Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.431
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal STUDIA ISLAMIKA Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies Masyarakat Indonesia Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Jurnal Penelitian Politik Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Studia Islamika
Firman Noor
Centre for Political Studies, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI)
Religion Humanities Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 22 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Studia Islamika

 1 
Moderate Islamic Fundamentalism: Understanding the Political Thinking of the Partai Keadilan Sejahtera (PKS) Noor, Firman
Studia Islamika Vol. 14 No. 3 (2007): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v14i3.546

Abstract

This article proposed the term moderate fundamentalism, as a tool in understanding the defining characteristic of the PKS. In short, the term refers to fundamentalism in a moderate perspective, enabling moderate fundamentalists to be involved in political activities adaptively and without resorting to the use of radical means. Using this term, I argue that the PKS is a part of the fundamentalist faction, differentiating it in principle from other modernist groups or parties in Indonesia. Its moderate nature, however, also differentiates it from the radical camps within the fundamentalist faction. The use of the term moderate fundamentalism allows for the observation of diversity within the fundamentalist faction and contributes to new insights into present-day Indonesian Islamic political parties.DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v14i3.546
Leadership and Ideological Bond: PPP and Internal Fragmentation in Indonesia Noor, Firman
Studia Islamika Vol. 23 No. 1 (2016): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v23i1.2808

Abstract

During 2014-2016, the United Development Party (PPP) experienced the most severe and prolonged internal fragmentation in its history. Since the beginning of 2014, the emergence of the twin Board of the Central Committee cemented the fragmentation that had occurred. Some people relate this phenomenon to the interests of the elites. However, the interest of the elites itself is something inevitable and in many cases is not necessarily the cause for prolonged fragmentation. The aim of this article, therefore, is to explain the factors that lead to the internal fragmentation. This article regards three main root-causes of the problem, namely (1) weak leadership, in particular the absence of a strong patron, which facilitates cadres’ unrestricted freedom of action and makes them unable to maintain the Party unity, (2) the lack of an ideological bond that leads to the growth of exclusive-pragmatism, and (3) external factors, namely the government and coalition partners that are eager to preserve each conflicting group’s position.DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v23i1.2808
Iḥtijājāt jamāhīrīyah fī al-ḥarakāt al-ijtimāʿīyah: Dirāsat muqāranah bayna aḥdāth ḥadīqat Ghezi al-Turkīyah wa ḥarakat al-difāʿ ʿan al-Islām al-Indūnīsīyah Ummah, Aniqotul; Perdana, Aditya; Noor, Firman
Studia Islamika Vol. 31 No. 3 (2024): Studia Islamika
Publisher : Center for Study of Islam and Society (PPIM) Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36712/sdi.v31i3.41215

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the motives, goals, and mobilizing actors of the Gezi Park protests in Turkey in 2013 and the Aksi Bela Islam (ABI-Islamic defenders’ action) protests in Indonesia in 2016. The study finds that while both protests have strong Islamic historical roots, their underlying motives are significantly different. The Gezi Park protests were driven by government policies regarding the relocation of the park for commercial purposes, whereas the IDF protests were triggered by a statement made by the former Governor of Jakarta, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama, which was deemed blasphemous to Islam. Both movements share a common mobilizing factor, including the construction of easily understandable narratives for the masses. The ABI amplified public anger by emphasizing the importance of defending Islamic theological values that had been insulted, calling for collective prayer with prominent religious leaders as its key actors. On the other hand, the Gezi Park protests amplified public anger by voicing resistance against state brutality.
Co-Authors Esty Ekawati, Esty Herdiawanto, Heri Lili Romli, Lili Muntafa, Farhan Perdana Aditya, Perdana Priohutomo, Hardianto Ridho Imawan Hanafi, Ridho Imawan Sarah Nuraini Siregar, Sarah Nuraini Sepriwasa, David Siregar, Sarah Sweinstani, Mouliza K.D ummah, Aniqotul VALINA SINGKA SUBEKTI, VALINA SINGKA Yusra, Amri