Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.295
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Varia Justicia Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Reformasi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik SIGn Jurnal Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Idea Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) Journal of Lex Generalis (JLG) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Fahri Bachmid
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muslim Indonesia
Humanities Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities

 1 
The Position of the Letter from the Chief of the Supreme Court and the Decision of the Constitutional Court in the Polemic on the Advocate's Oath Wahab, Mirnawanti; Bachmid, Fahri
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (January - February 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i2.319

Abstract

To carry out the profession of an advocate, a person must go through various stages regulated in the Law on advocates, including the process of education and appointment through oaths. However, the publication of the Letter of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia regarding the oath of advocates has created a polemic among law enforcement. This study aims to examine two main issues: first, the substance and position of the Letter of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia regarding advocate oaths; and second, the substance and position of the Advocate Organization's Constitutional Court Decision. As doctrinal legal research, this study uses statutory and contextual approaches to secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the analysis conclude that the Letter of Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is recognized as a product of laws and regulations in Indonesia, so it must comply with the principles regarding statutory regulations. However, it is considered that this policy cannot become a binding legal product because it is considered contradictory to the law on advocacy organizations. This was justified by the Constitutional Court's decision, which considered that there was an error in the substance of the letter. The Court, in its legal considerations, then determined the Indonesian Advocates Association (PERADI) as the only advocate organization that was given eight authorities, including carrying out Advocate Profession Special Education (PKPA), Advocate Professional Examination, and carrying out the oath of attorney candidates
Co-Authors Abd Wahid Abdul Rahman Achdian Anggreni Bangsawan Achmad Nadhil Edar Arfandi Ahmad Diani Indah Rachmitasari Hafidz, Ma'ruf Hardianto Djanggih Harpiana Rahman Hasmin Hasmin, Hasmin Irfan Pratama, Muhammad Ismail Rumadhan Ma'ruf Hafidz Mariany M Lintjewas Mirnawanti Wahab, Mirnawanti Muin Fahmal Muin, Sri Amlinawaty A Nurdin P, Zamharira Pri Pambudi Teguh Rahman, Sufirman Ramdaniyah Ramdaniyah Rumadhan, Ismail Syafruddin Muhtamar Syamsul Alam Teguh, Pri Pambudi Yosua Marcelino