Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.104
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Akta Jurnal Notariil International Journal of Social Service and Research International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) International Journal Of Economics Social And Technology Jurnal Hukum Prioris Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Ensiklopedia Research and Community Service Review Amicus Curiae Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial
Irene Eka Sihombing
Faculty Of Law, Universitas Trisakti
Religion Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mechanical Engineering Social Sciences Other

Published : 29 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 29 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Akibat Hukum Penetapan Tanah Musnah: Ganti Rugi atau Dana Kerohiman? Setiawati, Anda; Probondaru, Ignatius Pradipa; Arsawan, I Gede Yudi; Sihombing, Irene Eka; Nabilah, Hana Jihan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p05

Abstract

The missing of land is one of the causes of the abolition of land rights. With the enactment of Government Regulation Number 18 Year 2021 and Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 17 Year 2021, an issue arises where landowners whose land has been missing demand compensation because a national strategic project will be built on the land. The purpose of this study is to explain the legal aspect of land rights over missing land and to provide an overview of the form of compensation given to landowners whose land has been declared missing, whether in the form of compensation or compassion funds. This study employs a normative juridical research method based on secondary data. According to Presidential Regulation Number 52 Year 2022 as amended by Presidential Regulation Number 27 Year 2023, for lands declared missing and intended for construction in the public interest, only compassion funds are provided, as the priority rights of the landowner to reclaim or reconstruct the land are disregarded. Compensation may be provided if the land declared missing is to be used for public interest projects or national strategic projects and has been reclaimed or reconstructed by the landowner. Musnahnya tanah merupakan salah satu penyebab hapusnya hak atas tanah. Dengan diundangkannya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 dan Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2021 memunculkan persoalan, di mana pemilik tanah yang tanahnya musnah menuntut ganti rugi karena di lokasi tanah akan dibangun proyek strategi nasional. Tujuan dilakukannya kajian ini adalah untuk menjelaskan aspek hukum hak atas tanah dari tanah musnah dan bentuk kompensasi yang diberikan kepada pemilik tanah yang tanahnya terindikasi musnah, apakah dalam bentuk ganti rugi atau berupa dana kerohiman. Dalam kajian ini digunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yang berbasis pada data sekunder. Berdasarkan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 52 Tahun 2022 yang sudah diubah dengan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 27 Tahun 2023 untuk tanah-tanah yang terindikasi musnah dan akan digunakan untuk pembangunan demi kepentingan umum, hanya diberikan dana kerohiman karena hak prioritas dari pemilik tanah berupa hak untuk mereklamasi atau merekonstruksi dikesampingkan. Pemberian ganti rugi dapat diberikan dalam kondisi tanah yang terindikasi musnah sudah direkonstruksi atau direklamasi oleh pemilik tanah dan tanah itu akan digunakan untuk pembangunan proyek-proyek demi kepentingan umum atau proyek strategi nasional.
PARATE EKSEKUSI ATAS TANAH HAK MILIK SEBAGAI JAMINAN UTANG Elvira Diba Fahlevi; Irene Eka Sihombing; Diba Fahlevi, Elvira
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15255

Abstract

A credit arrangement existed between M.Nova Irdiansa, the debtor, and Bank CIMB Niaga, the creditor, in the case that took place on October 20, 2014. In its ruling on the issue, the Supreme Court's panel of judges rejected the plaintiffs' request for a memorandum of cassation, which was included in the judgement. The plaintiffs in this case, M.Nova Irdiansa and Hj.Enny Adriati, are subject to Article 6 of the Mortgage Act (Parate Eksecusi), which provides legal certainty for debt repayment. The issue is whether Bank CIMB Niaga's execution of mortgage rights on freehold land through a public auction complies with the Minister of Finance Regulation Number 27/PMK.06/2016. Research method is normative law, analytical descriptive, the source literature studies, interviews informants and using deductive logic method. The results the research, discussion and conclusion are that the judge rejected the plaintiffs' cassation because Bank CIMB Niaga was proven to have been authorized by law to carry out executions without the consent of the debtor granting Mortgage Rights (Parate Execution), the implementation of which was based on the promise in Article 2 number 6 Deed of Granting Mortgage Rights (APHT) Number 233/2014, namely by way of auction because it had been agreed beforehand.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR PREFERENCE DALAM EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 695 K/PDT/2021): Legal Protection For Preference Creditors In The Execution Of Collective Rights (Study Of Decision Number 695 K/Pdt/2021) Irnanda Lucky Ajisaputri; Irene Eka Sihombing
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19253

Abstract

The protection that is guaranteed when mortgage right comes into effect is protection intended by mortgage rights law. Formulation of problem in this research is (1) What is legal protection for Bank Rakyat Indonesia as the preferred creditor, (2) What is the judge's decision in the case of debtor in default in Decision Number 695 K/Pdt/2021. This research includes normative juridical which is descriptive in nature. Results of research and discussion are that legal protection for BRI as the preferred creditor is regulated by Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 and punishes Halim Peace and Serli to pay principal arrears for credit facility for month of September 2019 amounting to IDR 1,320,590,708.00. Conclusion is that legal protection for creditors is provided through Law Number 4 of 1996 Article 6, Article 20 and Article 21 and in Decision Number 695 K/Pdt/2021, judge rejected plaintiffs' lawsuit against debtor in default, allowing the execution of an auction for disputed object in accordance with Article 6 of Law Number 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights over Land, and ordered payment of principal and interest arrears by debtor to PT. BRI, and ordered cassation applicant to pay court costs amounting to IDR 500,000.00.
SETTLEMENT OF JURIDICAL PROBLEMS OF LAND ASSETS OWNERSHIP PT. INDONESIAN RAILWAY (PERSERO) REGIONAL DIVISION I NORTH SUMATRA Endang Pandamdari; Irene Eka Sihombing; Listyowati Sumanto
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): May
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i3.916

Abstract

Land assets PT. Kereta Api Indonesia (PT. KAI) in several locations is controlled by other parties, giving rise to juridical problems over ownership of land assets by PT. KAI. The purpose of writing is to describe the causes of the problem of ownership of land assets of PT. KAI Regional Division 1 North Sumatra, and describes the settlement of juridical problems of land ownership of PT. KAI Regional Division 1 North Sumatra. The results of the study indicate that the cause of the juridical problems of land ownership of PT. KAI is PT. KAI does not yet have a land certificate as the strongest proof of land ownership, because the land asset ownership rights of PT. KAI is in the form of grondkaart. Settlement of juridical problems of land ownership of PT. KAI is carrying out land registration for all land assets of PT. KAI, so that PT. KAI has a certificate of land rights as the strongest proof of land ownership. Besides that PT. KAI needs to collaborate with the Attorney General's Office, City/Regency Land Offices, and law enforcers to return state assets that are in third parties. In this case PT. KAI needs to safeguard assets including data collection/mapping of assets, installation of boundary markers, installation of asset marking boards, controlling, fencing after controlling, and finally saving assets through legal or litigation channels.
LAND OWNERSHIP BASED ON NATIONAL LAND LAW IN INDONESIA Irene Eka Sihombing
NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan Vol. 3 No. 1 (2018)
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jn.3.1.683.65-74

Abstract

This study examines the certainty of ownership of land rights under the national law on land in Indonesia. It is a type of nomative focusing on reviewing the laws governing land and ownership for Indonesian citizens and foreign nationals living in Indonesia. The approaches used were the conceptual and statute approaches to legislation. The data collected are in the form of articles of law that regulate and related to land and ownership. Qualitative method was a method used in analyzing and presenting data. The results indicate that the statutory provisions are indispensable. The ownership of land rights previously adopted from the Land Law of the West is no longer applicable to date in Indonesia. The study is recommended for those interested in the system and land law investigations to be used as reference material in the theoretical and practical review of the law.
Legal Uncertainty of Pelindo’s Land Management Rights in Port Development: A Normative Analysis of Regulatory Conflict Irene Eka Sihombing; Endang Pandamdari; I Gede Yudi Arsawan; Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru
JURNAL AKTA Vol 13, No 2 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study examines legal issues concerning land control by State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), particularly PT Pelabuhan Indonesia (Persero) (Pelindo), in port development and expansion. In practice, Pelindo frequently acquires land or conducts reclamation using its internal funds; however, the resulting land is often transferred to the Ministry of Transportation (MoT) as the holder of Land Management Rights (Hak Pengelolaan/HPL). This arrangement creates legal uncertainty for Pelindo in managing land assets and establishing business partnerships. The study aims to analyze the legal certainty of Pelindo’s rights over land utilized for port development. Using a normative juridical method, the study examines legislation governing land law, shipping, and state-owned enterprises. The findings indicate that, despite financing land acquisition independently, Pelindo faces uncertainty regarding its legal status over the acquired land. Based on Law Number 5 of 1960, Law Number 2 of 2012, Law Number 17 of 2008, and Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, the party that acquires land and maintains a legal relationship with it should be entitled to the relevant land rights. Therefore, transferring such land to the MoT is not legally required unless acquisition is financed through the State Budget (APBN). The study recommends regulatory harmonization, granting HPL to Pelindo, and strengthening its legal position to ensure greater legal certainty.
DISHARMONI REGULASI HGB DI IKN YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KETIDAKPASTIAN HUKUM DAN KETIDAKADILAN Sahala MPH Siahaan; Irene Eka Sihombing
Ensiklopedia Research and Community Service Review Vol 5, No 2 (2026): Vol. 5 No. 2 Februari 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/err.v5i2.3798

Abstract

Abstract: The development of the Indonesian Capital City (IKN) requires land legal instruments that provide certainty and justice. The Right to Build (HGB) are a crucial instrument in land provision, but their regulation faces disharmony between the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), PP No. 40/1996, PP No. 18/2021, the IKN Law, and and their derivative regulations. This disharmony creates legal uncertainty, particularly for investment and injustice for the community and land management in the IKN. This study aims to analyze the HGB regulations in the Indonesian Land Law system and identify the sources of uncertainty in the regulations regarding HGB in the IKN. Using normative legal research methods with a descriptive analytical nature, this study compares laws and regulations. Data were obtained through literature review and analyzed qualitatively. The results show disharmony in regulations regarding the HGB term, the authority to grant rights, and the position of the IKN Authority. This condition increases the risk of legal uncertainty for investors and has the potential to cause injustice to the community. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is needed to ensure the effective development of the IKN and provide legal certainty and justice for all parties.Keywords: HGB, IKN, Disharmony of Regulation, Legal Certainty, Agrarian Law
Reforming the Regulatory Framework for the Legal Protection of Electronic Mortgagees: Penelitian Eka Sugiarti; Irene Eka Sihombing; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Volume 4 Nomor 1 February - May 2
Publisher : PT PUSTAKA CENDEKIA GROUP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70292/pchukumsosial.v4i1.404

Abstract

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh transformasi digital pelayanan pertanahan melalui sistem Pelayanan Hak Tanggungan Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik (HT-el) yang bertujuan meningkatkan efisiensi dan kepastian hukum, namun dalam praktiknya memunculkan risiko hukum baru yang dapat merugikan kreditur. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis konstruksi regulasi pertanahan, mengevaluasi implementasi serta problematika hukum HT-el di lapangan termasuk korelasinya dengan Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 31K/TUN/2020, serta menemukan model rekonstruksi peraturan yang ideal. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan sifat deskriptif-analitis, didukung oleh pendekatan socio-legal melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelindungan hukum bagi kreditur pemegang HT-el saat ini masih bersifat relatif karena sistem pendaftaran tanah di Indonesia menganut stelsel negatif bertendensi positif, sehingga sertifikat jaminan dapat dibatalkan jika hak atas tanah induknya terbukti cacat hukum. Selain itu, implementasi HT-el dihadapkan pada hambatan teknis berupa server error, validasi data manual yang tidak sesuai SOP, serta ketidaksiapan literasi digital pengguna yang mendegradasi posisi kreditur preferen menjadi konkuren. Kesimpulan penelitian menegaskan perlunya dilakukan rekonstruksi hukum secara komprehensif yang meliputi pembaruan substansi hukum melalui revisi Undang-Undang Hak Tanggungan untuk mempertegas tanggung jawab negara atas kegagalan sistem, penguatan struktur hukum melalui modernisasi infrastruktur siber dan unit pengawasan nasional, serta pembangunan budaya hukum digital bagi seluruh pemangku kepentingan guna mewujudkan sistem jaminan yang adil, aman, dan berkepastian hukum.
Electronic Mortgage and the Vulnerability of Creditor Protection in Indonesia: Lessons from Supreme Court Decision No. 31K/TUN/2020 Eka Sugiarti; Irene Eka Sihombing; Endang Pandamdari
International Journal Of Economics Social And Technology Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): June, 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Riset Ilmiah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59086/ijest.v5i2.2043

Abstract

This study examines the framework of legal protection afforded to creditors holding Electronic Mortgages (Hak Tanggungan Elektronik, HT-el) in Indonesia, with particular attention to its practical implementation, the legal difficulties it has generated including its bearing on Supreme Court Decision No. 31K/TUN/2020 and the design of an appropriate model for legal reform. A normative-juridical method with descriptive-analytical specifications was employed, complemented by a socio-legal approach drawing on library-based research and qualitative field interviews. The findings indicate that, although normative protection for HT-el holders has been established through the interplay of the Mortgage Law, the Electronic Information and Transactions Law, and related ministerial regulations, its practical application remains uneven and vulnerable to disruption. Because Indonesia's land registration system operates on a negative model with positive tendencies, electronic mortgage certificates may still be annulled where the underlying land title is administratively defective or subject to third-party claims. Compounding this vulnerability, technical shortcomings including server failures, erroneous data entry, and delays stemming from non-compliance with standard operating procedures can effectively downgrade a creditor's status from preferred to concurrent. In light of these findings, the study proposes a comprehensive legal reconstruction encompassing three dimensions: reform of legal substance, through amendment of the Mortgage Law to explicitly recognize digital records and clarify state liability; strengthening of legal structure, through enhanced infrastructural resilience and the establishment of dedicated oversight bodies; and cultivation of a digital legal culture among all stakeholders, so as to establish an electronic mortgage system that is both equitable and legally certain.
Co-Authors Annisa Putri Kusumawardani Diba Fahlevi, Elvira Eka Sugiarti Eka Sugiarti Elvira Diba Fahlevi Elvira Diba Fahlevi Endang Pandamdari Endang Pandamdari Fadhila Rizqia Fananny Fadilla Ramdani I Gede Yudi Arsawan Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru Ignatius Pradipa Probondaru Irnanda Lucky Ajisaputri John Kenedy Azis Listyowati Sumanto Made Bhisma Abidharma Merada Medianti, Innayah Rahmatunisa Nabilah, Hana Jihan Raden Devina Maulina Sahala MPH Siahaan Sarah Jasmine Syafitri Sari, Fary Fitriana Gita Saskia Aulia Putri Setiawati, Anda Virgia Intansari