Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.998
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Lentera Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Al-Daulah : Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Justitia et Pax Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal HAM Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Media Syari'ah: Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Sosiologi Agama Indonesia (JSAI) Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) As-Siyadah: Jurnal Politik dan Hukum Tata Negara Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Zahlul Pasha
Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PROBLEMATIKA INDEPENDENSI KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH Pasha, Zahlul
Justitia et Pax Vol 33, No 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v33i1.1373

Abstract

ABSTRACTAfter signing the MoU between the Indonesian government and the Free Aceh Movement, a lot of interesting dynamics going on in Aceh, which is the Qanun KKR Aceh. As an independent agency, the Aceh TRC duty to disclose the truth on the alleged past human rights violations in Aceh. This paper examines the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is based on theoretical characteristics of an independent institution. Based on the results of the study found that the Aceh TRC has a number of independent properties include: an odd number of members, the independent election commission members, the election and dismissal of members of the commission are closely regulated and has the authority to regulate themselves (self-regulated bodies). However, on the other hand also found two other things that escape is set regarding the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is concerning institutional decision-making procedures and functions of the commission as well as regarding filling positions that are not members of the commission be gradual (staggered terms) but simultaneously. Keywords: Independency, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh. INTISARIPasca penandatanganan MoU Helsinki antara Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GerakanAceh Merdeka, banyak dinamika menarik yang terjadi di Aceh, salah satunyaadalah pengesahan Qanun KKR Aceh. Sebagai lembaga independen, KKR Aceh bertugas mengungkap kebenaran atas dugaan pelanggaran HAM berat masa lalu di Aceh. Tulisan ini berusaha mengkaji sifat independensi KKR Aceh berdasarkan ciri teroritik suatu lembaga independen. Berdasarkan hasil kajian ditemukan bahwa KKR Aceh memiliki sejumlah sifat independenmeliputi: jumlah anggota yang ganjil, proses pemilihan anggota komisi yang independen, pemilihan dan pemberhentian anggota komisi diatur jelas serta memiliki kewenangan untuk mengatur dirinya sendiri (self regulated bodies). Namun, di sisi lain juga ditemukan dua hal lain yang luput diatur berkenaan sifat independensi KKR Aceh, yaitu menyangkut prosedur pengambilan keputusan kelembagaan dan fungsi komisi serta perihal pengisian jabatan anggota komisi yang tidak dilakukan secara bertahap(staggered terms) melainkan bersamaan. Kata Kunci: Independensi, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh.
MENILAI KESESUAIAN QANUN KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH DENGAN ASAS-ASAS PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Pasha, Zahlul
Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2019): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam (Jurisprud
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v11i2.1042

Abstract

This research aim to analyze of parity between the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconcialiation Commission and the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Law-making Process.The conclusion of this research is establishment of the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission seems has trouble with the Law-making Process Principles, specifically on clarity of formulation, hierarchical types and material substances. Furthermore, this situation was leading motive prompting people who are harmed to initiate judicial review
Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khsusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi Akbar, Khairil; Pasha Karim, Zahlul; Fadlullah, Nyak; Siddiq Armia, Muhammad
Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v7i1.719

Abstract

DOKA is the biggest source of corruption that has driven distric heads in Aceh to prison. This fact raises the question, how has the DOKA monitoring system been carried out and what is the impact on corruption eradication? This study aims to explain the DOKA monitoring system and its impact on corruption eradication. The theory used is the theory of Check and Balances and the theory of Willingness & Oppurtunity. This research is classified into qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques. The main findings of the study indicate that DOKA is not being taken seriously. This can be seen in the absence of a special supervision system and the normal supervision system for DOKA is not optimal. In addition, there is no special institution that oversees the implementation of DOKA. Such a supervisory system has no impact on corruption eradication. It needs serious improvement and a comprehensive evaluation of the use and distribution of DOKA for the realization of social welfare in Aceh.
Kontestasi Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Menyelesaikan Polemik Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Aceh Karim, Zahlul Pasha; Akbar, Khairil; Makinara, Ihdi Karim
De Jure: Jurnal Hukum dan Syari'ah Vol 13, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18860/j-fsh.v13i2.13876

Abstract

Abstract: This article tries to trace the steps of the House of Representatives which revoked two articles in Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Governance, namely Article 57 and Article 60 paragraph (1), (2) and (4), which relate to the Aceh election institution through Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. Later, the Constitutional Court's action was annulled by the Constitutional Court because it violated the formal procedure for amending the Aceh Governance Law. The research method was carried out normatively with two problem formulations, why did the House of Representative revoke two articles of the Aceh Governance Law related to election management institutions in Aceh without complying with and even violating the procedures regulated by the Aceh Governance Law as a special law? Why did the Constitutional Court annulled the revocation of the two articles and consider them unconstitutional? The result showed that the revocation of the two articles was carried out by the House of Representative for several reasons, namely removing the dualism of the election supervisory agency in Aceh and tidying up the structure of the election management body in Indonesia to comply with the provisions of Article 22E paragraph (5) of the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In 1945 and strengthening election administration institutions in the face of simultaneous elections in 2019. Meanwhile, the steps were taken by the Constitutional Court to cancel the revocation of the two articles and judge them as unconstitutional because the House of Representative did not conduct consultations and asked the Aceh People's Representative Council for consideration in the revocation process.Keywords: Aceh Election Commission; Election Supervisory Committee; Aceh Governance Law; Election Law.Abstrak: Artikel ini bertujuan menelusuri langkah DPR yang mencabut dua pasal dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh (UUPA), yakni Pasal 57 dan Pasal 60 ayat (1), (2) dan (4), yang berhubungan dengan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Belakangan, pencabutan itu dibatalkan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi karena dinilai inkonstitusional. Metode penelitian dilakukan secara normatif dengan dua rumusan masalah, mengapa DPR mencabut dua pasal UUPA terkait lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Aceh tanpa mematuhi tata cara yang telah diatur oleh UUPA sebagai undang-undang khusus? Mengapa Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional? Adapun metode penelitian adalah hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, teori, dan historis. Hasilnya diperoleh bahwa pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dilakukan DPR karena beberapa alasan, yakni menghapus dualisme lembaga pengawas pemilu di Aceh dan menertibkan struktur lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di Indonesia agar sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 22E ayat (5) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sementara langkah Mahkamah Konstitusi membatalkan pencabutan kedua pasal tersebut dan menilainya sebagai tindakan inkonstitusional dikarenakan DPR tidak melakukan konsultasi dan meminta pertimbangan DPRA dalam proses pencabutan.Kata Kunci: Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat; Mahkamah Konstitusi; Lembaga Pemilu Aceh; Undang-undang Pemilu.
Sengkarut Pola Hubungan Lembaga Penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus Mutiara Fahmi; Zahlul Pasha; Khairil Akbar
Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam Vol. 10 No. 1 (2020): April
Publisher : Prodi Siyasah (Hukum Tata Negara) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/ad.2020.10.1.1-31

Abstract

This article seeks to analize the pattern of relations and authority of election agencies in special autonomous regions in Indonesia. The difference in the pattern of relations between election agencies in the special sutonomy region coincided with the implementation of asymmetric decentralization policies in Indonesia. As a result, differences in authority and specificity that is owned by one region with other regions. Whereas the Indonesian constitution based on Article 22E paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia states that all regulations relating to the electoral institutions in Indonesia apply nationally. The research method used is normative and empirical. This study found similarities and differences in the pattern of relationships and authority of election agencies in the special sutonomy Region. The similarity is that the election agencies in this Special Autonomous Region has lost certain duties and authorities that affect the pattern of their relationship. The difference lies in the lost duties and authority. In DKI Jakarta, the duties and responsibilities of the election organizers in the Regency/City are only in the context of assisting the Election organizing tasks in the Province. The duties and authority of the election organizers in DIY are reduced in the case of the Governor General Election. While in Aceh, the task of supervision is divided between two organizing agencies, namely the Aceh Panwaslih and the Aceh Province Panwaslih. In the future, this pattern of relations and authority will become a source of conflict and dispute. While in Papua Province, the election organize did not hold general elections due to the implementation of the noken system in some of these areas. Artikel ini berupaya menganalisis pola hubungan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di daerah otonomi khusus di Indonesia. Perbedaan pola hubungan lembaga penyelenggara pemilu di daerah otsus muncul bersamaan dengan implementasi kebijakan desentralisasi asimetris di Indonesia. Akibatnya, muncul perbedaan kewenangan dan kekhususan yang dimiliki oleh satu daerah dengan daerah lain. Padahal konstitusi Indonesia berdasarkan Pasal 22E ayat (5) UUD NRI 1945 menyebutkan bahwa segala peraturan yang terkait dengan lembaga pemilihan umum di Indonesia berlaku secara nasional. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah normatif dan empiris. Penelitian ini menemukan adanya kesamaan dan perbedaan pola hubungan dan kewenangan lembaga penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus. Kesamaannya adalah, lembaga penyelenggara Pemilu di Daerah Otonomi Khusus ini sama-sama kehilangan tugas dan kewenangan tertentu yang memengaruhi pola hubungan mereka. Perbedaannya terletak pada tugas dan kewenangan yang hilang. Di DKI Jakarta, tugas dan kewengan penyelenggara Pemilu di Kabupaten/Kota hanya dalam rangka membantu tugas penyelenggara Pemilu di Provinsi. Tugas dan kewenangan penyelenggara Pemilu di DIY diciutkan dalam hal Pemilukada Gubernur. Sedang di Aceh, tugas pengawasan dibagi kepada dua lembaga penyelenggara, yakni Panwaslih Aceh dan Panwaslih Provinsi Aceh. Ke depan, pola hubungan dan kewenangan ini menjadi sumber konflik dan sengketa. Sementara di Provinsi Papua, lembaga penyelenggara pemilu tidak melaksanakan pemilihan umum akibat penerapan sistem noken di beberapa daerah tersebut.
PROBLEMATIKA INDEPENDENSI KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH Zahlul Pasha
Justitia et Pax Vol. 33 No. 1 (2017): Justitia Et Pax Volume 33 Nomor 1 Tahun 2017
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v33i1.1373

Abstract

ABSTRACTAfter signing the MoU between the Indonesian government and the Free Aceh Movement, a lot of interesting dynamics going on in Aceh, which is the Qanun KKR Aceh. As an independent agency, the Aceh TRC duty to disclose the truth on the alleged past human rights violations in Aceh. This paper examines the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is based on theoretical characteristics of an independent institution. Based on the results of the study found that the Aceh TRC has a number of independent properties include: an odd number of members, the independent election commission members, the election and dismissal of members of the commission are closely regulated and has the authority to regulate themselves (self-regulated bodies). However, on the other hand also found two other things that escape is set regarding the nature of the independence of Aceh TRC is concerning institutional decision-making procedures and functions of the commission as well as regarding filling positions that are not members of the commission be gradual (staggered terms) but simultaneously. Keywords: Independency, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh. INTISARIPasca penandatanganan MoU Helsinki antara Pemerintah Indonesia dengan GerakanAceh Merdeka, banyak dinamika menarik yang terjadi di Aceh, salah satunyaadalah pengesahan Qanun KKR Aceh. Sebagai lembaga independen, KKR Aceh bertugas mengungkap kebenaran atas dugaan pelanggaran HAM berat masa lalu di Aceh. Tulisan ini berusaha mengkaji sifat independensi KKR Aceh berdasarkan ciri teroritik suatu lembaga independen. Berdasarkan hasil kajian ditemukan bahwa KKR Aceh memiliki sejumlah sifat independenmeliputi: jumlah anggota yang ganjil, proses pemilihan anggota komisi yang independen, pemilihan dan pemberhentian anggota komisi diatur jelas serta memiliki kewenangan untuk mengatur dirinya sendiri (self regulated bodies). Namun, di sisi lain juga ditemukan dua hal lain yang luput diatur berkenaan sifat independensi KKR Aceh, yaitu menyangkut prosedur pengambilan keputusan kelembagaan dan fungsi komisi serta perihal pengisian jabatan anggota komisi yang tidak dilakukan secara bertahap(staggered terms) melainkan bersamaan. Kata Kunci: Independensi, Komisi Kebenaran dan Rekonsiliasi Aceh.
MENILAI KESESUAIAN QANUN KOMISI KEBENARAN DAN REKONSILIASI ACEH DENGAN ASAS-ASAS PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Zahlul Pasha
Jurisprudensi : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundangan-Undangan dan Ekonomi Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2019): Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam (Jurisprud
Publisher : State of Islamic Institute Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/jurisprudensi.v11i2.1042

Abstract

This research aim to analyze of parity between the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconcialiation Commission and the Law Number 12 Year 2011 on the Law-making Process.The conclusion of this research is establishment of the Qanun of Aceh Truth and Reconciliation Commission seems has trouble with the Law-making Process Principles, specifically on clarity of formulation, hierarchical types and material substances. Furthermore, this situation was leading motive prompting people who are harmed to initiate judicial review
Partai Politik Lokal di Daerah Otonomi Khusus: Perbandingan Yuridis Aceh dan Papua Musrafiyan Musrafiyan; Mutiara Fahmi; Zahlul Pasha Karim
Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 6, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Law Department, Sharia and Law Faculty.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/justisia.v6i2.11536

Abstract

The existence of local political parties is one of the special powers for Aceh and Papua Provinces. Unlike Aceh, the rules regarding local political parties in Papua are not clearly stated in Law no. 21 of 2001 concerning Special Autonomy for Papua Province. This paper attempts to analyze the comparison between Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning the Government of Aceh and Law Number 21 of 2001 on Special Autonomy for the Province of Papua regarding local political parties, and the consequences for Aceh and Papua of differences in local political party arrangements. The method that the author uses is library research with a law approach and a sociological approach. The results of the research show that the Aceh special autonomy law contains 20 articles concerning the formation of local political parties. Furthermore, the existence of local political parties in Aceh can be seen in the participation of some of these parties in the 2009 2014 and 2019 general elections. While Article 28 of the Papua Special Autonomy Law which accommodates political parties does not have permanent legal force to be further interpreted as local political parties. it is also not applicable because it is not equipped with government regulations regarding the formation of local political parties in Papua. Even the Constitutional Court through its decision Number 41/PUU-XVII/2019 rejected the judicial review of Article 28 of the Papua Special Autonomy Law.
Criticizing the Verdict of 18/JN/2016/MS.MBO of Mahkamah Syar’iyah Meulaboh Aceh on Sexual Abuse against Children from the Perspective of Restorative Justice Muhammad Siddiq Armia; Zahlul Pasha Karim; A. Hamid Sarong; Muhammad Zulhilmi; Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia
Al-Ihkam, Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Vol 17 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia IAIN Madura collaboration with The Islamic Law Researcher Association (APHI)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19105/al-lhkam.v17i1.4987

Abstract

This article is based on a critical review of the judgment in the Indonesian Islamic Court, known publicly as Mahkamah Syar’iyah, case number 18/JN/2016/MS.MBO. The tribunal process in the Indonesian legal system should present clear evidence that convinces all involved parties, including for sexual abuse cases. Unfortunately, during the tribunal process of the case, the judges had neither asked the prosecutor to show the evidence nor asked how the case had happened. After asking a few simple questions, judges have made consideration and finally a judgment. Two main research questions will be answered in this article; how is restorative justice applied for law-breaking cases in Acehnese view? Why has the punishment been imposed by the Mahkamah Syar'iyah in its legal considerations for the case? This article has used the black-letter law method and interview. The research results have indicated that the case seems weird and does not provide the due process of law principle. The tribunal procedure has not provided any sufficient evidence before the verdict had been decided. The connection between both evidence and judicial facts, in this case, is very blurred. The witness was simply based on the victim's evidence.
Challenging The Principle of Equality Before the Law in Qanun Jinayat Aceh Khairil Akbar; Nyak Fadhlullah; Zahlul Pasha Karim
Media Syari'ah : Wahana Kajian Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 24, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Sharia and Law Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jms.v24i1.9236

Abstract

This article aims to explain how the principle of equality before the law in Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning the Jinayat Law is applied. As part of the Indonesian state, the application of Islamic law (especially in the jinayat) in Aceh should be in line with the characteristics of the rule of law, among which is the principle of equality before the law. Through the statute approach, it turns out that there is a disparity between the Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the regulations above, including the principle of equality before the law. Even though they have equaled men and women, the Qanun Jinayat Aceh clearly distinguishes people based on their religion. A person who is Muslim is obliged to submit to Qanun a quo while those who are not Muslim are in two choices: first, subject to Qanun because of the vacuum of national law; or second, choosing to submit to the Qanun because it is considered lighter than national law. This situation is discriminatory for Muslims on one hand, and unfair to non-Muslims on the other.Artikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan bagaimana prinsip equality before the law dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Hukum Jinayat diterapkan. Sebagai bagian dari negara Indonesia, penerapan syariat Islam (khususnya di bidang jinayat) di Aceh sudah seharusnya tetap sejalan dengan ciri negara hukum yang di antaranya adalah adanya prinsip equality before the law. Melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approaceh), ternyata didapati adanya disparitas antara Qanun Jinayat Aceh dengan peraturan di atasnya, termasuk terhadap prinsip equality before the law. Meski telah menyejajarkan laki-laki dan perempuan, namun Qanun Jinayat Aceh ini secara tegas membedakan seseorang berdasarkan agama yang dianutnya. Seorang yang beragama Islam wajib tunduk pada Qanun a quo sedangkan mereka yang beragama bukan Islam berada pada dua pilihan: pertama, tunduk terhadap Qanun karena kekosongan hukum nasional; atau kedua, memilih tunduk terhadap Qanun karena dirasa lebih ringan dibanding hukum nasional. Keadaan ini diskriminatif bagi orang Islam di satu pihak, dan tidak adil bagi nonmuslim di pihak lain.
Co-Authors A. Hamid Sarong Abdul Jalil Salam Ahmad Siboy Al Faniza, Haddat Bantasyam, Saifuddin Fadhlullah, Nyak Fadlullah, Nyak Haddat Al Faniza Ihdi Karim Makinara Iwan Permadi Karim, Firmansyah Abdul Khairil Akbar Khairil Akbar Muazzinah Muazzinah Muhammad Siddiq Armia Muhammad Syauqi Bin-Armia Muhammad Zulhilmi Mumtazinur Mumtazinur Musdalizar Musdalizar Musrafiyan Musrafiyan Mutiara Fahmi Nyak Fadhlullah Nyak Fadhlullah Sitti Mawar Sumardi Efendi Zakia, Rahmah