Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.223
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI JURNAL PIONIR Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat CITRA JUSTICIA : Majalah Hukum dan Dinamika Kemasyarakatan Jurnal Pemberdayaan Sosial dan Teknologi Masyarakat Hukum dan Demokrasi (HD) Ardhi: Jurnal Pengabdian dalam Negri Compromise Journal : Community Proffesional Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia
Suriani Suriani
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Asahan
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 23 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ELECTRONIC MEDIATION AS A RESOLUTION OF DIVORCE CASES IN THE TANJUNGBALAI RELIGIOUS COURTS Suriani Suriani; Salim Fauzi Lubis; Junindra Martua; Siti Hajar Siregar; Chairanda Al Azmi
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 12, No 2 (2024): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v12i2.5380

Abstract

To achieve peaceful dispute resolution, the Supreme Court has shifted from a court approach to a legal dispute resolution approach by utilizing electronic media in the current modern era in order to carry out the administration of justice in a simple, fast and low cost manner and as an effort to increase access to justice. has issued Supreme Court Regulation (PerMA) number 3 of 2022 concerning electronic mediation in court. The purpose of writing this article is to determine the effectiveness of electronic mediation in resolving divorce cases at the Tanjungbalai Religious Court using empirical methods, namely research carried out directly or field observations. This research model comes from social science to research social problems and phenomena. This research was conducted at the Tanjungbalai Religious Court, North Sumatra Province. The conclusion of this research is that mediation of divorce cases at the Tanjungbalai Religious Court which is carried out electronically is not yet effective because it is not in accordance with the intent of the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation concerning Mediation Procedures in court which is carried out using electronic media in accordance with PerMA number 3 of 2022. This is influenced by by several factors including internal and external factorsKeywords: Electronic Mediation; Religious courts; Divorce
IMPLEMENTASI KEADILAN RESTORATIF DI SATUAN LALU LINTAS POLRES ASAHAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS Suriani Suriani; Mayzura Mayzura
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): August 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i3.4145

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to determine the regulations for resolving traffic accident cases using a restorative justice approach and the legal certainty of resolving traffic accident cases using a restorative justice approach. This type of research uses empirical legal research, namely research conducted directly or by field observation. Regulations for resolving traffic accident cases using a restorative justice approach are regulated in Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning Case Handling Based on Restorative Justice. The settlement stages include inviting a meeting between the parties, a desire for peace, drafting a Peace Agreement Deed, and approval of the Peace Agreement Deed by Police Investigators. Legal certainty in resolving traffic accident cases using a restorative justice approach encompasses several aspects, namely a clear and transparent legal process, protection of the rights of victims and perpetrators, the application of restorative justice as an alternative, and the role of the police as a facilitator. Keywords: Restorative justice; Police; Traffic Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui pengaturan penyelesaian perkara kecelakaan lalu lintas dengan pendekatan keadilan restorative dan kepastian hukum terhadap penyelesaian perkara kecelakaan lalu lintas dengan pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif. Jenis penelitian ini menggunakan Penelitian hukum empiris yaitu penelitian yang dilakukan secara langsung atau observasi ke lapangan. Pengaturan penyelesaian perkara kecelakaan lalu lintas dengan pendekatan keadilan restorative diatur dalam Peraturan Kepolisian Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Perkara Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. Adapun tahap penyelesaian dengan mengundang pertemuan antar pihak, adanya keinginan berdamai, membuat Akta Kesepakatan Perdamaian dan Persetujuan Akta Kesepakatan Perdamaian oleh Penyidik Kepolisian. Kepastian hukum terhadap penyelesaian perkara kecelakaan lalu lintas dengan pendekatan keadilan restorative mencakup beberapa aspek yaitu proses hukum yang jelas dan transparan, perlindungan hak korban dan pelaku, penerapan keadilan restoratif sebagai Alternatif dan peran Kepolisian sebagai Fasilitator. Kata kunci: Keadilan restoratif; Kepolisian; Lalu lintas
IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2024 TENTANG PEDOMAN MENGADILI PERKARA PIDANA BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF Suriani Suriani; Mhd. Azhari Efendi
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol. 8 No. 4 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v8i4.4925

Abstract

Abstract: Restorative justice is a new approach to the criminal justice system that prioritizes the principle of restoration over retribution. Unlike conventional approaches that focus on punishing the perpetrator, restorative justice emphasizes dialogue, reparation, and the creation of consensus between the perpetrator, victim, and community. This approach is considered more humane and capable of providing equitable solutions for all parties. Supreme Court Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2024 was issued in response to the need for official guidelines for judges in applying restorative justice principles. The introduction of this Supreme Court Regulation represents a strategic step in encouraging a paradigm shift in criminal law that focuses not only on the perpetrator but also considers the rights and interests of victims. The Tanjungbalai District Court is one of the courts that has begun implementing this Supreme Court Regulation. However, implementation in the field has not always been smooth. Various obstacles arise from regulations, lack of understanding of officials, limited resources, and resistance from the legal community itself. Therefore, an in-depth study is needed to determine the extent to which this Supreme Court Regulation is being implemented and the obstacles faced by the Tanjungbalai District Court. Keyword: Restorative Justice; Criminal Cases; Courts Abstrak: Keadilan restoratif merupakan pendekatan baru dalam sistem peradilan pidana yang mengedepankan prinsip pemulihan (restorasi) dibanding pembalasan (retribusi). Berbeda dari pendekatan konvensional yang berorientasi pada pemberian hukuman terhadap pelaku, keadilan restoratif lebih menekankan pada proses dialog, pemulihan kerugian, dan penciptaan kesepakatan antara pelaku, korban, dan masyarakat. Pendekatan ini dianggap lebih humanis dan mampu memberikan solusi yang berkeadilan bagi semua pihak. Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 lahir sebagai respon terhadap kebutuhan akan pedoman resmi bagi hakim dalam menerapkan prinsip keadilan restoratif. Kehadiran Peraturan Mahkamah Agung ini menjadi langkah strategis dalam mendorong transformasi paradigma hukum pidana yang tidak hanya berfokus pada pelaku, melainkan juga memperhatikan hak-hak dan kepentingan korban. Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungbalai menjadi salah satu pengadilan yang telah mulai mengimplementasikan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung ini. Namun demikian, penerapan di lapangan tidak selalu berjalan lancar. Terdapat berbagai hambatan baik dari segi regulasi, pemahaman aparat, keterbatasan sarana, hingga resistensi dari masyarakat hukum itu sendiri. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kajian mendalam mengenai sejauh mana Peraturan Mahkamah Agung ini diterapkan dan bagaimana kendala yang dihadapi oleh Pengadilan Negeri Tanjungbalai. Kata kunci: Keadilan Restoratif; Perkara Pidana; Pengadilan. 
Co-Authors Aldi Ardiansyah Siagian Andriani Andriani Annisa Luthfia Arum Tsabitah S Chairanda Al Azmi Chandra Ridho Wijaya Cici Rahma Alia Dany Try Hutama Hutabarat Debby Pratiwi Surbakti Deviana Dewi Sirait Dey Wahdira Diana Stephany Br. Tamba Emmi Rahmiwita Nasution Gusthi Sulistio Al Fath Hikmah Ramadhani Ilham Tantowi Imam Ramadhan Imelda Mardayanti Irda Pratiwi Irma Sari Iskandar Hadinata Ismail Ismail Ismail Junindra Martua Khairunnisak Panjaitan Lili Kahirina Azhari Lubi M. Hafiz Nurhasan Sihombing Maria Valentina Sinaga Mayzura Mayzura Mhd. Azhari Efendi Muhammad Aldi Prayuda Sitorus Muhammad Fatwa Sitorus Muhammad Idham Muhammad Perdana Syah Nadia Aulya Putri Neil Falah Hadi Putri Julia Nabila Putri Putri Rienda Syuhaila Rumanty Valentina Sitorus Rumondang Rumondang Salim Fauzi Lubis Siti Hajar Siregar Sri Diana Windi Septiani Manurung