Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.542
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Dinamika Hukum The Southeast Asia Law Journal Syntax Idea Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH)
Hedwig Adianto Mau
Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Jayabaya
Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Automotive Engineering Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge

 1   2 
POLITIK HUKUM PENGUATAN FUNGSI LEGISLASI DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH BERDASARKAN UUD NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945 Fernando Hasibuan; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Rotua Valentina Sagala
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 9: Februari 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i9.9732

Abstract

In Indonesia's constitutional system, the Regional Representative Council (DPD) plays a crucial role in representing regional interests. The legislative function of the DPD is explicitly regulated under Article 22D of the 1945 Constitution (third amendment). Although the DPD is granted the authority to propose and provide considerations on certain bills, the main issue lies in the limited scope of its authority, which does not include the final decision-making power in the legislative process. The theories employed in this study are the theory of legal politics and the theory of the constitution.The type of research in this study is categorized as normative or doctrinal legal research, involving a statutory approach and an analytical approach. The legal materials used are sourced from secondary data, comprising primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials, collected through a literature review. The data analysis in this legal research employs a qualitative approach.The research findings indicate that the regulation of the DPD in the 1945 Constitution, the MD3 Law, and the P3 Law highlights its strategic role in proposing and providing input on bills related to regional interests, despite its limited authority often being overshadowed by the dominance of the House of Representatives (DPR). For instance, the MD3 Law, particularly Article 122, weakens the legislative function of the DPD by regulating the tasks and powers of the DPR without allocating adequate participation for the DPD in the legislative process. Furthermore, legal policy through Constitutional Court Decision No. 92/PUU-X/2012 has strengthened the legislative role of the DPD by recognizing its equal standing with the DPR and the President in proposing, discussing, and providing views on bills, particularly those concerning regional autonomy, central-regional relations, and fiscal balance, ensuring that national policies are more equitable and inclusive
REKONSTRUKSI KEWENANGAN DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH DALAM SISTEM PARLEMEN BIKAMERAL DI INDONESIA Mario Setiawan; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Rotua Valentina Sagala
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 9: Februari 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i9.9734

Abstract

DPD sebagai representasi kepentingan daerah keberadaannya sangat signifikan dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Kedudukan DPD diakomodir dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945. Dalam perkembanganya kewenangan DPD sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 22D UUD NRI Tahun 1945 menunjukkan bahwa peran DPD terbatas sebagai co-legislator dari DPR. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan teori pembagian kekuasaan negara dan teori kewenangan.Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif. Dari sekian banyak pendekatan dalam penelitian hukum, penulis memilih untuk menggunakan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach), pendekatan komparatif (comparative approach), dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Selain itu, penelitian ini dilakukan dengan mengkaji bahan pustaka atau data sekunder, yang meliputi bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tertier. Data tersebut dikumpulkan melalui penelitian kepustakaan (library research) dan hasilnya dianalisis menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif.Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa kedudukan DPD dalam sistem parlemen bikameral di Indonesia diatur dalam UUD NRI Tahun 1945, khususnya Pasal 22C dan 22D, yang menegaskan perannya sebagai perwakilan daerah dengan kewenangan terbatas dalam legislasi dan pengawasan. Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 jo. Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2019 mengatur sembilan kewenangan DPD, yang kemudian diuraikan menjadi sebelas kewenangan dalam Peraturan DPD Nomor 2 Tahun 2024. Namun, DPD masih menghadapi kendala dalam menjalankan fungsinya sebagai kamar kedua dalam sistem legislatif, terutama karena keterbatasan kewenangan yang diberikan oleh konstitusi, sehingga perannya lebih bersifat sebagai dewan pertimbangan DPR. Selain itu, rekonstruksi kewenangan DPD dalam sistem parlemen bikameral di Indonesia perlu dilakukan dengan memberikan kewenangan yang seimbang dengan DPR, khususnya dalam legislasi, pengawasan, dan anggaran. Ketimpangan yang terjadi akibat sistem bikameral asimetris, di mana DPR memiliki kewenangan lebih dominan, membuat mekanisme checks and balances kurang efektif, terutama dalam pengawasan kebijakan yang berdampak pada daerah. Oleh karena itu, penguatan DPD melalui keseimbangan kewenangan menjadi langkah penting untuk meningkatkan efektivitas sistem parlemen bikameral di Indonesia.
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEJABAT NEGARA PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENYALAHGUNAAN KEWENANGAN DALAM PENGADAAN BARANG DAN JASA OLEH PEMERINTAH Fitri Mastuti Nurul Fuadah; Tofik Yanuar Chandra; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9850

Abstract

The phenomenon of abuse of power in government procurement of goods and services often occurs due to opportunities arising from weaknesses in the system of oversight and internal control. State officials involved in this process often exploit their positions and authority to gain personal or group benefits. Abuse of power by state officials in the procurement of goods and services is one form of corruption that has serious consequences for national development. The theories employed in this study are the theory of law enforcement and the theory of legal certainty.This research is a normative law research utilizing the statute approach, case approach, and conceptual approach. The types and sources of legal materials used in this research are categorized into three groups: primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. To obtain relevant materials for the discussion in this paper, the author used library research techniques, analyzed through a normative approach (descriptive-qualitative).The research findings indicate that the authority of state officials in the procurement of government goods and services is regulated in the Penal Code (Articles 209, 415, 417, and 421), as well as other legislative regulations such as Article 3 of Law Number 31 of 1999 jo Law Number 20 of 2001, and Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018 jo Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 2021, to prevent abuse of office for personal gain. Law enforcement against state officials who abuse their authority in procurement should be carried out fairly, transparently, and decisively to prevent corruption that harms the state. Deviations such as collusion, bribery, and abuse of office often occur due to weak oversight and a corrupt bureaucratic culture. The imposition of criminal sanctions based on Law Number 31 of 1999 jo Law Number 20 of 2001 as a last resort (ultimum remedium) aims to create a deterrent effect and ensure legal certainty.
EFEKTIFITAS HUKUM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS MELALUI RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Agus Wicaksono Susanto; Maryano, Maryano; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9851

Abstract

Normatively, Law Number 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transport has comprehensively regulated various provisions that must be adhered to by the offender in traffic accidents involving victims. In the context of traffic accidents, if the accident is caused by culpa levis, it can be resolved through a restorative justice approach. This research utilizes the theory of restorative justice and the theory of legal effectiveness.This research falls into the category of empirical legal research, using two approaches simultaneously, namely the statute approach and the case approach. The legal materials in this research were obtained from primary and secondary data, consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In this research, the results obtained from primary and secondary data were further analyzed. The data analysis process was conducted using an interpretative approach.The research results indicate that the concept of restorative justice in the settlement of traffic accident cases in Indonesia has been applied in various law enforcement agencies, including the Police, the Prosecutor's Office, and the Courts. In the stages of investigation and inquiry, the Police refer to the Chief of Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021, the Prosecutor's Office follows the Prosecutor General Regulation Number 15 of 2020, and the Court refers to the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2024. Although these regulations are binding for each agency, their implementation remains separate, which leads to the potential for differing interpretations among law enforcement agencies, affecting the justice process received by both the offender and the victim. The effectiveness of settling traffic accident cases through restorative justice has proven to be effective in resolving disputes peacefully, especially in cases of unintentional negligence. However, voluntary participation from both parties is crucial to its success. Although restorative justice has been applied in several cases in court, its implementation in Indonesia is not yet uniform and consistent. Certain cases, particularly those involving accidents with fatalities, still end in prison sentences.
KEWENANGAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL BEA DAN CUKAI DALAM PEMUNGUTAN BEA MASUK TINDAKAN PENGAMANAN ATAS KAIN IMPOR Yohanes Pradipta Eka Yudha Adi Nugraha; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Mardi Candra
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9852

Abstract

The Textile and Textile Products (TPT) industry is one of the vital sectors in international trade for Indonesia. With the issue of increased imported fabrics, the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, which holds the authority under Law Number 17 of 2006 on Amendments to Law Number 10 of 1995 on Customs, is tasked with regulating, supervising, and collecting import duties to protect the domestic industry from the negative impacts of international trade. One of the instruments used is the imposition of Safeguard Import Duties (BMTP), which is applied when a surge in imports of certain goods, such as fabrics, poses a serious threat to the sustainability of the domestic industry. The theories used in this study are the theory of the Pancasila state and the theory of legal certainty.The type of research used in this study is normative legal research utilizing secondary data sourced from library materials, including primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. In this study, data processing was carried out by systematically organizing legal materials.The research findings indicate that the authority of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise in collecting Safeguard Duty (BMTP) on imported fabrics is in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 10 of 1995 in conjunction with Law Number 17 of 2006 and Minister of Finance Regulation (PMK) Number 48 of 2024. Articles 16 and 17 of Law Number 17 of 2006 on Customs grant customs officials and the Director General of Customs and Excise the authority to determine and collect Import Duty (BM) on imported goods, including BMTP. In the context of imposing BMTP on imported fabrics, customs officials and the Director General of Customs and Excise exercise their functions based on policies established by the Minister of Finance through PMK Number 48 of 2024, as stipulated in Article 23D, paragraph (2) of Law Number 17 of 2006 on Customs. An ideal legal framework for BMTP collection policy on imported fabrics is realized through the principle of legal certainty, as reflected in PMK Number 48 of 2024 and Law Number 10 of 1995 in conjunction with Law Number 17 of 2006. This legal certainty encompasses a clear legal basis, transparent procedures, avoidance of overlapping policies, non-discrimination, and a well-defined objection and appeal mechanism. Furthermore, the implementation of BMTP policy emphasizes information transparency, periodic evaluations, and consistent supervision to enhance public trust in the legal system while maintaining a balance between protecting domestic industries and safeguarding consumer interests.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PELAKU NOODWEER DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN Ekky Saputra; Maryano, Maryano; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9856

Abstract

As a manifestation of the principle of the rule of law, every criminal act, referred to in the Indonesian Penal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana or KUHP) as a criminal offense (delict), can only be resolved through the applicable legal mechanisms, namely criminal law. An individual may be acquitted of charges if proven not guilty or if the act of violence was committed in self-defense, as regulated under Article 49 of the KUHP, commonly known as "noodweer". The theories employed in this study include the theory of legal protection and the theory of justice. Additionally, the author provides a general review of evidence and noodweer based on various sources.This study adopts a normative juridical research approach. The author utilizes the statute approach and case approach, relying on legal materials derived from secondary data, which consist of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collected through library research is then analyzed descriptively.The findings of this study indicate that the legal provisions for individuals acting in noodweer in cases of homicide refer to Article 49(1) of the KUHP. This provision regulates "emergency defense" or "forced defense" (noodweer) carried out to protect oneself, others, morality, or property from an imminent and unlawful attack or threat of attack. The forms of legal protection granted to individuals acting in noodweer in cases of homicide align with the principle of justice in criminal law, which emphasizes a balance between individual rights protection and legal interests. These forms of legal protection include: Exemption from punishment (strafuitsluitingsgrond), The right to present a defense in court, The right to legal assistance, and Judicial considerations in rendering a verdict, where judges have the discretion to assess whether an act qualifies as noodweer or falls under the category of noodweer excess (excessive self-defense).
KEWENANGAN PENGADILAN PAJAK DALAM MEMUTUS SENGKETA GUGATAN DI BIDANG KEPABEANAN Romadhani Setio Prabowo; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Rotua Valentina Sagala
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 10: Maret 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jirk.v4i10.9860

Abstract

The Tax Court, established under Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court, is a specialized judicial body under the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court. This court is authorized to resolve disputes in the field of taxation, including customs matters. The Tax Court has the authority to adjudicate disputes based on Article 31(1) of Law Number 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court.This study falls within the category of normative juridical research. The author employs three approaches: the statute approach, the case approach, and the conceptual approach. Data were obtained from secondary data collected through library research or documentary study in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, analyzed qualitatively.The research findings indicate that the authority of the Tax Court in resolving customs disputes is regulated under Article 31 of Law Number 14 of 2002 on the Tax Court, which includes both appeals and lawsuits. However, Article 95 of Law Number 17 of 2006 on Customs limits legal remedies against the Reassessment of Tariff and/or Customs Value (SPKTNP) to the appeal mechanism only, without mentioning lawsuits as a legal option. This inconsistency creates legal uncertainty, as the Tax Court has the authority to examine lawsuits, while Law Number 17 of 2006 on Customs, as a lex specialis, only regulates appeals. Although the Tax Court has the authority to handle both appeals and lawsuits, Article 95 of Law Number 17 of 2006 on Customs, as a lex specialis, restricts legal remedies to appeals only. Therefore, the ideal concept in its application is to affirm the principle of lex specialis derogat legi generali, meaning that lawsuits against decisions of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise (DJBC) should be deemed inadmissible, and appeals should be the sole legitimate legal recourse.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI NOTARIS AKIBAT PEMALSUAN SALINAN AKTA NOTARIS YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH PIHAK LAIN YANG BUKAN PENGHADAP Asty Lestari Pratama Putri; Putra Hutomo; Hedwig Adianto Mau
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 11: April 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Notaries as public officials are authorized to assist the goverment in terms of making an authentic deeds. Each notaries responsible for every deeds that been made, either in the form fo minutes of deeds or copies of notarial deeds. In carrying the duties as notaries, they have rights to be under protection of law from goverment and related organization. Research problems in this study are to see what are legal concequences of forged copies of notarial deeds by other parties who are not the parties? And what are the legal protection for notaries against forged copies of notarial deeds by other parties who are not the parties? This study, using theory of protection law by Satjipto Rahardjo and theory of legal consequences by Soeroso.Method in this study uses Types of Normative Juridical Research that is a literature legal research or secondary data with primary, secondary, tertiary legal material resource. As for the approach of this study uses Legislative Approach, Conceptual Approach, Analytical Approach, and Case Approach. And collection of the legal material done by identifies and inventories positive rule of law, literature, journal, and other legal material. As for analysis technique for legal material done by Grammatical law interpretation and analogical law construction method.The result of this study shows that consequences of legal for forged copies of notarial deeds by other parties who are not parties are, the notarial deeds still bind for every parties and is a protection for notaries. Things that can be done by notaries are to include an exoneration clause in the contents of the notarial deeds to mitigate problem in the future. It is suggested that notaries could be more cautious in publishing copy of deeds and keeps digitalized copy of deeds to avoid forgery.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM KEBIJAKAN NASIONAL DALAM PENGEMBANGAN KOMPETENSI BAGI PEGAWAI NEGERI SIPIL MELALUI JALUR PENDIDIKAN Herdia Noor Hafnita; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Mardi Candra
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 4 No. 11: April 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Proffesionalism is one of the key factors in the success of civil servants (PNS) in implementing public policies, providing services to the community, and fostering unity in national life. Professionalism reflects a person's attitude and competence in a specific field when performing their duties. A civil servant's professionalism can be developed through various means, one of which is education, either through funded study assignments or self-financed study programs. In carrying out study assignments, national regulations are needed to provide legal guidelines for their implementation. These include requirements for study assignments, their execution, the rights and obligations of employees undertaking them, as well as monitoring and evaluation of the process. Currently, regulations related to study assignments for civil servants refer to Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 1961 and the Prime Minister's Decree Number 224/MP/1961. However, these regulations are no longer relevant to current conditions, and many aspects of employee competency development require updated provisions. Therefore, it is necessary to establish new national regulations to revise or replace Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 1961 and the Prime Minister's Decree Number 224/MP/1961.The research method used is normative juridical with a statute approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach, and case approach, utilizing Gustav Radbruch's theory of legal certainty and competency theory.The research results indicate that the current national policy on civil servant competency development through education, as stipulated in Presidential Regulation Number 12 of 1961 and the Prime Minister's Decree Number 224/MP/1961, is no longer relevant or aligned with current developments. Additionally, the circular issued by the Ministry of State Apparatus Utilization, which serves as a guideline for competency development, lacks legal force. Therefore, a regulation governing the competency development of civil servants through education is necessary to align with existing laws and regulations, ensuring legal certainty in its implementation.
KEWENANGAN SATUAN POLISI PAMONG PRAJA DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGAS TERTIB BANGUNAN Syaepudin, Mohamad; Hedwig Adianto Mau; Rotua Valentina Sagala
Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Vol. 5 No. 1: Juni 2025
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implementasi ketertiban umum dalam pelaksanaan kewenangan tugas tertib bangunan dan tumpang tindih antar Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dan Dinas Cipta Karya Tata Ruang dan Pertanahan (CITATA). Latar belakang masalah Masih banyaknya pelanggaran ketertiban umum dalam pelaksanaan tertib bangunan yang terjadi, sehingga perlu dilakukan penelitian untuk mengetahui kewenangan Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dan Dinas CITATA dalam mengatasi masalah tersebut. Fenomena yang diteliti adalah pelaksanaan kewenangan tugas tertib bangunan oleh Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dan Dinas CITATA. Namun, penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa kewenangan Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dalam melaksanakan tertib bangunan masih belum lengkap dan jelas, sehingga perlu dilakukan peningkatan kapasitas dan kemampuan personil Satpol PP dalam melaksanakan tuga, serta menghindari tumpang tindih dengan instansi lain. seperti Dinas CITATA. Rumusan masalah penelitian ini adalah "Bagaimana pengaturan kewenangan Satpol PP dalam melaksanakan tugas tertib bangunan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan sebagai upaya untuk mendapatkan data yang diperlukan sehubungan dengan permasalahan. Data yang digunakan dengan data sekunder dan bahan hukum tertier. Disamping itu juga digunakan data primer sebagai pendukung bahan hukum data sekunder. Untuk analis data dilakukan dengan metode analisis yuridis kualitatif. Dari hasil penelitian dapat diperoleh pengaturan kewenangan Satpol PP dalam melaksanakan tugas tertib bangunan telah diatur dalam beberapa peraturan perundang-undangan. Namun, masih diperlukan konsep ideal kewenangan Satpol PP yang meliputi kewenangan yang jelas dan tegas dan tidak tumpang tindih yang dimiliki Satuan Polisi Pamong Praja dengan kewenangan Citata yang dituangkan dalam Peraturan Daerah. Untuk meningkatkan efektifitas pelaksanaan tugas tertib bangunan, perlu dilakukan harmonisasi peraturan dan revisi Peraturan Gubernur tentang kewenangan masing-masing instansi.
Co-Authors Agung Bayu Adji Agus Wicaksono Susanto Ahsanta Maulana Aldi Rizky Setiyawan Ani Afrilda Sinaga Asty Lestari Pratama Putri Brianta Petra Ginting Candra, Mardi Deviani Nur Amalina Edwin Efrizal HS Eka Sakti Panca Indraningsih Ekky Saputra Fernando Hasibuan Fitri Mastuti Nurul Fuadah Herdia Noor Hafnita Mardi Candra Maria Anna Samiyati Mario Setiawan Maryano, Maryano Nur Hakim Oktinardo Mandira Dulage Kansil Petrus Yakobus Bapa Prijanto, Prijanto Putra Hutomo Ramlani Lina Sinaulan Ratib, Victor Albadi’u Romadhani Setio Prabowo Rotua Valentina Sagala Sarikin, Sarikin Sirajuddin Sirajuddin Syaepudin, Mohamad Tofik Yanuar Chandra Tofik Yanuar Chandra Umar Suryadi Bakry Yohanes Pradipta Eka Yudha Adi Nugraha Yuhelson Yuhelson