Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.554
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Eco-Entrepreneur Teosofia: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Mysticism JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Unes Law Review Equals : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Al-Azkiya : Jurnal Pendidikan MI/SD Tatsqifiy: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Hamalatul Qur'an : Jurnal Ilmu Ilmu Al-Qur'an Jurnal Ilmiah Swara MaNajemen (Swara Mahasiswa Manajemen) Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Media of Health Research
Ahmad Rizki, Ahmad
Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal)

 1 
ANALISIS DAYA PEMBEDA BUTIR TES PILIHAN GANDA MATERI PERSAMAAN TRIGONOMETRI BERDASARKAN TEORI TES KLASIK Rizki, Ahmad; Halini, Halini; Indriani, Tari
JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Vol 7 No 2 (2024): JURNAL MathEdu (Mathematic Education Journal) Juli 2024
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37081/mathedu.v7i2.5961

Abstract

This study aims to measure the distinguishing power of the multiple-choice form test items of class XI trigonometric equation material at SMA Mujahidin Pontianak. The object analyzed is 40 items of multiple-choice questions of trigonometric equation material. The type of research used is descriptive quantitative. The data collection method is a documentation method and the data obtained in the form of secondary data is then analyzed using a classical test theory approach. The results of the analysis showed that as many as 7 questions or 20.59% had bad distinguishing power criteria, 16 questions or 47.06% had sufficient discriminating power, 10 questions or 29.41% had good discriminating power criteria, 1 question or 2.94% had bad discriminating power, and no questions or as many as 0% had very good discriminating power. From the overall data, it can be concluded that the test items have a differentiating power that meets the feasible criteria because most of the questions have sufficient criteria.
Co-Authors Aang Saeful Milah Ahmad Yani T Bambang Sudarsono Chen, Mei Ling Daffa, Muhammad Fachry Abda El Rahman Hadi Prayitno, Hadi Halini - Indriani, Tari Istiadah Jaisy, Ghozi Latifah , Wanda Lestari, Meli Meldi, Nadya Febriani Melia Mustafidin, Ahmad Nasichah Rahman Harahap, Abd Rija, Muhammad Rusdi, Hasan Sabila, Finanta Diva Sri Wahyuni Tura, Theobaldus Boro Wahyunengsih, Wahyunengsih