Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.782
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Al-Ahkam Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Journal of SouthEast Asian Human Rights Kosmik Hukum Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Idea Hukum JHCLS Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Soedirman Law Review
Kuat Puji Prayitno
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Al-Ahkam

 1 
Islamic Law Analysis of the Prosecutor's Authority in Asset Forfeiture from Corruption Utama, Budi; Angkasa, Angkasa; Prayitno, Kuat Puji; Sudrajat, Tedi; Najib, Muhammad Ainun
Al-Ahkam Vol. 35 No. 2 (2025): October
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia and Law, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21580/ahkam.2025.35.2.26343

Abstract

Efforts to recover assets resulting from corruption remain hindered by legal loopholes and concealment strategies, especially when offenders register illicit assets under the names of third parties. This study explores how prosecutors perceive the legitimacy of such assets and their views on the necessity of reforming Indonesia’s asset forfeiture framework. Using a qualitative empirical design, the research is based on semi-structured interviews with four prosecutors who have handled corruption cases involving complex asset ownership. The findings reveal that prosecutors consistently view these assets as materially and morally illegitimate, even if formally registered under others' names. They also support introducing a non-conviction-based asset forfeiture (NCBAF) model to overcome the limitations of conviction-dependent mechanisms, especially in cases where suspects die or flee. Islamic legal principles, such as the ḥifẓ al-māl (preservation of wealth) and taʿzīr bi al-māl or discretionary penalties targeting unlawfully acquired assets, offer a moral and doctrinal basis for such reforms. These insights contribute to ongoing legal debates and support the development of a more effective and ethically grounded policy for asset recovery in corruption cases.
Co-Authors Agus Raharjo Angkasa Angkasa Arifah Nur’aina Barkhuizen, Jaco Berlian, Hangrengga Budi Utama, Budi BUDIYONO Budiyono Budiyono Cendy Cendy Dwi Hapsari Retnaningrum Dwiki Oktobrian Fajar Triyantoro Febrian, Uci Hendriana, Rani Heradhyaksa, Bagas Hibnu Nugroho Icuk Rangga Bawono Icuk Rangga Bawono, Icuk Rangga Ismail, Noorfajri Jie Liu, Jie Kinanti, Hidayah Arum Muhammad Ainun Najib, Muhammad Ainun Rahadi Wasi Bintoro riska nurfadilah Setya Wahyudi Syaiful Anwar Tedi Sudrajat Utami, Nurani Ajeng Tri Widodo, Selamat Zulhuda, Sony