Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : international journal software engineering and computer science ijsecs

Comparative Analysis of LSTM and CNN–LSTM Models for Daily Air Temperature Prediction in Tanjung Priok Port Using Multivariate Meteorological Data Erian Tasa; Tukiyat Tukiyat; Yan Mitha Djaksana
International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): AUGUST 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Komunitas Informasi Teknologi Aceh (KITA), Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i2.7564

Abstract

Air temperature prediction is important for supporting weather monitoring and operational activities in port areas. Accurate temperature forecasting can support decision-making related to maritime transportation, logistics, and weather-based risk mitigation. This study compares the performance of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Convolutional Neural Network–Long Short-Term Memory (CNN–LSTM) models for daily air temperature prediction in the Tanjung Priok Port area. The dataset consists of daily meteorological observations collected from the Tanjung Priok Maritime Meteorological Station, Indonesia, covering the period from 2000 to 2025. Eight input variables were used, including rainfall, sunshine duration, air pressure, average humidity, average wind speed, and three lagged temperature variables. Data preprocessing included data cleaning, 7-day moving average smoothing, MinMaxScaler normalization, and sequence generation using a sliding-window approach. The dataset was divided into training (70%), validation (15%), and testing (15%) sets. Model performance was evaluated using Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE), and the coefficient of determination (R²). The results show that the LSTM model achieved the best overall performance, with an MAE of 0.1457 °C, RMSE of 0.1811 °C, MAPE of 0.5030%, and R² of 0.9423. In comparison, the CNN–LSTM model obtained an MAE of 0.2566 °C, RMSE of 0.3316 °C, MAPE of 0.8802%, and R² of 0.8065. These results indicate that the standalone LSTM model performed better than the CNN–LSTM model in predicting daily air temperature for the Tanjung Priok Port dataset.
Analysis of Early Detection of Automatic Weather Station Sensor Failures: A Comparative Study of Supervised Deep Neural Networks and Unsupervised Autoencoders Hasbullah Zuhri Hasibuan; Sudarno Wiharjo; Yan Mitha Djaksana
International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): AUGUST 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Komunitas Informasi Teknologi Aceh (KITA), Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35870/ijsecs.v6i2.7593

Abstract

Automatic Weather Stations (AWS) continuously collect and record meteorological data in real time and support weather information services. The reliability of AWS observations depends on sensor performance, as sensor failures, equipment degradation, and communication disturbances may produce anomalous data and reduce data quality. This study aims to develop an early-detection approach for AWS sensor anomalies using a Deep Neural Network (DNN) and an Autoencoder, compare their performance, and identify the sensors most frequently associated with anomalies. The dataset consists of 385,237 observations collected from the AWS Ancol station in North Jakarta from January to September 2025, covering nine meteorological and oceanographic parameters. The study involved data preprocessing, Min-Max normalization, model training, and evaluation using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, confusion matrix, and ROC-AUC. The DNN achieved 99.6% accuracy, 0.922 precision, 0.996 recall, 0.958 F1-score, and 1.000 AUC. The Autoencoder achieved 95.8% accuracy, 0.578 precision, 0.023 recall, 0.043 F1-score, and 0.584 AUC. The AUC of 1.000 obtained by the DNN should be interpreted within the characteristics of the labeled dataset used in this study and should not be considered evidence of perfect generalization. Sensor analysis identified wind direction as the parameter most frequently associated with anomalies, contributing 46.67% of the detected anomalies in the DNN and 66.02% in the Autoencoder. These findings indicate that the supervised DNN performed better than the Autoencoder for anomaly detection on the labeled AWS dataset used in this study.