Lily Tjahjandari
Department Of Literature, Faculty Of Humanities, Universitas Indonesia

Published : 21 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : sasi

The Liminal Space of Customary Law: Bakar Batu and Legal Pluralism in Papua's Asymmetric Conflict Resolution Kasenda, Donald; Alkatiri, Zeffry; Setyani, Turita Indah; Tjahjandari, Lily
SASI Vol 32 No 3: Volume 32 Issue 3, September 2026
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pattimura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47268/sasi.v32i3.3839

Abstract

Introduction: Papua's prolonged asymmetric conflict illustrates the limitations of formal legal mechanisms in generating legitimacy and facilitating dialogue between state institutions, indigenous communities, and non-state actors. The Bakar Batu tradition provides an important customary setting for reconciliation and intergroup dialogue, yet its legal significance within Indonesia's plural legal order remains insufficiently examined. Purposes of the Research:  This study examines the role and juridical position of Bakar Batu as a customary mediation practice in asymmetric conflict resolution and analyzes the extent to which its customary authority can interact with Indonesia's constitutional and statutory framework. Methods of the Research: The study employs a socio-legal qualitative case-study approach focusing on the SusiAir hostage crisis. Empirical data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with customary leaders, government officials, indigenous community representatives, and customary-law scholars, complemented by analysis of constitutional provisions, legislation, judicial decisions, and relevant secondary sources. Legal pluralism and Turner's concept of liminality were used as analytical frameworks. Results of the Research: The findings indicate that Bakar Batu functions primarily as a culturally legitimate mediation space that facilitates communication, reduces perceived power asymmetries, and strengthens social relationships among actors. Its significance lies less in replacing state law than in complementing formal mechanisms through culturally grounded legitimacy. The study identifies a gap between constitutional recognition of customary communities and the institutional mechanisms available to connect customary mediation with formal conflict-resolution processes.