Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

The Problem of Neutrality of the State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in the 2020 Regional Head Election Atmojo, Muhammad Eko; Sulaksono, Tunjung; Hanif, Nita Ariba; Fridayani, Helen Dian
ARISTO Vol 11 No 2 (2023): July
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ars.v11i2.6101

Abstract

This article will discuss the neutrality of bureaucracy in Indonesia with the perspective of data collection from online media. Where the purpose of this paper is to find out the involvement of ASN in the power struggle in the implementation of regional head elections. If we look at the many cases of neutrality violations that occurred in the 2020 regional head elections, this is also justified by the State Civil Affairs Commission which records cases of violations of bureaucratic neutrality. The implementation of regional head elections conducted in 2020 is indeed full of pros and cons, besides that almost every regional head election always arises the issue of bureaucratic neutrality. In 2020, there were 694 ASNs who committed violations and have been reported to the State Civil Apparatus Commission. This shows that the implementation of regional head elections is one of the momentums for candidates for regional heads and ASNs to conduct patron-client practices. In addition, the implementation of regional head elections is also carried out during the covid-19 pandemic so that it is possible to have ASN involvement in the implementation of campaigns and so on. Because in 2020 there is a lot of involvement of civil apparatus that shows open support to one of the candidates.
E-Voting Inclusivity: The Accessibility of Elderly Voters in the 2021 Village Head Election in Sleman Regency Fadilla, Tiara; Sulaksono, Tunjung
ARISTO Vol 12 No 1 (2024): Januari
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24269/ars.v12i1.7627

Abstract

The Village Head Election (Pilkades) is a forum for the community to use their voting rights to elect leaders at the village level. It utilizes technology as a tool to accelerate and influence the technicalities of village head elections from conventional to digital through electronic voting (e-voting). This research aims to analyze the accessibility of elderly voters in the Village Head Election in Sleman Regency, Special Region Province of Yogyakarta (DIY). This research was examined using Thomas and Penchansky's theory which consists of indicators of availability, accessibility and accommodation. This research was a qualitative type of research with data collection techniques using primary data, obtained from interviews, and secondary data, obtained from journal articles and other literature studies in the form of research-related documents. The results of this research show that the Sleman Regency’s Community Empowerment Service and the Village Government were the parties that provide facilities and infrastructure to the community in the village head election in Sleman Regency. In accommodating this, initially, the political dynamics in Sleman Regency were more apathetic and traditional for the elderly people due to the change of the era. However, after researching, the problems that arose during the election were more related to the technical aspects of e-voting rather than the community or elderly people. Several obstacles occurred during e-voting, making the voters annoyed. Then, the elderly voters were given the same services as the other voters, except for the elderly with limitations. In this case, indicators such as availability, accessibility, and accommodation are considered appropriate and sufficient for the needs of elderly people. Regarding these needs, the TTU (the main technical team) and TTL (the field technical team) try their best to fulfill whatever it is without discrimination.
WORKSHOP ADVOKASI BAGI KADER MUHAMMADIYAH DALAM MENDORONG KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK YANG BERKEADILAN Lailam, Tanto; Sulaksono, Tunjung; Saleh, Indah Nur Shanty
JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Vol 9, No 6 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31764/jmm.v9i6.33558

Abstract

Abstrak: Program pengabdian ini memfokuskan pada penguatan kemampuan advokasi bagi kader Muhammadiyah dalam mendorong kebijakan publik yang berkeadilan. Urgensi penguatan ini dilatarbelakangi banyaknya kebijakan publik di daerah yang menyimpang dari peraturan perundang-undangan. Tujuannya untuk memperkuat kemampuan kader dalam melakukan advokasi kebijakan publik, selain itu mempertegas komitmen dan sinergitas kader dalam mendorong kebijakan publik yang berpihak terhadap umat dan bangsa. Metode pengabdian dilakukan dengan musyawarah, realisasi program, dan evaluasi dengan mitra pengabdian Lembaga Hikmah dan Kebijakan Publik Pimpinan Pusat Muhammadiyah. Pelaksanaan dengan menggunakan metode workshop dengan jumlah peserta yang hadir sebanyak 42 kader pada pimpinan wilayah dan daerah Muhammadiyah se-Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Metode evaluasi hasil dengan meminta tanggapan dan penilaian perwakilan peserta dari 7 utusan lembaga, hasil nilai rata-rata adalah 83, 57% dengan kriteria bahwa workshop advokasi kebijakan publik berdampak pada peningkatan nalar kritis kader terhadap persoalan politik kebangsaan. Selain itu, program tersebut sudah sesuai dengan persoalan dan isu-isu strategis bidang advokasi kebijakan publik di daerah.Abstract: This community service programme aims to strengthen the advocacy skills of Muhammadiyah cadres to promote equitable public policies. This is motivated by the large number of public policies in the region that deviate from the law. The programme aims to enhance the ability of cadres to advocate for public policies and reinforce their commitment to promoting policies that benefit the people and the nation. The community service method involved deliberation, programme implementation and evaluation in collaboration with the community service partner, the Department of Politics and Public Policy of Muhammadiyah. A workshop method was used for the implementation, with 42 cadres from the regional and district leaderships of Muhammadiyah in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province in attendance. The results were evaluated by requesting feedback and assessments from seven institutional delegates, who were participants. The average score was 83.57%, indicating that the public policy advocacy workshop had impacted cadres' critical thinking on national political issues. Additionally, the programme addressed the strategic issues and problems in the field of public policy advocacy in the region.