Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.658
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Berajah Journal Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum International Journal of Business and Quality Research
Pandri Zulfikar
Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
PENGARUH PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA ARBITRASE TERHADAP KEPASTIAN HUKUM PERSEROAN Ervawati; Pandri Zulfikar; Dede Agus Sodikin; Djamal Efendi; Imam Fathwa
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Berajah Journal
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i3.572

Abstract

Dispute resolution is a fundamental aspect of legal practice, particularly in the business and corporate context. Arbitration, as one of the mechanisms for dispute resolution outside the ordinary courts, has provided a significant alternative for business entities, including limited liability companies. This study aims to analyse the impact of dispute resolution through arbitration on legal certainty for companies in Indonesia. The research method employed is a normative legal approach, utilising legislative and conceptual frameworks. The findings indicate that arbitration makes a positive contribution to legal certainty for limited liability companies through the final and binding nature of its awards, the efficiency of dispute resolution timelines, and the protection of business confidentiality. However, there are several obstacles affecting the optimisation of arbitration’s function, including legal uncertainty regarding the enforcement of arbitral awards, limitations on the scope of disputes that can be resolved through arbitration, and the relatively high costs of arbitration. Based on the results of the analysis, this study recommends the need to revise Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution to provide more comprehensive legal protection for companies.
Co-Authors Akhmad Faishal Andriyani Susilawati Anharyanto Asep Mulyana Asri Cahyadi Bachtiar Kemal Harahap Bayu Triwibowo Dadang Rachmat Dede Agus Sodikin Dewi Rahayu Dian Retno Widayati Djamal Efendi Ervawati Gatot Subroto Hikmat Ansori Imam Fathwa Juhana Nuryana M Zaenuddin Ibrahim M. Ali Akbar Muhammad Rizki Azhari Muhammad Ruhunussa Muslimin Naek Efendi Nida Lailatu Syabani Ratu Chumairoh Noor Rifqi Syifa’ul Qolbi Saparudin Saparudin Supendi Supriadi Teddy T Pingak Totok Handono Tri Susanto Tugimin Harjotaruno