Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

Tugas Kepala Desa Yang Diskriminatif Terhadap Perangkat Desa Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perspektif Fiqihsiyasah: Analisis Pasal 26 Huruf b, Pasal 49 Ayat (2), dan Pasal 53 UU Desa Leni Lawaty; Muhamad Harun; Muhamad Sadi Is; Cholidah Utama
PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3: April 2026
Publisher : CV. Ulil Albab Corp

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/peshum.v5i3.16005

Abstract

Kepala desa memiliki kewenangan strategis dalam penyelenggaraan pemerintahan desa, termasuk kewenangan mengangkat dan memberhentikan perangkat desa sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun2014 tentang Desa yang telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 3Tahun2024. Namun, dalam praktiknya kewenangan tersebut sering dijalankan secara diskriminatif dan tidak objektif. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tugas dan kewenangan kepala desa yang bersifat diskriminatif terhadap perangkat desa berdasarkan Pasal 26 huruf b, Pasal 49 ayat (2), dan Pasal 53 UU Desa, ditinjau dari perspektif hukum tata negara dan fiqih siyasah. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa tindakan diskriminatif kepala desa merupakan bentuk penyalahgunaan kewenangan yang bertentangan dengan prinsip negara hukum berdasarkan demokrasi Pancasila serta nilai keadilan dan amanah dalam fiqih siyasah.
Controlled Constitutionalism and the Decline of Institutional Independence in Indonesian Constitutional Law Hadi Iskandar; Yusrizal Hasbi; Muhamad Sadi Is
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.14580

Abstract

The weakening of institutional independence has become a significant challenge for constitutional democracies, particularly in states experiencing democratic decline without formal constitutional rupture. Existing theories, including abusive constitutionalism, constitutional capture, and executive aggrandizement, primarily explain democratic erosion through constitutional amendments, direct institutional takeovers, or overt expansions of executive authority. These approaches provide limited explanatory power for cases in which constitutional structures remain formally intact while institutional autonomy is gradually constrained through ordinary legal mechanisms. This article addresses that gap by introducing the concept of controlled constitutionalism to explain constitutional developments in Indonesia between 2014 and 2025. Using a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and institutional approaches, the study combines quantitative indicators of the rule of law, institutional integrity, and public trust with qualitative analysis of legislative reforms, judicial decisions, and institutional restructuring involving the Constitutional Court, Supreme Court, Corruption Eradication Commission, Judicial Commission, and other oversight bodies. The findings reveal that institutional independence has eroded through a cumulative process of executive consolidation, legal institutionalization, judicial legitimation, and functional subordination. Rather than dismantling constitutional institutions, these mechanisms reconfigure them into a system of hierarchical governance that preserves formal legality while reducing substantive autonomy. The article argues that controlled constitutionalism constitutes a distinct form of constitutional regression in which law serves as a mechanism of institutional dependence rather than a safeguard against power concentration. This framework offers a new perspective for understanding democratic erosion under conditions of formal constitutional continuity and contributes to broader debates on democratic backsliding in emerging democracies.
Perlindungan Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia dalam memperoleh Hak Atas Tanah di Indonesia Suharyono Suharyono; Khalisah Hayatuddin; Muhamad Sadi Is
Jurnal HAM Vol 13 No 1 (2022): Edisi April
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/ham.2022.13.15-28

Abstract

All living things philosophically need the land, especially humans. Human need land to maintain their lives. Based on it, the protection of human rights in obtaining land rights is essential as well as in defending their land rights. Defending the land means preserving life. The research problem in this paper is how the legal protection of human rights in obtaining land rights in Indonesia? This paper aims to learn about legal protection for human rights in obtaining land rights in Indonesia. Therefore, to maintain and ensure legal protection of human rights in obtaining land rights in Indonesia, it has been regulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and then regulated explicitly in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Regulations about Basic Agrarian Fundamentals. However, it still has weaknesses in the legal protection of human rights in obtaining land rights in Indonesia. So, it can be concluded that the legal protection of human rights in obtaining land rights in Indonesia still has weaknesses. Therefore, the government and the DPR RI are supposed to immediately revise Law Number 5 of 1960 about Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles.