Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.829
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum LAW REFORM Diponegoro Law Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Sriwijaya Law Review JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Umi Rozah
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Analisa Kebijakan Kriminal dan Filsafat Pemidanaan Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture of Stolen Assets Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Rozah, Umi; Nashriana, Nashriana
Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia Volume 5, Nomor 3, Tahun 2023
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jphi.v5i3.411-432

Abstract

Tindak pidana korupsi bertujuan menguntungkan diri sendiri berupa uang atau harta, yang oleh negara bermanfaat untuk memperbaiki kesejahteraan rakyatnya. Hampir semua koruptor membutuhkan sarana untuk menyembunyikan hasil korupsinya dengan cara mengalihkan hasil korupsinya melalui pencucian uang, baik di dalam negeri atau di luar negeri, sehingga sulit untuk dilacak. Sangat urgen untuk menerapkan Non-Conviction Based Forfeiture of Stolen Assets Recovery (NCB). NCB yang merupakan sebuah mekanisme untuk merampas hasil tindak pidana korupsi dari para koruptor tanpa melalui proses peradilan pidana. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan kebijakan kriminal dan filsafat pemidanaan dalam aplikasi NCB di Indonesia. Artikel ini berdasarkan penelitian, dengan studi doktrinal yang sepenuhnya menggunakan data sekunder seperti literature dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian Pertama, pada kebijakan hukum pidana adalah urgen untuk menerapkan NCB dalam memulihkan aset negara yang dicuri melalui tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Indonesia mengadopsi NCB dengan merumuskannya di dalam Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Perampasan Hasil Tindak Pidana; Kedua, pada konteks filsafat pembenaran diterapkannya NCB mengacu pada asas crime doesn’t pay (pelaku kejahatan tidak mendapatkan keuntungan). Asas ini dianggap sebagai sarana efektif untuk mencegah tindak pidana korupsi, dengan mengambil keuntungan dari para koruptor. Kesimpulan dari artikel ini adalah NCB merupakan sarana non penal yang efektif untuk merampas aset yang dicuri/dikorupsi, dan dalam konteks filsafat NCB sebagai sarana efektif untuk mencegah tindak pidana korupsi.
Regulation of Plea Bargaining Policy as a Novelty in Criminal Justice System to Create Effective and Efficient Criminal Law Enforcement: A Study of Ruu Kuhap Seraphinus Mariano Agung Serman; Umi Rozah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1454

Abstract

The criminal justice system in Indonesia faces various challenges, such as lengthy judicial processes and case backlogs in the courts. To address these issues, reforms in the criminal justice system are necessary, one of which is the implementation of "Plea Bargaining." This writing is very beneficial as it examines the regulation of plea bargaining in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP). The regulation of plea bargaining in the Indonesian criminal justice system provides benefits in creating an effective and efficient criminal law enforcement process, allowing cases to be resolved more quickly and reducing the burden on the judiciary. Plea Bargaining in the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP) is regulated in Article 199 of the Draft Criminal Procedure Code (RUU KUHAP).
URGENSI KEBIJAKAN KRIMINALISASI PENELANTARAN IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN BATUBARA OLEH KORPORASI Simangunsong, Gusfen Alextron; Utama, Yos Johan; Rozah, Umi
LITIGASI Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.18666

Abstract

Development in the mining sector is an integral part of national development which aims to support industrialization programs to provide domestic raw materials and increase state revenues from foreign exchange and open up the widest possible employment opportunities in order to improve welfare. The implementation of mining business activities must begin with the ownership of a Mining Business License granted to business entities, cooperatives and individuals. The conditions that occur in reality record that there are not a few cases of illegal mining that cost the State around 38 trillion per year. It was recorded in 2021 that there were 2,741 unlicensed mining locations spread across 29 provinces in Indonesia. Of these points, there are 2,645 mineral and coal commodities and 96 coal commodity locations. Given the importance of the mining sector, the government positions the mining sector as the livelihood of many people. As mandated by the Constitution Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Law enforcement of the obligations of Coal Mining Business License holders has not been effective, seen from the five factors that have been fulfilled, namely the legal factors themselves, facility factors, law enforcement factors, legal awareness factors, and legal culture factors have not been able to be optimally implemented as they should. Criminalization of abandonment of Coal Mining Business License by corporations is very important (urgent), where administrative sanctions provided by the Government related to corporations that do not carry out the obligation to submit RKAB are...
Pretrial as Supervisory Mechanism for Protecting Suspects' Human Rights Tongat, Tongat; Md Said, Muhamad Helmi; Rozah, Umi
LAW REFORM Vol 22, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : PROGRAM STUDI MAGISTER ILMU HUKUM FAKULTAS HUKUM UNIVERSITAS DIPONEGORO SEMARANG

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/lr.v22i1.68181

Abstract

Although coercive measures in the investigative and prosecutorial processes are essentially legitimate, the line between necessary detention and violations of individual freedoms and human rights is often blurred in practice. Therefore, a control mechanism is essential. This paper aims to analyse two main issues: first, the use of pretrial as a mechanism for monitoring the implementation of suspects' human rights protection during the investigation and prosecution process; and second, the need to consider material aspects in pretrial. Using conceptual, legislative and comparative approaches, this paper reaches at least two conclusions. Firstly, as its focus is limited to the formal procedural process, the pretrial process, as set out in Law Number 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code, has failed to fulfil its function as a control mechanism for ensuring the protection of suspects' human rights during the investigation and prosecution process. Secondly, the absence of provisions for examining material aspects in pretrial further confirms that it is unable to control the use of coercive measures in the investigative and prosecutorial processes
Tension Between Digital Legality Principle and Humanistic Punishment in Indonesian Criminal Code Mulyono, Galih Puji; Nawawi Arief, Barda; Rozah, Umi
Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol. 16 No. 3 (2025): December 2025 (on progress)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Merdeka Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v16i3.16936

Abstract

The Indonesian National Criminal Code (Law No. 1 of 2023) introduces two fundamental changes to Indonesian criminal law: the expansion of the legality principle from a purely formal dimension to a material one by recognizing living law within society (Article 2), and the formulation of humanistic sentencing purposes that place human dignity as the ethical boundary of punishment (Articles 51–52). This article examines the tension between these two pillars in the context of digital crimes including personal data misuse, doxing, deepfake exploitation, and online gender-based violence which inherently evolve faster than legislative responses. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and limited comparative approaches, this study finds that the expansion of the material legality principle does not automatically address cross-border and highly technical digital crimes, while the strict prohibition of analogy risks rendering criminal law unable to keep pace with emerging cyber-criminal modalities. To resolve this tension, this article proposes the concept of "humanistic digital legality principle," which rests on three dimensions: the protection of human dignity as a guiding principle for teleological-protective interpretation, technology-neutral norm drafting that meets the standard of foreseeability, and the integration of the National Criminal Code's value framework with special legislation on digital crimes.
Co-Authors Agustiawan, M. Hendri Asga, Adifyan Rahmat Astuti, A.M. Endah Sri Barda Nawawi Arief, Barda Claudia, Natasya Eko Soponyono Florentina, Brigita Feby Harianja, Frans Capri Yogi Jaya, Nyoman Serikat Putra Jihyun Park Md Said, Muhamad Helmi Mujiono Hafidh Prasetyo Mulyono, Galih Puji Nashriana, Nashriana Nur Rochaeti Pujiyono Pujiyono Rofingi, Rofingi Seraphinus Mariano Agung Serman Simangunsong, Gusfen Alextron Tongat Tongat Yos Johan Utama Yuristha, RM. Egidius