Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Electronic Criminal Justice in Indonesia: Challenges and the Future Measures Barlian, Aristo Evandy A.; Latipulhayat, Atip; Rusmiati, Elis; Wulandari, Widati; Sukma, Ahmad Novindri Aji
Jambura Law Review VOLUME 7 NO. 1 JANUARY 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33756/jlr.v7i1.27805

Electronic trials represent a radical innovation within the judicial system, viewed as a means to simplify and facilitate access to justice for those seeking it. However, electronic criminal trials continue to present both legal and technical challenges. This writing aims to explore the development of electronic criminal trials in Indonesia and compare them with several other countries. It also outlines the issues and challenges involved, while proposing future measures to ensure electronic trials function as intended. The approach used in this paper is based on statutory and comparative methods. The findings indicate that radical innovations, particularly in electronic trials, highlight the need for sustainability, but also reveal legal and technical challenges. The legal aspect concerns the level of regulation within the Supreme Court Regulations, which ideally should be elevated to the level of the Criminal Procedure Code. There is also ambiguity regarding the criteria for implementing electronic criminal trials. Compared to the United States, where clear criteria are established, Indonesia lacks such clarity. On the technical aspect, challenges such as unequal access to the internet, network disparities, and limited human resources need to be addressed. For the future success of electronic criminal trials, it is necessary to establish clear regulations at the level of the Criminal Procedure Code; provide equal network access to ensure electronic trials can be conducted in all courts across Indonesia; improve the quality of electronic trial services, especially for vulnerable groups (such as the elderly and people with disabilities); and enhance data security systems to protect personal information, as demonstrated by Kyrgyzstan.

IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 162 UNDANG-UNDANG MINERBA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KRIMINOLOGI MARXIST DAN POSMODERN Perpetua, Sepania Immanuella Magdalena; Wulandari, Widati; Sulistyani, Wanodyo
YUSTISI Vol 12 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v12i2.18985

Abstrak Pro-kontra akibat janji ganti rugi, penolakan kegiatan tambang oleh masyarakat di areal tambang, dan lainnya kerap terjadi di bidang pertambangan. Pasal 162 UU Minerba secara spesifik mengatur mengenai ancaman pidana bagi orang-orang yang “merintangi atau mengganggu” kegiatan usaha pertambangan yang memiliki izin dan telah melaksanakan kewajiban pembebasan lahan. Pada kenyataannya, tindakan merintangi atau mengganggu yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat tersebut memiliki latar belakang yang lebih kompleks. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa, Pasal 162 UU Minerba dan implementasinya melalui pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan yuridis-empiris dengan menggunakan teori kriminologi posmodern dan marxis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat isu ekonomi dan penguasaan bahasa yang kental dalam pembentukan dan penerapan pasal ini yang menyebabkan tendensi penerapan pasal yang menyudutkan masyarakat, terutama masyarakat di sekitar area pertambangan.

The Digital Transformation of Criminal Justice: A Comparative Examination of Indonesia’s E-Court System and Global Best Practices Barlian, Aristo Evandy A.; Latipulhayat, Atip; Rusmiati, Elis; Wulandari, Widati; Sukma, Ahmad Novindri Aji
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.14341

In an era marked by the algorithmic mediation of human affairs, the pursuit of justice can no longer be disentangled from the architecture of digital systems that sustain it. The criminal justice system, long rooted in analog procedures and institutional inertia, faces an existential imperative: adapt or risk obsolescence. Within this context, digital transformation is not merely an administrative upgrade—it is a normative challenge to the principles of due process, transparency, and equality before the law. Indonesia’s hesitant transition toward e-criminal justice reveals a complex interplay of structural, legal, and epistemic limitations. This study aims to analyze the development of e-criminal justice in Indonesia by conducting a comparative assessment of successful digital judicial systems in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Singapore. Employing a normative legal research approach with a comparative legal method, this study examines primary and secondary legal sources to identify regulatory gaps, procedural challenges, and strategic solutions. The findings reveal that Indonesia’s legal framework remains insufficient in addressing key procedural safeguards, digital evidence authentication, and cybersecurity risks. Additionally, disparities in digital access, resistance from legal practitioners, and inadequate technological infrastructure hinder the effective implementation of e-criminal justice. Comparative analysis suggests that successful digital transformation requires a robust regulatory foundation, secure and interoperable digital platforms, structured judicial training programs, and policies ensuring digital inclusivity. To optimize its e-criminal justice framework, Indonesia must adopt a context-sensitive and adaptive strategy, balancing technological advancements with fundamental principles of procedural fairness and judicial integrity. Future research should explore the long-term impact of digitalization on judicial decision-making, the role of AI in legal processes, and the effectiveness of cybersecurity mechanisms in safeguarding judicial independence. This study contributes to the broader discourse on the intersection between technology and justice, providing recommendations for a sustainable and equitable digital transformation of Indonesia’s criminal justice system.

IMPLEMENTASI PASAL 162 UNDANG-UNDANG MINERBA DALAM PERSPEKTIF KRIMINOLOGI MARXIST DAN POSMODERN Perpetua, Sepania Immanuella Magdalena; Wulandari, Widati; Sulistyani, Wanodyo
YUSTISI Vol 12 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Ibn Khaldun Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/yustisi.v12i2.18985

Abstrak Pro-kontra akibat janji ganti rugi, penolakan kegiatan tambang oleh masyarakat di areal tambang, dan lainnya kerap terjadi di bidang pertambangan. Pasal 162 UU Minerba secara spesifik mengatur mengenai ancaman pidana bagi orang-orang yang “merintangi atau mengganggu” kegiatan usaha pertambangan yang memiliki izin dan telah melaksanakan kewajiban pembebasan lahan. Pada kenyataannya, tindakan merintangi atau mengganggu yang dilakukan oleh masyarakat tersebut memiliki latar belakang yang lebih kompleks. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa, Pasal 162 UU Minerba dan implementasinya melalui pendekatan yuridis-normatif dan yuridis-empiris dengan menggunakan teori kriminologi posmodern dan marxis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat isu ekonomi dan penguasaan bahasa yang kental dalam pembentukan dan penerapan pasal ini yang menyebabkan tendensi penerapan pasal yang menyudutkan masyarakat, terutama masyarakat di sekitar area pertambangan.

IMPLIKASI PENGATURAN PELANGGARAN HAM BERAT DALAM KUHP 2023 TERHADAP KEBERLAKUAN ASAS-ASAS KHUSUSNYA: PENGUATAN ATAU PELEMAHAN? Rizqiqa, Larasati Dwi; Wulandari, Widati; Putri, Nella Sumika
LITIGASI Vol. 25 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.12416

This paper discusses the impact of the regulation of gross violation of human rights in the Penal Code 2023 on the validity of the principles stipulated in Act Number 26, 2000 as the special law. The method used is normative research with data collection through literature study. The findings show that regarding the Article 187 and Article 620 of the Penal Code 2023, it can be said that these articles have actually provided a ‘guarantee’ to ensure that the existence of the Penal Code 2023 will not reduce or have any impact on the special principles in Act Number 26,2000. This is then strengthened by the provisions of Article 622 paragraph 1 letter m which only revokes several articles from the Act, namely Articles 8, 9, 36-40 on criminal offenses and sanctions for gross violation of human right. By using the theory of codification & the amendment of Article 3 of the Penal Code 2023, it was revealed that the regulation on gross violation of human right in the Penal Code 2023 is potentially to create new problems, from the issue of conflict of principles to of multiple interpretations. Different interpretations of Article 187, Article 620, and Article 3 of the Penal Code 2023 can actually lead to the inapplicability of special principles stipulated in Act Number 26, 2000, therefore, the provisions of gross violation of human right, in the future, are very likely to be subject to the general principles contained in Book I of the Penal Code 2023.

POLITIK HUKUM KEWARGANEGARAAN INDONESIA: STUDI TERHADAP STATUS WARGANEGARA YANG MENJADI FOREIGN TERORIST FIGHTERS (FTF) ISIS Kustiwa, Iwa; Harijanti, Susi Dwi; Wulandari, Widati
LITIGASI Vol. 24 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.6951

Government policy reflects the extent to which Indonesian citizenship law accommodates the issue of Foreign Terrorist Fighter (FTF)s, as well as future projections of what can be done against FTF based on related laws and regulations, especially those related to citizenship laws. The method used in this study is normative juridical, with data collection through literature study. The results showed that the citizenship status of Foreign Terrorist Fighters from Indonesia based on a human rights perspective, the state can only revoke a person's citizenship based on a court decision. A person's citizenship status is a fundamental right, and a precious right, therefore, the rights of every citizen must be recognized, respected, protected, facilitated, and fulfilled by the state. In solving the problem of citizenship status of former FTF from Indonesia, it is necessary to improve performance and cooperation in the deradicalization process by all elements of the Government and Law Enforcement Officers commanded by the National Counterterrorism Agency and the development of sterile area infrastructure with a high security system to carry out the deradicalization process while carrying out the FTF citizenship status determination trial process. Keywords: Law, Citizenship, Foreign Terrorist Fighters.

TINDAKAN DOXING DI MEDIA SOSIAL BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PERUBAHAN ATAS UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK DIKAITKAN DENGAN KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN PRIVASI Salsabila, Dinda; Dewi, Sinta; Wulandari, Widati
QIYAS: JURNAL HUKUM ISLAM DAN PERADILAN Vol 8, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29300/qys.v8i1.2664

Abstract: There is a phenomenon on the internet called doxing or the act of publishing private information about someone on the internet, typically with malicious intent. Doxing act violates people rights of their privacy of personal data. Not only with malicious intent, doxing act often carried out by victims of crime to seek justice. This study aims to determine the application of the protection of personal data principals from doxing act in ITE Law and to identify the legal liability of doxing actions on social media that is carried out by victims of crime in related to the concept of privacy protection.This research was conducted using normative juridical approach and descriptive analytical research specifications, namely by describing the issue with the phenomenon being studied as the research object, in this case doxing act, and then reviewed with secondary data. The data analysis was carried out using a qualitative juridical method.The results of the study show that in the ITE Law, the protection of personal data from doxing act can be found in Article 26 (1) regarding the consent to disclose personal data, Article 27 (1), (3), and (4) regarding to the content of personal data that is disclosed, and Article 30 (2) regarding to the method in obtaining the content or personal data that is disclosed. Doxing actions on social media carried out by victims of crime to seek justice in the concept of privacy protection can be held legally responsible under the ITE Law Article 26 by filing a lawsuit, criminal sanctions and fines based on Article 45 (1), (3), and (4) and Article 46 (2), or administrative sanctions based on the Ministry of Communication and Informatics Regulation No. 20 of 2016 Article 36 such as verbal and written warnings, temporary suspension of activities and/or announcements on online websites. Keywords: Privacy and Personal Data Protection, Doxing, Legal Liability Abstrak: Terdapat fenomena di internet yaitu tindakan doxing atau tindakan mempublikasikan data pribadi seseorang tanpa izin di internet dengan maksud atau niat jahat. Tindakan doxing melanggar privasi seseorang atas data pribadinya. Tidak hanya dengan maksud atau niat jahat, tindakan doxing sering dilakukan korban kejahatan untuk mencari keadilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan prinsip-prinsip perlindungan data pribadi dari tindakan doxing dalam UU ITE serta untuk mengidentifikasi pertanggungjawaban hukum atas tindakan doxing di media sosial yang dilakukan oleh korban kejahatan dikaitkan dengan konsep perlindungan privasi.Penelitian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normative dengan spesifikasi penilitian deskriptif analitis yaitu dengan menggambarkan permasalahan terkait peristiwa yang menjadi objek penelitian, dalam hal ini tindakan doxing, kemudian ditinjau dengan data sekunder. Kemudian dilakukan analisis data dengan metode yuridis kualitatif.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam UU ITE perlindungan data pribadi dari tindakan doxing dapat ditemukan pada Pasal 26 ayat 1 berkaitan ada atau tidaknya persetujuan (consent) diungkapkan suatu data pribadi, Pasal 27 ayat 1, 3 dan 4 berkaitan dengan muatan atau bentuk data pribadi yang diungkapkan, serta Pasal 30 ayat 2 berkaitan cara perolehan muatan atau data pribadi yang diungkapkan. Tindakan doxing di media sosial yang dilakukan oleh korban kejahatan untuk mencari keadilan secara konsep perlindungan privasi dapat diminta pertanggungjawaban hukum berdasarkan UU ITE Pasal 26 dengan mengajukan gugatan perbuatan melawan hukum, penjatuhan sanksi pidana dan denda sesuai Pasal 45 ayat 1, 3 dan 4 dan Pasal 46 ayat 2 atau dengan sanksi administratif sesuai Permen Kominfo 20/2016 Pasal 36 berupa peringatan lisan, tertulis, penghentian sementara kegiatan dan/atau pengumuman di situs dalam jaringan (website online). Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Privasi dan Data Pribadi, Tindakan Doxing, Pertanggungjawaban hukum

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 17 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 17 Documents
Search