Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Sovereignty and Human Rights: Examining Sustainable Plantation Enterprises in Indonesia Hairan Hairan; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Imam Koeswahyono; Bambang Sugiri
Administrative and Environmental Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/aelr.v5i1.3415

Abstract

The Sovereignty Principle in the Plantations Law legalizes dynamics that disproportionately empower plantation companies while disenfranchising indigenous peoples. Under this principle, plantation permits are granted to companies, not indigenous communities, limiting the latter's involvement in mandatory deliberations set by the law. Consequently, indigenous peoples are coerced into relinquishing their lands in exchange for compensation, leading to the erosion of their collective land rights. This practice is at odds with the protections intended under Article 28D Paragraph (1) and Article 28H Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, which safeguard collective rights to property. The lack of political will to recognize and protect these rights suggests a troubling disregard for the existence and sovereignty of indigenous peoples.
THE POSITION OF AMICUS CURIAE IN THE EVIDENTIARY PROCESS OF CRIMINAL CASES IN INDONESIA I Made Bima Cahyadi; Faizin Sulistio; Bambang Sugiri
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): March
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2666

Abstract

This study examines the role of Amicus Curiae in the Indonesian legal system, particularly its impact on judicial decision-making despite the absence of explicit procedural regulations in the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). Through qualitative analysis of landmark cases, including the Prita Mulyasari case, this research highlights how third-party legal opinions contribute to more just and transparent verdicts. The study identifies key challenges, such as inconsistent acceptance and limited awareness among legal practitioners, while also exploring potential frameworks for institutionalizing Amicus Curiae in both criminal and civil cases. By analyzing comparative legal perspectives and best practices from other jurisdictions, this research advocates for clearer guidelines to enhance its legitimacy and effectiveness in Indonesia. The findings underscore the necessity of formal recognition to strengthen judicial credibility, ensure fairness, and uphold fundamental human rights. Ultimately, institutionalizing Amicus Curiae would foster a more inclusive and participatory legal system, aligning Indonesia’s judiciary with global standards of legal justice and due process.