Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Teknisia

STUDI NUMERIK RESPON STRUKTUR MODIFIKASI BANTALAN BETON UNTUK NON-BALLASTED TRACK Danang Purwanto; Iman Satyarno; Andreas Triwiyono
TEKNISIA Vol. XXIV, No. 1, Mei 2019
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/teknisia.vol24.iss1.art2

Abstract

According to Rencana Induk Perkeretaapian Nasional (RIPNas), making  plans for the development of Indonesian railways until the next 2030. The targets for the development of railway networks and services to be achieved in 2030 include a national network of 12,100 km (spread on Java-Bali, Sumatra, Kalimantan, Sulawesi and Papua). Construction of railway track is generally divided into two main types, namely, ballasted tracks and non-ballast tracks.  In this study the non-ballasted track or ballastless track is to modify the width of the sleeper  that will be used without using ballasts on the railroad tracks. This is done to reduce the use of coarse aggregates in ballasts so that if used in areas that do not have natural resources in the form of coarse aggregates a railway track can be built. The research will be carried out according to the condition of the soil gravel, dense sand, medium dense sand, silty medium dense dan loose sand. Different types of soil cause different responses or behaviors from the modification of the sleeper  that are located above the ground. This study will discuss the analysis of rail displacement and rail bending stress that occur in the modification of railroad concrete sleeper  for non-ballast use in some soil conditions. The study was conducted with software SAP2000 version 2014 to analyze  displacement and rail bending stress on concrete sleeper modification with dimensions 400 x 2440 mm2; 1200 x 2440 mm2; 2000 x 2440 mm2; 2800 x 2440 mm2 dan 3600 x 2440 mm2 for each different type of soil to determine the dimensions of modification of concrete sleeper  that can be used. According AREMA(1999) Result of rail displacement rail may not exceed 6 mm and rail bending  stress may not exceed 75 N/mm2.
KUAT TEKAN PANEL DINDING BETON RINGAN EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE DENGAN LAPIS LUAR PAPAN KALSIUM SILIKAT Desi Maryani; Ashar Saputra; Andreas Triwiyono
TEKNISIA Vol. XXIV, No. 1, Mei 2019
Publisher : Jurusan Teknik Sipil, Fakultas Teknik Sipil dan Perencanaan, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/teknisia.vol24.iss1.art1

Abstract

The need for housing in Indonesia reaches around 1 million houses per year is the reason behind an increasing demand for building materials. Prefabricated wall panels can be used as alternative building materials that have easy and fast advantages in installation. In addition, the use of precast wall panels will also save labor costs. In this study, expanded polystyrene (EPS) lightweight concrete wall panels were a composite with calcium silicate boards. Furthermore, the unity of these materials are called a sandwich panel. The purpose of this study was to determine the potential use of sandwich panels as structural wall panels in terms of compressive strength. Test specimens were 9 EPS panels measuring 1800x610x75mm; 3 of them were a composite with GRC board, 3 other with GRC board outer layer and bolt connector, and 3 panels without reinforcement. The used calcium silicate board is a trade name of GRC board with a thickness of 4mm. Compressive strength testing is carried out referring to SNI 03-3122-1992 (Fibrous Lightweight Concrete Panel).The test results obtained the compressive strength of PP-T, PGP-T, PGB-T panels in a row of 0.72 MPa, 0.84 MPa, and 1.43 MPa. The pattern of damage to the test object was marked by the release of the outer layer of the GRC board and the wall panel was fractured. It can be concluded that the addition of the GRC board outer layer and bolt connector can increase the compressive strength of the wall panel up to 200%. In contrast, the PP-T, PGP-T, and PGB-T panels do not meet the requirements of SNI 03-3122-1992. The resulted compressive strengths are so low that make the expanded polystyrene concrete panel is not avaiable for bearing wall purpose.