Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.827
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES WALISONGO Nadwa : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Analisa Proceeding Of The International Seminar and Conference 2015 Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan At-Taqaddum Studia Quranika Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism Al-Dzikra: Jurnal Studi Ilmu al-Quran dan al-Hadits MAGHZA: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur´an dan Tafsir Aqlam: Journal of Islam and Plurality Jurnal Living Hadis Al-Bukhari: Jurnal Ilmu Hadis Al-Tazkiah : Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam Riwayah : Jurnal Studi Hadis Lentera:Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies Maghza: Jurnal Ilmu al-Qur'an and Tafsir ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin Analisa: Journal of Social Science and Religion el-Sunnah: Jurnal Kajian Hadis dan Integrasi Ilmu Contemporary Quran
Ahmad Musyafiq
Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES

 1 
Partial and Comprehensive Understanding: An Analysis of the Interpretation of the Ḥadīṡ of Riddah Punishment Nabih Zaky Al-Fikri, M.; Musyafiq, Ahmad; Rochmawati, Nikmah
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v14i1.43095

Abstract

Ḥadīṡ regarding the punishment of riddah is often debated because partial understandings tend to cause misunderstandings, such as the view that Islam does not provide freedom of religion. A partial understanding of the ḥadīṡ of riddah punishment is often considered contrary to the values of Islamic justice and creates a negative perception of Islamic teachings in modern society. This study aims to analyze the difference between partial and comprehensive approaches in understanding the ḥadīṡ about riddah punishment. Using a qualitative method based on library research, this study examines primary and secondary literature through a descriptive-analytical approach. The study results show that the partial approach tends to ignore other related ḥadīṡ, socio-historical contexts, and maqāsid asy-syarī’ah principles, resulting in rigid interpretations. Instead, a comprehensive approach emphasizes the importance of understanding ḥadīṡ in the context of maqāsid asy-syarī’ah, such as maintaining societal stability and religious freedom. This study recommends using a comprehensive approach to understanding the ḥadīṡ considered controversial, so their interpretation is more relevant to the principles of justice and humanity in Islam, especially in the modern era that upholds the value of freedom.
When Women Disrupt Prayer? Rethinking a Controversial Hadith through Al-Adlabi’s Matan Criticism Wathani, Muhammad Fadhil; Ahmad Musyafiq; Nikmah Rochmawati; Mahadi Rahman; Zufriyatun
JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/quhas.v14i2.46533

Abstract

The hadith that mentions women, donkeys, and dogs can cancel prayers when passing in front of people who pray has caused controversy, mainly because it is considered to contain gender bias. This study aims to examine the validity of the matan hadith through the approach of matan criticism according to al-Adlabi in Manhaj Naqd al-Matn 'Inda 'Ulamā' al-Ḥadīth al-Nabawī. The method employed is a literature study that involves tracing the hadith in al-Kutub al-Tis'ah and analyzing it based on four criteria: conformity with the Qur'an, sahih hadith, the Prophet's sirah, rationality, and historical context, as well as editorial feasibility. The results of the analysis show that, although the sanad of the hadith is considered authentic, it contains problems: it is not in line with the Qur'an, it contradicts Aisha's history and the Prophet's practice, and it juxtaposes women with animals in the context of worship. This study emphasizes the importance of critically analyzing the hadith so that our understanding of it remains in harmony with the values of justice, common sense, and humanity in Islam.
Co-Authors A. Hasan Asy’ari ‘Ulama`i Achmad, Dliya'uddin Ahmad Hasan Asy’ari Ulama’i ainul azhari azhari Asna Istifada Azhar, Fakhrijal Ali Darsini . . Deby Maulina Fajar Imam Nugroho Fakhrijal Ali Azhar Firdaus, Danang Hawa Hasna Hakimah Hilalinnisa, Khuriyatul Hosen, Mat Ikhlasul Amal Mahadi Rahman Mohammad Abdul Aziz Muhammad Badrus Sholeh Mustaqim, Afif Nabih Zaky Al-Fikri, M. Nafisatun Nuri Nikmah Rochmawati Nikmaturrahmah Nikmaturrahmah Nikmaturrahmah, Nikmaturrahmah Nor Lutfi Fais Nuri, Nafisatun Saifuddin, Fathan Ghifari Wathani, Muhammad Fadhil Zufriyatun