Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.091
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL HUKUM Dinamika Hukum Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha Proceeding Fakultas Ekonomi Abdimas Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Proceeding SENDI_U YUSTISI WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Transparansi Hukum Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Intimas (Jurnal INTIMAS): Inovasi Teknologi Informasi Dan Komputer Untuk Masyarakat al-Mawarid Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum (JSYH)
Adi Suliantoro
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 32 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris

 1 
ANALISA YURIDIS PERKAWINAN BEDA AGAMA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM POSITIF DI KOTA SURABAYA Indri Dwi Cahyani; Adi Suliantoro
The Juris Vol. 7 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v7i1.830

Abstract

Interreligious marriage has remained a controversial topic in society since the time of Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974. The agreements and rules governing interfaith marriages are primarily aimed at whether different marriages are valid. Look only at Law No. 6 of 2006 on Population Control. Couples married to different religions can apply to the district court, but this is limited to registration of marriage only, but what regulates whether it is legal? No regulations yet. The Indonesian Islamic scholar, particularly in his KHI Compilation of Islamic Law, states that interreligious marriages are void, which is supported by his 2005 MUI Fatwa on Interreligious Marriage. In this study, the authors use a prescriptive legal approach. It is a method of studying forensic research conducted on literature or secondary data and using deductive reasoning and coherent truth criteria. Deductive thinking should be understood as a way of thinking that draws conclusions from proven-true generalities and is directed to specifics. Interreligious marriage cannot be justified on the basis of Marriage Law and Summarizing Islamic Law, as the purpose of these rules is to prevent greater harm/loss in addition to the resulting benefit/benefit.
Co-Authors ., Rochmani Aditya Rifaldi Agus Prasetyo Utomo Analia, Rindu Bening Arikha Saputra Dyah Listyarini Dyah Listyarini, Dyah Dyah Listyorini Ebuzer Ersoy, Muhammet Euis Soliha Faozi, Safik Farhandito, Tangguh Fitika Andraini Halu, Siti Zubaeda Hardiansyah, Rully Buyung Hawa, Nur Imamah Indri Dwi Cahyani Juwanda, Farikhin Listiyorini, Dyah Listyorini, Dyah martha, ayunda Muarifah, Muarifah Novita Mariana Pambudi, Satrio Rilo Risat Wardana Rochmani ., Rochmani Rochmani Rochmani Safik Faozi, Safik Satriyo Budi Santoso Suciyaningsih Wenny Megawati