Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.395
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum NOTARIUS LAW REFORM Jurnal Hukum Progresif Diponegoro Law Review Halu Oleo Law Review Lex Scientia Law Review Unes Law Review Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Gema Wiralodra JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal CREPIDO: Jurnal Mengenai Dasar-Dasar Pemikiran Hukum Filsafat dan Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Aju Putrijanti
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Kekuatan Hukum Akta Penegasan Untuk Tindakan Daluwarsa Pendaftaran Akta Jaminan Fidusia Dinda Prasetiani, Norika; Putrijanti, Aju
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.1948

Abstract

The fiduciary guarantee deed must be registered inaccordance with applicable laws and regulations within 30 (thirty) days after the deed is drawn up. However,there are times when the fiduciary deed is registered late by the notary or the parties. To overcome this delay, the notary makes a deed of confirmation to re-register the fiduciary guarantee deed that is registered too late. This study uses a type of normative legal research, using a statutory approach. The normative juridical approach is carried out by examining various formal legal rules such as laws, regulations, and literature that contains theoretical concepts related to the topic and problem of this research. The results of this study indicate that the validity of the affirmation deed made before a notary public due to the expiration date of the registration of the fiduciary deed is legally valid, but the existence of the affirmation deed cannot replace the position of the fiduciary deed because the contents of the affirmation deed and the fiduciary deed are very different. Delay in registeringthe deed has implications for defects in the fiduciary guarantee deed,making a new deed would be better done than using an affirmation deed that has no legal basis in the law. An affirmation deed made for a fiduciary guarantee that is registered too latecannot provide legal protection to the parties because a deed that is registered too late does not have an executorial title. The deed of confirmation of a fiduciary guarantee appears to accommodate a deed of fiduciary security that has passed the registration deadline. The technique for making a deed of confirmation of a fiduciary guarantee is still made before a notary and in the premise of the deed it is stated that a fiduciary deed has not previously been registered.
Penerapan Hukum Humaniter oleh Mahkamah Pidana Internasional Terhadap Konflik Kemanusiaan Israel-Palestina Berdasarkan Statuta Roma 1998 Fajar Ibrahim; Putrijanti, Aju
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2157

Abstract

-
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perceraian Disebabkan Salah Satu Pihak Homoseksual Hutagalung, Welly Angriani; Putrijanti, Aju
Notarius Vol 18, No 4 (2025): Notarius
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/nts.v18i4.74100

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study analyzes the juridical aspects of divorce caused by one party engaging in homosexual behavior. The purpose of this research is to examine the legal basis, judicial considerations, and legal consequences of Divorce Decision Number 3714/Pdt.G/2021/PA Cibinong. The research employs a normative approach by analyzing court decision documents and relevant laws. The results show that the judge, in Decision Number 3714/Pdt.G/2021/PA Cibinong, granted the divorce due to the Defendant’s homosexual behavior, which led to continuous conflict, based on considerations balancing the values of maslahah (public interest) and legal certainty. This decision affirms that divorce due to homosexual orientation entails legal consequences for the marital relationship, child custody, and alimony obligations, aiming to achieve justice, public welfare, and legal certainty for the parties involved.Keywords: Divorce; Homosexual; Legal ConsequencesABSTRAKPenelitian ini menganalisis aspek yuridis perceraian yang disebabkan oleh salah satu pihak yang berperilaku homoseksual. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menelaah dasar hukum, pertimbangan hakim, dan akibat hukum putusan perceraian Nomor 3714/Pdt.G/2021/PA Cibinong. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan normatif dengan studi dokumen putusan pengadilan dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Hakim dalam Putusan Nomor 3714/Pdt.G/2021/PA. Cibinong memutus perceraian karena perilaku homoseksual Tergugat yang menimbulkan konflik berkelanjutan, dengan pertimbangan yang menyeimbangkan nilai maslahah dan kepastian hukum. Putusan ini menegaskan bahwa perceraian akibat orientasi homoseksual membawa konsekuensi hukum terhadap hubungan suami istri, hak asuh anak, dan kewajiban nafkah, dengan tujuan mewujudkan keadilan, kemaslahatan, serta kepastian hukum bagi para pihak.Kata Kunci: Perceraian; Homoseksual; Akibat Hukum
EXPLORING INTERSECTIONALITY: THE LEGAL CHALLENGES FACED BY INDIGENOUS WOMEN IN PALM OIL LAND CONFLICTS Natalis, Aga; Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei; Aspin N, Ester Elisabeth; Hardiyanti, Marzellina; Putrijanti, Aju
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Diponegoro Law Review October 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.173-198

Abstract

This study explores the dual challenges faced by indigenous women in palm oil land conflicts through an intersectionality framework to understand their unique oppression. In Indonesia, the palm oil industry’s expansion has exacerbated gender-based, ethnic, economic, and ecological injustices faced by these women. Indigenous women are often excluded from decision-making processes regarding land disputes and development projects, leading to the loss of vital resources that sustain their livelihoods. This research demonstrates that these women bear an additional burden of domestic responsibilities, which are largely unrecognised, while also being marginalised in the socio-political and legal spheres. Through an intersectional lens, this study unveils the complex interactions of gender, ethnicity, and class, which create distinct forms of oppression, complicating the struggle of indigenous women to protect their land and culture. These conflicts are not simply issuing of agriculture; they represent a broader fight for recognition, autonomy, and the protection of ecosystems. In conclusion, the legal and policy frameworks often fail to adequately address the rights of indigenous women, highlighting the need for inclusive policies that ensure their participation in decision-making processes. It argues for the recognition of their ecological knowledge and cultural heritage in addressing and resolving land conflicts.
An Analysis of Justice in Tapera Based on the Perspective of Jurgen Habermas' Critical Theory and John Rawls' Theory of Justice Firdaus, Kusuma; Utama, Yos Johan; Putrijanti, Aju
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5062

Abstract

Government Regulation Number 21 of 2024 was designed and issued to help Indonesian people who need financial support to own their first home. However, a few days after the regulation was enacted, the People's Housing Savings (Tapera) policy drew criticism from the public. This program is considered to burden low-income workers and is not fair enough for people from the middle to upper income group. This research aims to apply both theories, namely Jurgen Habermas's Critical Theory and John Rawls' Theory of Justice in the context of the Tapera Program.This research is a normative legal research using a statute approach. Data collection was carried out through literature studies of various legal sources and journals about Tapera.  The results of the study show that based on the perspective of Jurgen Habermas's Critical Theory and John Rawls' Theory of Justice, he emphasizes the importance of transparency, active participation, and protection of individual rights in the implementation of Tapera's policies. Based on Habermas' perspective, an inclusive public space is needed to ensure the participation of all parties in discussions and decision-making related to Tapera, with the aim of achieving social justice through rational communication. Meanwhile, Rawls' theory of justice emphasizes equal access to basic opportunities and a fair distribution of benefits for Tapera participants, regardless of social or economic status. The evaluation of Tapera's policies needs to consider these aspects to ensure justice in accordance with the social and democratic principles advocated by these two theories.
Execution of The Right to be Forgotten in Indonesia: The Urgency of the Requirements for the Determination and Establishment of the Assessment Body Sugeng Sulistyo, Trisoko; Johan Utama, Yos; Putrijanti, Aju
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i3.5596

Abstract

The Right to be Forgotten has been recognized in the Information and Electronic Transactions Law (ITE) and the Personal Data Protection Law (PDP), but has not been regulated in detail. The ITE Law and the PDP Law do include provisions on the right to be forgotten, but there is no specific explanation of the conditions that must be met to establish what rights can be removed as part of the Right to Be Forgotten. In addition, there is no special assessment body tasked with determining and assessing these conditions. This ambiguity causes the implementation of the Right to be Forgotten to be hampered in Indonesia. This journal aims to provide recommendations for policymakers to improve related regulations so that the implementation of the Right to be Forgotten can run effectively in Indonesia so that it has benefits for law enforcement in Indonesia. The method used in this journal is normative juridical research with a statute approach. The results of the study show that in order for the implementation of The Right to be Forgotten to be more effective, it is necessary to prepare clearer determination requirements and the establishment of an independent assessment body that can handle applications fairly and transparently.
Perseroan Komanditer sebagai Subjek Kepailitan dan Akibat Hukum Putusan terhadap Sekutu serta Kreditor: Studi Putusan PN Niaga Medan Nomor 6/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024/PN Niaga Mdn Lathifah, Putri Laily Ulya; Putrijanti, Aju
UNES Law Review Vol. 8 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/sa921m74

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara kepailitan terhadap Perseroan Komanditer serta akibat hukum yang ditimbulkannya. Objek dalam penelitian ini yaitu Putusan PN Niaga Medan Nomor 6/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2024/PN Niaga Mdn. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim dalam menetapkan CV yang bukan sebuah badan hukum sebagai debitur pailit serta mengkaji akibat hukum dari putusan tersebut. Penelitian menggunakan metode penelitian doktrinal. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hakim menerima permohonan pailit dengan mendasarkan pada legal standing kreditor sesuai Pasal 2 ayat (1) jo. Pasal 8 ayat (4) UUK, yakni adanya dua kreditor atau lebih, utang jatuh tempo yang tidak dibayar, serta pembuktian sederhana. Pertimbangan hakim berdasarkan UUK, sehingga CV dapat dimohonkan pailit. Hal tersebut sesuai dengan asas lex specialis derogat legi generali, dimana aturan UUK yang diutamakan dibandingkan doktrin mengenai subjek hukum. Akibat hukum putusan ini antara lain yaitu, seluruh harta kekayaan sekutu pengurus termasuk harta bersama pasangannya masuk ke boedel pailit, sekutu komanditer hanya bertanggung jawab sebatas modal, debitur kehilangan kewenangan mengurus harta karena beralih ke kurator, serta penghentian penyitaan. Selain itu, putusan juga berakibat hukum bagi pemohon pailit sebagai mantan karyawan, yang kedudukannya menjadi kreditor preferen berdasarkan Putusan MK No. 67/PUU-XI/201.
Co-Authors Adya Paramita Prabandari Anggraini, Puspa Ariq, Muhammad Aspin N, Ester Elisabeth Ayu Leni Agustini, Dsk Putu Denata, Brigita Cynthia Liwandra Dinda Prasetiani, Norika Fadhilah, Sarah Fajar Ibrahim Fatchullah, Muchamad Ja'abik Firdaus, Kusuma Garunja, Evis Hafidh Prasetyo, Mujiono Hardiyanti, Marzellina Hidayat, Fitri Hutagalung, Welly Angriani Irma Cahyaningtyas, Irma Irmawati, Wiwi Johan Utama, Yos Kadek Cahya Susila Wibawa Kartika Widya Utama Kuning, Fazahra Rimbani Lathifah, Putri Laily Ulya Lumbanraja, Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja, Brata Yoga Lydia Apriliani, Lydia Muchamad Ja'abik Fatchullah Muzizat, Aliff Natalis, Aga Nugraha, Eril Aditya Pratama Herry Herlambang Prayogo, Silvan Susanto Puspitaarum, Indah Putri, Gessy Andrina Rafidah, Nur Atika Sianipar, Gretel Marlene Yola Sugeng Sulistyo, Trisoko Wibowo, Shannon Lorelei Widiyanti, Ida Yos Johan Utama Yudhitiya Dyah Sukmadewi, Yudhitiya Dyah Yumna, Daffa Dzaky