Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Notarius JURNAL MERCATORIA Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum NOMOI Law Review Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review
T. Keizerina Devi Azwar
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Karya Fotografi Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Hak Cipta (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor: 10/HKI/Hak Cipta/2014/PN. Niaga Sby) Satria Perdana; O.K Saidin; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Jelly Leviza
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 3 (2021): Oktober 2021 - Januari 2022
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i3.176

Abstract

Portraiture is one of the art of photography by displaying human objects either individually or in groups, which emphasizes the personality elements of the photo object. According to Article 1 Number 10 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, it is explained that a portrait is a photographic work with a human object. The formulation of the problem in this thesis is how actions can be categorized as commercialization of photographic works without permission, what are the legal provisions regarding the settlement of copyright disputes in the case of commercialization of photographic works without permission, how are the judges' legal considerations in the decision Number 10/HKI/Hakcopy/2014 /PN.Sby in terms of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Acts that can be categorized as commercialization of photographic works without permission are commercial use, reproduction, announcements, distribution or communication of the portraits made for the purposes of commercial advertisements or advertising without the written consent of the person being photographed or his heirs. Legal provisions regarding the settlement of copyright disputes in the event of commercialization of photographic works without permission can be reached through litigation dispute resolution, namely settlement through a court institution. In addition, non-litigation dispute resolution efforts can also be taken, namely dispute resolution outside the court, such as through alternative dispute resolution or arbitration. The judge's legal considerations in the decision Number 10/HKI/Copyright/2014/PN.Sby are appropriate in terms of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright, namely the defendant without the Plaintiff's approval has used the image/photo published in the Java Post print daily so that it is true that the Defendant violated the plaintiff's copyright as referred to in the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (1) of Law Number 28 of 2004 concerning Copyright. Therefore, the legal consequences arising from the use of portraits without permission are compensation for those who feel aggrieved. This is stated in Article 96 paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3) which is strengthened by Article 99 (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (3) letters c and d, as well as Article 115
Problematika Pendaftaran Tanah Bagi Ahli Waris Keturunan Tionghoa Yang Perkawinan Orang Tuanya Tidak Tercatat Rismawaty Rismawaty; Dedi Harianto; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Faisal Akbar
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 3 (2021): Oktober 2021 - Januari 2022
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i3.171

Abstract

Registration of property rights is part of land registration. Article 19 paragraph (1) of the LoGA stipulates that "To guarantee legal certainty by the government, land registration is held throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia according to the provisions stipulated by Government Regulation." The implementation of land registration activities is an obligation of the government which aims to guarantee legal certainty that is rechtscadaster, meaning that it is for the benefit of land registration only and is only concerned with what rights and who owns it, not for other interests such as taxation. The formulation of the problem in this study is 1) How is the determination of heirs to the transfer of land rights of Chinese descent based on Inheritance according to the Provisions for Land Registration in Indonesia?, 2) What are the obstacles to registering the transfer of land rights obtained by heirs of Chinese descent based on inheritance if the marriage of their parents not registered at the civil registry office? 3) What are the efforts to solve the problem to overcome the problem of registering the transfer of land rights obtained by heirs of Chinese descent based on inheritance if the marriage of their parents is not registered at the civil registry office? The type used in this research is normative juridical. Sources of data used in this study is secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials
Analisis Akta Wasiat Atas Harta Bersama Yang Dilaksanakan Setelah Suami Meninggal Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan Agama No: 2304/Pdt.G/2017/PA Medan Putra Rizki Akbar; Sunarmi Sunarmi; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Edy Ikhsan
Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Vol 2, No 2 (2021): Juni - September
Publisher : Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55357/is.v2i2.147

Abstract

A letter of will has to be contained in the deed, in line with the provision stipulated in article 921 of the Civil Code which states that one shall list all the assets that were present at the time of the death of the donor or testator. When heir’s rights are violated, he is allowed to take legal efforts by claiming for his absolute or legal portion through a civil lawsuit to Religious Court, an example of which is the case in the Religious Court Ruling No.2304/Pdt.G/2017/PA Medan. The inherited assets disputed in this ruling belong to Drs. H. AUL and Hj. AHN. When they were still alive, Hj. AHN had drawn up two deeds regulating the provision and sharing of her assets. Due to these deeds, the siblings and nephews of H.AUL, the legitimate husband of Hj. AHN, did not receive any assets. The plaintiffs consider that Defendant I and Defendant II act as if they have full rights over the assets of AUL and AHN, in fact the plaintiff thinks that he is also rightful over the assets of AUL. Reconciliation between both parties has ever been attempted but it failed; thus, the plaintiffs finally file a civil lawsuit to the court. In their lawsuit, they state that they disagree to the action taken by AHN and want to claim for revocation of the deeds in order that they can receive some of the assets inherited by AUL and AHN. This is an analytical descriptive research that describes and analyzes data systematically to provide as conscientious da as possible about humans. The data collection technique employed in this research is combination of documentary study and field research. This research collected secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The status of joint property is entitled due to death parting husband and wife as regulated in article 96 paragraph (1) of Islamic Law Compilation which states that half of joint property becomes the right of the other spouse (husband or wife) who lives longer. In this case, the wife has the right to make a will which object belongs to joint property after death of her husband, as long as there is not any violation to the requirements for validation and limitations made by the testator during the drawing up of the deeds. If the limitations are violated, according to Article 201 of Islamic Law Compilation, the will takes only 1/3 of the inheritance. The will drawn up by Defendant II as a Notary has surpassed maximum limit of 1/3 without the consent from Plaintiff I until IX and Defendant III until Defendant VIII as heirs, also, the will was drawn up when AHN was in the state of serious illness which was 1 month after her death. Therefore, the deeds can be revoked because they violated some prevailing regulations
Keabsahan Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Yang Tidak Sesuai Anggaran Dasar Erlinda Vivi Yusanti; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Mahmul Siregar
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 1 Issue 3 - July 2022
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v1i3.63

Abstract

Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) merupakan organ perseroan yang memegang kekuasaan tertinggi dalam perseroan dan memegang segala wewenang yang tidak diserahkan oleh direksi dan komisaris. Dalam pelaksanaan RUPS prinsip majority rule minority protection sering terabaikan, dimana setiap tindakan perseroan tidak boleh merugikan pemegang saham lainnya. Salah satu kasus mengenai hal tersebut terdapat dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 431 K/Pdt/2018 , dimana RUPS tetap dijalankan tanpa kehadiran pemilik saham minoritas. Karena itu penelitian ini ditujukan untuk menganalisis dan menjelaskan suatu pelaksanaan RUPS dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai perbuatan hukum yang sah, perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang saham minoritas dalam pelaksanaan RUPS pada perseroan terbatas, serta melihat penerapan hukum terkait dengan penyelenggaran RUPS dan perlindungan pemegang saham minoritas dalam RUPS berdasarkan putusan MA No. 431 K/PDT/2018. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Keabsahan RUPS tergantung kepada Anggaran Dasarnya sepanjang tidak bertentangan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas dan/atau tergantung kepada Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Perseroan Terbatas sepanjang tidak diatur dalam Anggaran Dasar.
JURIDICAL ANALYSIS OF SHARE OWNERSHIP OF UNDERAGE CHILD IN THE BANKRUPTCY OF THEIR PARENTS AS A GUARDIAN IN PT. ARGA DUMILAH Rina Alamanda Nasution; Sunarmi Sunarmi; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Detania Sukarja
NOMOI Law Review Vol 3, No 2 (2022): November Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v3i2.12248

Abstract

Juridically, Parents represent Minors to carry out all legal actions both inside and outside the court. One of them is that parents are obliged and responsible for the management of their children's assets, both for the ownership of these assets and for all the results of the goods that they are allowed to enjoy . Parents are not allowed to transfer their rights or pledge their children's property except for the interests of the child. Ownership of shares in the name of Minors is a form of investment as capital in a limited liability company and ownership rights to shares are obtained by inheritance. This research uses a normative juridical legal research method with a descriptive qualitative research model, and prioritizes the main data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This study refers to legal theories, legal norms, legal principles and legal theories contained in legislation and court decisions.
Legal Liability for Uploading Movie Spoilers on Social Media Instagram and Youtube Based on Indonesian Law Faradila Harahap; OK. Saidin; Jelly Leviza; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 1- January 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i1.111

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is to know and analyze the violation of uploading spoilers for other people's copyrighted works according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright; forms of copyright infringement for uploading movie spoilers on social media Instagram and YouTube; and legal liability for uploading movie spoilers on social media. This type of research is normative research and descriptive in nature. The data source comes from secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through document study data collection techniques. The results of the study concluded that the act of mutilation of creation in movie spoilers is an infringement of copyright because it eliminates part of the creation or work of the creator of a movie. Forms of copyright infringement on the act of uploading movie spoilers are mostly done without the permission of the copyright holder and are rampant on social media services such as Instagram, and YouTube. Legal liability for uploading movie spoilers on social media can be held civilly liable under Article 1365 of the Civil Code and criminal liability as in Law No. 28 of 2014 on copyright.
Kedudukan Tanah Masyarakat Diareal Perkebunan PT. Parasawita yang Beralih Ke PT. Rapala Melda Notaria; Muhammad Yamin; Rosnidar Sembiring; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 1- January 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i1.112

Abstract

Sengketa merupakan perbedaan nilai, kepentingan, pendapat, dan atau persepsi antara orang per orang atau badan hukum (privat atau publik). Sengketa dapat terjadi antar individu, antar individu dengan kelompok, dan antar kelompok dengan kelompok. Sengketa terjadi antara warga dengan PT Rapala, masyarakat mengklaim 144 hektar dari 1.069 hektar HGU milik PT rapala berada di tanah dan lahan HGU juga berada dalam wilayah administrasi desa. Jenis penelitian adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Sifat penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis dimana penelitian ini berupaya untuk memberikan argumentasi dari hasil penelitian yang telah dilakukan. Hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa status kepemilikan tanah akibat saling klaim antara masyarakat dan PT. Rapala. Konflik pertanahan antara PT Rapala dengan masyarakat Kampung Perkebunan Sungai Iyu. Pelepasan hak garapan yang diperoleh PT Rapala dari masyarakat dinyatakan sah karena telah memenuhi persyaratan administrasi. Rapala. Penyelesaian sengketa lahan yang sudah dilakukan oleh masyarakat dan pihak perusahaan PT Rapala, upaya penyelesaian yang dilakukan mulai dari melibatkan pihak BPN yang dimana pihak BPN sudah turun langsung dilokasi sengketa lahan, melalui PEMDA Aceh Tamiang dan DPRD Aceh Tamiang. Upaya Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tanah antara masyarakat dan PT. Rapala. Untuk menyelesaikan konflik yang terjadi dimasyarakat dengan PT Rapala pemerintah Kabupaten Tamiang dengan menggunakan cara mediasi yaitu dengan membentuk tim terpadu/ mediator yang dibuat sesuai dengan peraturan Bupati Aceh Tamiang.
Penerapan Wasiat Wajibah dalam Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Agama (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Medan dan Pengadilan Agama Binjai) Yefrizawati Yefrizawati; Idha Aprilyana Sembiring; Utary Maharany Barus; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar
JURNAL MERCATORIA Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL MERCATORIA DESEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/mercatoria.v15i2.6550

Abstract

Artikel untuk mengkaji pertimbangan bagi ahli waris non muslim oleh Mahkamah Agung RI dalam menetapkan putusan wasiat wajibah dan persepsi hakim pengadilan agama Kota Medan dan Binjai berkaitan dengan ahli waris non muslim mendapatkan wasiat wajibah. Masalah difokuskan pada Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI menetapkan ahli waris non muslim menerima wasiat wajibah dan pandangan hakim Pengadilan Agama Kota Medan dan Binjai tentang putusan tersebut. Guna menyelesaikan masalah ini, digunakan acuan teori maqasid syariah, hukum progresif dan pembangunan hukum. Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, dengan memadukan sumber data primer dan sekunder. Data dikumpulkan melalui studi dokumen dan hasil wawancara kepada informan kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Hakim di lingkup Mahkamah Agung mendasarkan 3 (tiga) pertimbangan hukum dalam memberikan wasiat wajibah bagi ahli waris non muslim yaitu kemaslahatan, pluralisme agama dalam rumah tangga dan keadilan. Selain itu, belum pernah diterima dan diputuskan perkara mengenai pemberian wasiat wajibah bagi ahli waris non muslim. Dan berdasarkan pandangan para hakim di lingkungan pengadilan agama pada umumnya tidak menyetujui tindakan pemberian wasiat wajibah bagi ahli waris non muslim disebabkan hal tersebut bertentangan dengan ketentuan syariah islam dan juga ketentuan hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia yang dalam hal ini tercantum dalam Kompilasi Hukum Islam.
Risiko Hukum Penggunaan Smart Contract pada Ethereum di Indonesia M. Ulul Azmi; Sunarmi Sunarmi; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar; Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 3 - March 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i3.140

Abstract

Aktivitas ekonomi secara global telah beradaptasi dan melakukan digitalisasi, ekonomi digital membuat aktivitas bisnis masyarakat berubah, dari yang awalnya bersifat manual kini perlahan bertransformasi menjadi serba digital, sehingga berbagai aktivitas menjadi lebih praktis dan efesien. Dibalik kelebihan yang ditawarkan namun ada hal penting lainnya yang perlu diperhatikan yaitu mengenai risiko-risiko yang akan ditimbulkan terkait aktivitas tersebut mengingat belum adanya regulasi yang mengatur secara khusus di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana risiko hukum yang ditimbulkan terhadap penggunaan smart contract pada ethereum di Indonesia. Hasil yang diperoleh adalah risiko hukum penggunaan smart contract pada ethereum di Indonesia dapat ditimbulkan dari berbagai sisi mulai dari risiko hukum regulasi, risiko hukum kontrak, dan risiko kepatuhan.
Pelanggaran Prinsip Fiduciary Duty oleh Direksi yang Rangkap Jabatan Prawira Kamila; Budiman Ginting; Dedi Harianto; T. Keizerina Devi Azwar
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Volume 2 Issue 3 - March 2023
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v2i3.142

Abstract

Fenomena rangkap jabatan direksi pada perseroan terbatas saat ini marak di Indonesia. Hal ini menimbulkan vested interest yang menjadi salah satu indikator pelanggaran prinsip fiduciary duty. Penelitian ini juga bertujuan untuk mengetahui korelasi antara fiduciary duty dan rangkap jabatan. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian disimpulkan bahwa kurangnya pengaturan mengenai rangkap jabatan menyebabkan tidak adanya batasan yang jelas mengenai mana yang dilarang dan mana yang diperbolehkan, karena hal ini dapat menyebabkan pelanggaran terhadap Prinsip Fiduciary Duty yang pada akhirnya akan merugikan kepentingan perseroan terbatas dan para pemegang saham. Fiduciary Duty ada antara direksi dan perseroan terbatas. Direksi menjalankan tugasnya dengan itikad baik, penuh tanggung jawab, dan untuk kepentingan perseroan. Mereka tidak boleh menyebabkan kerugian keuangan perusahaan. Jika hal tersebut terjadi, maka akan ada konsekuensi hukum seperti tuntutan dari pemegang saham untuk mendapatkan sanksi yang diatur dalam pasal 1365 KUH Perdata dan pasal 398 dan 399 KUHP. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum terhadap rangkap jabatan yang seolah-olah diperbolehkan namun dapat merugikan perusahaan. UUPT tahun 2007 telah mengatur bentuk pertanggungjawaban direksi dan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham. Disarankan agar Fiduciary Duty dan rangkap jabatan diatur untuk mencegah kerugian keuangan perusahaan dan melindungi perusahaan dan pemegang sahamnya.
Co-Authors Ardo Sirait BUDIMAN GINTING Carl Augustinus Hothinca Soutihon Tampub Dedi Harianto Edy Ikhsan Erlinda Vivi Yusanti Faisal Akbar Faradila Harahap Fathiya Al'Uzma Idha Aprilyana Sembiring Jelly Leviza M. Ulul Azmi MAHMUL SIREGAR Melda Notaria Muhammad Yamin Lubis, Muhammad Yamin O.K Saidin OK. Saidin Prawira Kamila Putra Rizki Akbar Rahmi Pambpha Patresia M Rina Alamanda Nasution Rismawaty Rismawaty Rosnidar Sembiring Rudy Haposan Siahaan Satria Perdana Sukarja, Detania Sunarmi, Sunarmi Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Syarifah Lisa Andriati Utary Maharany Barus Yefrizawati