Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Law Development Journal

Juridical Analysis on Cabinet Structure Changes of Prabowo’s Government & The Impact to The New Government Limbong, Andrew Afrizal; Simamora, Janpatar; Sihotang, Januari
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 1 (2025): March 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.1.39-51

Abstract

The cabinet structure is one of the important instruments in government, because it determines the pattern of executive work and the implementation of public policy, so that the formation of the cabinet is the president's first step in realizing his vision and mission through several selected people who will be part of his government cabinet. This study aims to analyze the juridical aspects of changes in the cabinet structure of President Prabowo's administration and its impact on governance in Indonesia using normative juridical research methods with a statutory approach. The results show that changes in the cabinet structure by President Prabowo are the prerogative of the President as stipulated in Article 4 paragraph (1) and Article 17 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and Article 15 of Law No. 61 of 2024 concerning Amendments to Law No. 39 of 2008 concerning State Ministries. In terms of impact, changes in the cabinet structure have major implications for governance, especially on the efficiency of governance, where these changes can have a positive impact or even a negative impact depending on the work of each institution in the cabinet formed by President Prabowo.
The Role of the Medan City Legal Aid Institute in Providing Pro Bono Legal Aid to the Community Martua Nainggolan, Yedija; Simamora, Janpatar; Sihotang, Januari
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.1.36-52

Abstract

This study examines the role of the Legal Aid Institute (LBH) in Medan in providing free legal services to low-income communities. This service aligns with Law Number 16 of 2011 concerning Legal Aid, which emphasizes the importance of access to justice for those who utilize these services. However, the lack of public understanding and information about LBH is a major obstacle. The approach used in this study is a normative juridical approach coupled with an empirical approach, which includes regulatory analysis and interviews with various stakeholders. The results of this study indicate that LBH in Medan plays a crucial role in supporting the community through both litigation and non- litigation processes. Some challenges faced include limited workforce, low public awareness, and inadequate government support. Therefore, collaboration between the government, the community, and LBH is crucial to improve the effectiveness of free services for communities in need.
Legal Analysis of Criminal Liability of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) for Land Document Engineering (Study of West Jakarta District Court Decision Number 248/Pid.B/2022) Debataraja, Rahmat Tri Andika; Simamora, Janpatar; Sihotang, Januari
Law Development Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2026): March 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.8.1.85-95

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the criminal liability of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) in the fabrication of land documents as well as the supervision and prevention efforts based on the West Jakarta District Court Decision Number 248/Pid.B/2022. The issues studied include the form of criminal liability of PPAT involved in falsification or manipulation of land documents and the effectiveness of the supervision mechanism by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a case approach, and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that PPAT can be held criminally responsible if proven to have intentionally participated in the act of authentic deeds. In addition, administrative supervision of PPAT still faces various obstacles, so it is necessary to strengthen the supervision system, increase professionalism, and enforce strict sanctions to prevent the recurrence of the practice of fabricating land documents.