Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Analysis of unlawful acts regarding claims and the unlawful installation of confiscation sign (study of decision number 966/Pdt.G/2024/PN Medan) Sitompul, October Yohanes; Siregar, Fitri Yanni Dewi
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i9.668

Abstract

This study aims to analyze unlawful acts in claims and the unauthorized installation of Sita signs. This study focuses on Decision No. 966/Pdt. G/2024/PN Medan, which involves a dispute between the Plaintiff and the Defendant regarding land rights. In this case, the Defendant installed a sita sign without permission from the Plaintiff, resulting in loss and a violation of ownership rights. To address this issue, references are made to agrarian law theories and relevant regulations. Data were collected through interviews with landowners, lawyers, and government officials, legal document analysis, and observations at the dispute location. The obtained data were analyzed qualitatively to understand the legal practices occurring, and the results of the study indicate that the defendant’s actions can be categorized as unlawful acts in accordance with Article 1365 of the Civil Code, which regulates liability for losses arising from unlawful acts.
State and Fiqh: Examination of the Legal Status of Divorce in Verstek Decision Number 2939/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Mdn Maswandi, Maswandi; Frensh, Wenggedes; Siregar, Fitri Yanni Dewi; Hidayani, Sri
Al-Qadha : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan Vol 11 No 1 (2024): Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan
Publisher : Hukum Keluarga Islam IAIN LANGSA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/qadha.v11i1.8722

Abstract

This research is grounded in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, wherein the presiding magistrate rendered a verdict of Verstek in his consideration of the case. In such cases, the decision is rendered by the court in the absence of either the defendant or their legal representative. The validity of a verstek verdict in the context of the legitimacy of a marriage may be contingent upon the applicable legislation within the jurisdiction in question; thus, this investigation will consider both positive law and Islamic law. The objective of this article is to undertake a critical analysis of the decision rendered in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, which pertains to the use of a verstek decision to terminate a marriage due to childlessness, followed by disputes and quarrels. This research is a normative legal study with a case-based approach. The principal data source is derived from court decisions in the field of marriage law. The analysis reveals that, in Decision Number: 2939/Pdt.G/2023, a verdict of divorce by verstek is considered valid if the stipulated procedures have been followed correctly and the party who is required to be present or provide a defence does not do so without a valid reason. Islamic law also establishes principles of justice and protection of individual rights, including in the marriage process. Accordingly, the legitimacy of a marriage concluded through a verstek verdict may be contingent upon the interpretation of Islamic schools of thought and the legal principles that are embraced. Likewise, in the context of marriage law in Indonesia, a verstek decision in a verstek divorce case can be recognized as valid if it has fulfilled the requirements stipulated in the law. Thus, to determine whether a verstek decision in a marriage is valid or not, it is necessary to consider the applicable legal context, both in terms of civil law and in terms of Islamic law (fiqh) or the applicable marriage law.