Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal ULTIMATICS

Test Case Analysis with Keyword-Driven Testing Approach on Angkasa Website Using Katalon Studio Tools Reynaldi Prama Octavially; Rosa Reska Riskiana; Kusuma Ayu Laksitowening; Dana Sulistyo Kusumo; Monterico Adrian; Nungki Selviandro
Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika Vol 13 No 2 (2021): Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika
Publisher : Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, Universitas Multimedia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31937/ti.v13i2.2391

Abstract

Abstract— Testing a software is an important stage of a series of software development. Functional testing of each feature on the Angkasa website is intended to try out the function to match the required specifications. To achieve a functional test result, there are elements of features on the web page that require keywords. These keywords are used to perform actions or actions in running a web page, these keywords will help in making Test Cases for the testing process. Because it takes the right keywords to test on the web. To overcome this problem, this study analyzes the use of the Keyword Driven Testing approach for making Test Cases through the Katalon Studio tools. Keyword Driven Testing is one of the concepts in ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119, namely Keyword Driven Testing in The Test Design Process. The results of the analysis show that making Test Cases with Keyword Driven testing is easier to understand and is fully supported by the Katalon Studio tools. However, when creating test cases, not all keywords can be added automatically, so they need to be added manually.
Comparative Study of Robot Framework and Cucumber as BDD Automated Testing Tools Khaerunnisa Khaerunnisa; Nungki Selviandro; Rosa Reska Riskiana
ULTIMATICS Vol 15 No 1 (2023): Ultimatics : Jurnal Teknik Informatika
Publisher : Faculty of Engineering and Informatics, Universitas Multimedia Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31937/ti.v15i1.3228

Abstract

Automation testing is much more efficient and accurate, the script is easy to document, and update compared to manual testing. Testing a website may necessitate time and effort to learn the tools to be used. Cucumber and Robot Framework are well-known open-source frameworks, according to Stack Overflow and GitHub. Cucumber and Robot Framework are known on an international scale, especially Robot Framework, which is often used by large companies. Each uses the Java and Python languages, which both support BDD. The comparative efforts of the two tools aim to help testers compare and determine automated testing tools in the BisOps Logee Port Web Admin case study based on the effectiveness and efficiency of the tools and create specific test cases as test documentation so that testers do not need to spend time analyzing both. Because this research involves evaluation and comparison, several criteria were chosen to support the evaluation process, namely functionality, reliability, usability, performance efficiency, and portability. The results of this study show that both tools can be recommended for novice QA's who want to learn the basics of automation by implementing BDD. Meanwhile, for QA's who have done automation before and want to do more in-depth configuration and reporting, it is recommended to use Robot Framework because the syntax is short, has lots of keywords that make it easier for testers, and can make the testing system shorter but more specific.