Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.633
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Indonesia Medicus Veterinus IJTIHAD Dusturiah : Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial SAMARAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN COMPARATIVE OF SYARIAH LAW PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam CENDEKIA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan MAQASIDI As-Siyadah: Jurnal Politik dan Hukum Tata Negara Tasyri' Journal of Innovative and Creativity Al-Mudharabah
Azmil Umur, Azmil
Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan, Universitas Udayana
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 19 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM

 1 
EFEKTIVITAS PENYELESIAN SENGKETA ADAT MELALUI PERADILAN ADAT: STUDI DI DESA LAWE SEMPILANG KECAMATAN LAWE ALAS KABUPATEN ACEH TENGGARA Purnama, Ebi; Syuib, Muhammad; Umur, Azmil
PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Vol 13 No 1 (2025): PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Kapuas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51826/perahu.v13i1.1344

Abstract

This article examines the authority and effectiveness of customary courts as a form of alternative dispute resolution, using a case study in Lawe Sempilang Village, Southeast Aceh. Customary courts serve indigenous communities in resolving both civil and criminal disputes based on local norms. Although accepted by the community, their decisions lack binding legal force and may be challenged through formal judicial processes. Using an empirical juridical approach, the research analyzes data collected through interviews, observation, and document review. The findings indicate that customary courts are effective when the imposed sanctions—such as fines or compensation—are respected by the offender. However, if non-compliance occurs, the aggrieved party may seek recourse through state legal institutions. This study underscores the importance of formal recognition and legal mechanisms to enforce customary decisions and suggests better integration between customary and state justice systems to enhance access to culturally responsive legal remedies.
Co-Authors Ainal Mardhiah Armiadi Musa Bukhari Ali Dedy Sumardi Edi Yuhermansyah EMK Alidar, EMK Faiqah, Razita Fathullah, Muhammad Hasnul Arifin Melayu Hayati Hayati Iwan Harjono Utama Jiyadi, Mufid Misran Muhammad Maulana Muhammad Zikri Mutiara Fahmi Ningsih, Mutia Martuna Nurhaliza, Intan Nurvira, Khairatun Aini Purnama, Ebi Raumizah, Raumizah Rispalman Rispalman Rizky, Muhammad Fathur Sahfitri Saraan, Lia Saiful Saiful Sakrina, Cut Putri Sri Kayati Widyastuti Surbakti, Husnatul Suriana Suriana Syuib, Muhammad Yuhermasyah, Edi Zubaidi , Zaiyad