Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Tasfiyah

Al-Hurriyah fi Manzur Ma’had Darussalam Gontor Khasib Amrullah; Fatimah Azzahra
Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 3, No 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Darussalam Gontor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (494.157 KB) | DOI: 10.21111/tasfiyah.v3i2.3502

Abstract

Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor is one of the educational institutions inIndonesia that has given a lot of contribution in coloring the national life mosaic. With the concept and purpose of the education which is very supporting in the formation of the ummah, because it is based on Islamic law which refers to the Qur’an and Hadith. It also has a form of life philosophy that guarantees the progress of the nation, named by the five spirit and mottoes of Pondok Modern. One of the most important philosophies in Gontor is freedom and free thinking. Because the freedom and instilled by Gontor aims to make the students select wisely their future life based on Islamic law. However, there are some views that blame this kind of philosophy, it comes from those who have not understood deeply the purpose of Gontor’s education, both outsiders, students, and even graduation. They think that freedom in Gontor caused the student become Liberal, while the essence was no. So, this article wants to examine the essential concept of freedom in the perspective of Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor.
Al-Hurriyah fi Manzur Ma’had Darussalam Gontor Khasib Amrullah; Fatimah Azzahra
Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : University of Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tasfiyah.v3i2.3502

Abstract

Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor is one of the educational institutions inIndonesia that has given a lot of contribution in coloring the national life mosaic. With the concept and purpose of the education which is very supporting in the formation of the ummah, because it is based on Islamic law which refers to the Qur’an and Hadith. It also has a form of life philosophy that guarantees the progress of the nation, named by the five spirit and mottoes of Pondok Modern. One of the most important philosophies in Gontor is freedom and free thinking. Because the freedom and instilled by Gontor aims to make the students select wisely their future life based on Islamic law. However, there are some views that blame this kind of philosophy, it comes from those who have not understood deeply the purpose of Gontor’s education, both outsiders, students, and even graduation. They think that freedom in Gontor caused the student become Liberal, while the essence was no. So, this article wants to examine the essential concept of freedom in the perspective of Pondok Modern Darussalam Gontor.
A Comparative Study of Natural Law Theories: The Views of Thomas F. Wall and Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas Khoirun Nisa, Elvina; Khakim, Usmanul; Hamidah, Setiati; Amrullah, Khasib
Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Darussalam Gontor, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/tasfiyah.v9i1.13989

Abstract

This article aims to analyze and compare the perspectives of Thomas F. Wall and Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas on the concept of natural law, highlighting their differing philosophical traditions. Wall, in “Critical Thinking”, presents a secular understanding of natural law, arguing that it is a human construct originating solely from human reasoning, independent of any divine authority. In contrast, al-Attas, in “Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam”, asserts that natural law, or sunnatullah, is divinely ordained, reflecting God's will in governing the universe while involving human participation. This study employs a philosophical approach grounded in the Islamic worldview to examine and contrast their interpretations, utilizing content analysis to systematically interpret the key arguments in their respective works. The findings reveal a fundamental divergence between the two perspectives: Wall perceives natural law as an innate principle recognized by human reason as the highest moral and ethical authority, whereas al-Attas views it as a manifestation of divine order that governs creation. This contrast underscores the broader epistemological differences between the Western secular and Islamic metaphysical worldviews in understanding the foundation and authority of natural law.