for oil and gas as a primary energy, all oil and gas companies need to increase production to meet this demand. One of the things companies usually do to achieve this is to evaluate and analyze the productivity of each well. Of course, production decreases from time to time, so the company must try to increase its production. One of the reasons for the decline in oil production from the ZNC-1 well in the ZNC Field is the production of excessive water content. There are several factors that cause excessive water content in oil wells, and this is called water coning. The method used to determine the occurrence of the water cone problem requires qualitative and quantitative analysis. In using qualitative analysis, two analyzes were carried out, including an analysis of the production history of the well and an analysis of the Chan Diagnostic Plot showing bottom-water coning problems with late-time channeling. Meanwhile, based on the quantitative results, the critical flow rate of the ZNC-1 well calculated using the Bornazel and Jeanson method is 167 STB/D. With these results, the value of the critical flow discharge is greater than the actual discharge, which is 291.3 STB/D. Thus it can be ascertained that there has been water coning in the ZNC-1 well. After that, the breakthrough time obtained by the Bournazel and Jeanson method was 361.3 days.
Co-Authors Abdul Hamid Andry Prima Aqlyna Fattahanisa Arinda Ristawati Arinda Ristawati Bayu Satiyawira Budi Wijaya Dalimunthe, Yusraida Khairani Danaparamita Kusumawardhani Doddy Doddy Eka Rizky Foggie Sciorra Gorgeous Wenno Guntur Herlambang Wijanarko Jeremy Ramos Tiopan Lestari Said Listiana Satiawati Mochamad Alfin Riady Muhammad Ibnu Mulia Ginting Mulia Ginting Nadhia Noor Syarifa Nandito Davy Onnie Ridaliani, Onnie Pauhesti Pauhesti Pradiko Pradiko.Z.H Prayang Sunny Yulia Raisha Ummaria Ratih Yuni Astuti Ratnayu Sitaresmi Rini Setiati Rizka Nada Setyani Rosmalia Dita Nugraheni Samsol Sugiatmo Kasmuning Suryo Prakoso, Suryo Syavitri, Dewi Tia Agusta Tia Agusta Untung Sumotarto Widia Yanti Zakia Nurfajrin Darajat