Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pekerja dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Meiske Abdullah; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3298

Abstract

The government needs to strengthen the industrial relations dispute resolution system so that it is more accessible to workers. This strengthening can be carried out through the equitable distribution of Industrial Relations Courts, simplification of litigation procedures, improvement of legal aid services, and assistance for workers who lack an understanding of labor law. The use of e-court also needs to be optimized, but it must be accompanied by digital literacy and supporting facilities so that it does not create new obstacles. In addition, a special enforcement mechanism should be established in industrial relations cases so that Industrial Relations Court decisions can be implemented immediately and workers’ rights are not delayed. Judges, mediators, labor inspectors, and labor unions also need to improve their capacity and commitment to substantive justice. Employers are expected to comply with court decisions voluntarily and prioritize deliberative settlement from the initial stage. Through these reforms, the Industrial Relations Court will not merely serve as a formal forum, but will truly function as a means of legal protection that is fast, affordable, certain, and just for workers.
Analisis Efisiensi Tiga Mekanisme Pengakuan Bersalah dalam KUHAP 2025: Pasal 78, Pasal 205, dan Pasal 234 Erfan Afandi; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3300

Abstract

The reform of criminal procedural law through Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code introduced a confession of guilt through three mechanisms spread across Article 78, Article 205, and Article 234. All three have different entry points, requirements, and examination patterns, but all lead to a brief examination. This study aims to analyze the construction and efficiency of these three mechanisms, while identifying overlaps, repetition of stages, and potential uncertainty in their application. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. The results show that Article 78 forms a written agreement mechanism between the public prosecutor and the defendant before the main case examination; Article 205 opens up the defendant's confession after peace efforts are not achieved; while Article 234 allows for a transfer to a brief examination when the defendant admits all charges when the indictment is read. Although intended to expedite the resolution of cases, these three routes are not yet fully efficient because they still go through a series of prosecution, transfer, preliminary hearing or reading of the indictment, verification of the confession, and a brief examination which in certain cases can be longer than normal trial practice. In conclusion, the primary issue is no longer defining the requirements for cases that can use a guilty plea, as these are already stipulated in the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), but rather harmonizing the three mechanisms to ensure simplicity, consistency, and the absence of additional procedural layers.
Kedudukan Ekspedisi Kotag Cargo dalam Perspektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen dan Hukum Pengangkutan Abdul Mutalib Abdul Aziz; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i3.3297

Abstract

The development of digital trade and interregional goods distribution has increased public demand for expedition services that are fast, safe, transparent, and accountable. Kotag Cargo, as a shipping service provider, has a legal relationship with consumers, particularly when delays, damage, loss, or discrepancies in delivery services occur. This study aims to analyze the legal position of Kotag Cargo from the perspective of consumer protection law and transportation law, as well as to examine the forms of legal protection and corporate liability when consumers suffer losses. This research uses a normative juridical method by examining statutory regulations, legal principles, doctrines, and relevant literature. The results show that Kotag Cargo may be positioned as a shipping service business actor, freight forwarder, carrier, or intermediary, depending on its factual role in the delivery process. However, any such legal position does not eliminate its legal responsibility toward consumers. Legal protection is provided preventively through clear information and repressively through claim mechanisms and compensation. It is recommended that Kotag Cargo clarify its service clauses, claim procedures, delivery standards, and compensation mechanisms so that consumer rights are protected fairly and transparently.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pengendara atas Pemalsuan Surat Samsat dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia Lindriyani Hamzah; Roy Marthen Moonti
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i3.3299

Abstract

This study examines the criminal liability of motorists for falsifying Samsat (Vehicle Registration Certificate) documents from the perspective of Indonesian criminal law. The background of this study is based on the importance of Samsat documents, such as the Vehicle Registration Certificate (STNK), Vehicle Registration Certificate (TNKB), and proof of vehicle tax approval, as proof of motor vehicle legality. Falsification of these documents not only raises administrative issues but also has the potential to constitute a criminal act of document forgery, disrupting legal certainty, administrative order, and public trust in official state documents. This study aims to analyze the forms of criminal liability of motorists and examine gaps in law enforcement regarding Samsat document forgery. The type of research used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches. The results indicate that motorists can be held criminally liable if they are proven to know or reasonably suspect that the Samsat document they are using is counterfeit, but continue to use it to gain profit, avoid inspection, or legalize problematic vehicles. This liability can take the form of using the counterfeit document, creating the counterfeit document, participating in the crime, or committing a continuing act. However, law enforcement still faces challenges in proving fault, weak digital verification, and suboptimal disclosure of forgery networks. Therefore, proportional, evidence-based law enforcement supported by the integration of the Samsat (State Vehicle Registration Agency) system is necessary.
Syarat Objektif dan Subjektif Penahanan dalam KUHAP 2025 Moh. Firda Mb. Husain; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6431

Abstract

This study analyzes the objective and subjective requirements for detention based on Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, particularly the cumulative relationship between the requirements and the need for standardization of evidence. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through literature studies, then analyzed qualitatively with grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretations. The results of the study indicate that the objective requirements in the form of a criminal threat of five years or more or certain criminal acts are only the initial legal limits. Detention is only valid if supported by at least two valid pieces of evidence, there is at least one concrete situation as stipulated in Article 100 paragraph (5), and is stated in a warrant or judge's decision containing specific reasons. The 2025 Criminal Procedure Code has shifted the basis for detention from abstract concerns to more concrete behavioral indicators. However, some indicators are still evaluative and have the potential to cause differences in interpretation. Therefore, measurable evidentiary parameters, a risk assessment matrix, consideration of non-detention alternatives, documentation of reasons, tiered supervision, and substantive testing through pretrial motions are required. Detention should be considered a measure of last resort that is proportionate, transparent, and testable, and ensures a balance between effective law enforcement and human rights protection. These findings affirm due process of law and respect for the presumption of innocence.
Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Perbankkan terhadap Kerugian Nasabah Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang di Lakukan Pegawai Bank Ibrahim Alfatha Popa; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Doktrin: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Jurnal Dunia Ilmu Hukum dan Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/doktrin.v4i3.6433

Abstract

 This study aims to analyze the form of bank liability for customer losses caused by unlawful acts committed by bank employees, as well as to identify preventive measures that can be implemented to mitigate internal fraud risks. A normative juridical approach is employed, based on statutory regulations, legal doctrines, and case law analysis. Pursuant to Articles 1365 and 1367 of the Indonesian Civil Code, banks, as employers, are held jointly liable (joint liability) for unlawful acts committed by their employees in the course of their duties. The findings reveal that banks are obliged to compensate customers as part of their civil liability and may subsequently exercise their right of recourse (regres) against the employee responsible. Furthermore, the research highlights the importance of implementing a comprehensive anti-fraud strategy, including internal control systems, employee integrity training, whistleblowing mechanisms, and technology-based monitoring. Strengthening these preventive and accountability measures can reduce the likelihood of employee misconduct and help maintain public trust. This study is expected to serve as both an academic reference and practical guidance for enhancing consumer protection in the Indonesian banking sector.
Algorithmic Constitutionalism dan Masa Depan Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia: Menakar Batas Kekuasaan Algoritmik dalam Pengambilan Keputusan Publik Mariyanti Mile; Roy Marthen Moonti
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6432

Abstract

The digital transformation of government has introduced algorithms and artificial intelligence as new instruments in public decision-making. This change raises constitutional issues because state decisions are no longer entirely implemented through officials and administrative procedures, but also through computational systems that are at risk of being closed, biased, discriminatory, and difficult to account for. This article aims to analyze the development of the concept of algorithmic constitutionalism and its relevance to the future of Indonesian constitutional law, particularly in limiting algorithmic power in the public sector. The method used is a literature review by examining books, journal articles, institutional reports, regulations, and policy documents related to digital constitutionalism, algorithmic governance, algorithmic accountability, personal data protection, and government administrative law. The analysis is conducted descriptively and qualitatively through concept identification, literature mapping, comparison of findings, and normative synthesis. The results of the review indicate that Indonesia already has a regulatory basis through the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the Public Service Law, the Government Administration Law, the Public Information Disclosure Law, the Personal Data Protection Law, and the SPBE policy, but the regulations are still fragmented and do not specifically regulate the accountability of algorithm-based public decisions. This article concludes that public algorithms should be understood as a form of state power that must adhere to the principles of legality, meaningful transparency, the right to explanation, auditability, human control, non-discrimination, objection, remedy, proportionality, and public participation.
Rekonstruksi Penanganan Perkara Pidana melalui Restorative Justice Berbasis Kepastian Hukum di Polda Gorontalo Wawan Thaib; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/deposisi.v4i2.6434

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of restorative justice in handling criminal cases at the Gorontalo Regional Police and formulate a reconstruction model based on legal certainty and protection of victims' rights. The study uses empirical legal methods with a juridical-sociological, legislative, and conceptual approach. Primary data were obtained through interviews with investigators, victims, perpetrators, legal advisors, and community leaders, while secondary data were sourced from laws and regulations, books, journals, decisions, and case documents. Data were analyzed qualitatively through reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions. The results of the study indicate that the application of restorative justice still faces differences in interpretation of material and formal requirements, lack of uniformity in case eligibility indicators, weak inter-institutional coordination, and suboptimal guarantees of voluntariness and victim recovery. Peace is often still understood administratively through a written agreement, without ensuring the implementation of restitution, rehabilitation, security protection, and prevention of re-victimization. Therefore, reconstruction is needed in the form of technical guidelines, case assessment matrices, victim loss and vulnerability assessments, tiered case titles, professional assistance, an integrated database, and a monitoring mechanism for the implementation of the agreement. This model is expected to achieve consistent, transparent, accountable, and substantively just case handling, while also providing legal certainty for victims, perpetrators, law enforcement officials, and the community. This reconstruction also places the fulfillment of victims' rights as the primary measure of successful criminal case resolution through a sustainable restorative approach.
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik Minarti Usman; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli: Aktivisme: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Politik dan Sosial Indonesia
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aktivisme.v3i3.1831

Abstract

Criminal acts of insult and defamation are acts that attack a person's honor and reputation, either directly or through electronic media. This study aims to analyze the legal provisions and law enforcement for criminal acts of insult and defamation in the Criminal Code and Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law). The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory regulatory approach and literature review. The results indicate that defamation is regulated by Article 433 of the Criminal Code and Article 27A of the ITE Law, while law enforcement is carried out through investigation, inquiry, prosecution, and court hearings. In practice, law enforcement still faces obstacles in the form of differing interpretations, difficulties in proving digital evidence, and limited facilities and capabilities of law enforcement officers. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the capacity of law enforcement officers and increase public legal awareness to achieve effective law enforcement in the digital era.
Analisis terhadap Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Indonesia Sumargil Sikome; Roy Marthen Moonti
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v3i3.1834

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has increased the collection, storage, and processing of personal data, leading to a higher risk of data breaches and misuse. To ensure the protection of personal data rights, the Indonesian Government enacted Law Number 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Law Number 27 of 2022, examine the legal protection of personal data, and assess the roles of the government, electronic system operators, and the public in supporting its implementation. This research employs a normative legal research method using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The findings indicate that Law Number 27 of 2022 provides a comprehensive legal framework for personal data protection. However, its implementation is still constrained by the lack of implementing regulations, the absence of an effective supervisory institution, the low level of compliance among electronic system operators, and limited public awareness regarding personal data protection. Therefore, strengthening implementing regulations, enhancing supervisory mechanisms, and improving public education and awareness are essential to achieving effective personal data protection and ensuring legal certainty.