Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Prancangan Aplikasi Sistem Pakar Untuk Diagnosis Periodontal Suhaeri Suhaeri; Fawzan Ramadhan; Chaerita Maulani; Elan Suherlan; Sri Puji Utamima
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Unimus Vol 5 (2022): Inovasi Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Guna Menunjang Pencapaian Sustainable Developm
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

European Federation of Periodontology telah mengeluarkan buku decision tree untuk memudahkan penentuan diagnosis. Decision tree yang sudah dibuat lengkap dapat digunakan untuk menentukan klasifikasi periodontal lebih mudah. Tetapi belum ada sistem diagnosis aplikasi yang berebasis Android.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan suatu aplikasi berbasis android untuk mendiagnosis pasien yang diduga terdiagnosis penyakit periodontal. Metode yang digunakan pada penelitian ini yaitu Incremental, incremental merupakan model dari SDLC. Berdasarkan hasil pengujian yang dilakukan dengan metode Usability Testing, dari hasil tes yang dilakukan aplikasi ini mendapatkan skor 80 dari 100 yang dianggap layak untuk digunakan. Berdasarkan tinjauan islam dari Perancangan Aplikasi SistemPakar UntukĀ  Diagnosis Periodontal aplikasi ini dapat mempermudah para dokter dalam mendiagnosis. Kata Kunci : Sistem pakar, Diagnosis Periodontal, Penyakit Gigi.
Analysis Of The Gap Between The Process Of Forming Legislation And The Decision Process Of The Constitutional Court Suhaeri Suhaeri
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v3i1.1054

Abstract

This article explains the gap between what was decided in the legislative process and the decision given by the Constitutional Court. This type of research is qualitative research with a normative juridical approach. As well as descriptive analysis methods. The results of this research show that the gap between the legislative process and the decision of the Constitutional Court occurs at the stage of discussing the bill and its academic text which is carried out only by the DPR and the President and DPD, while in the Constitutional Court the most decisive stage is at the trial examination stage and the Judges Deliberation Meeting ( RPH) which is the stage of deciding a case carried out by selected and selected judges who certainly have a better quality of understanding in understanding the 1945 Republic of Indonesia Constitution. It is important to maintain harmonization between the legislative process and the decisions of the Constitutional Court to maintain justice and order in society, then the proposal of this article is that the national legislative body should establish a Court like the Constitutional Court which consists of judges who are selected in the same manner as judges are elected in the Constitutional Court. These judges will later be tasked with providing plenary decisions on a legislative process.