Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan
Muharrir Muharrir
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Teuku Umar
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Penyelesaian Sengketa oleh Majelis Adat Setikar Kampung di Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang dan Kedudukannya dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia Jefrie Maulana; Muharrir Muharrir; Muhammad Nahyan Zulfikar
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 6, No 2 (2022): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v6i2.6210

Abstract

Settlement of disputes between residents in Aceh Tamiang Regency was organized by the Setikar Village Council (MDSK) as a village deliberation body, which was later better known by the community through mediation through village traditional apparatus. This study aims to find out and explain how the procedures for resolving disputes between communities by MDSK, and analyze the legal certainty of dispute resolution between communities by MDSK in the Indonesian Judicial system. The research method of this study is normative juridical research by examining aspects of legal certainty in dispute resolution by the Aceh Tamiang District MDSK in the Indonesian justice system. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The approach taken in this research is the approach to legislation and the approach to the principle of legal certainty. The research data will be analyzed qualitatively in accordance with the legislation and conformity with the principle of legal certainty. The results of the study indicate that out-of-court dispute resolution in Aceh Tamiang District is organized by MDSK. The dispute resolution process is carried out by examining initial data related to the subject of the dispute, examining documentary evidence and adjusting it in the field, then making decisions by deliberation and consensus. Dispute resolution by MDSK has not met the principle of legal certainty. Because, MDSK does not have legality as a mediation forum and is not recognized as a mediator as regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Court. Then, there are no implementing regulations in the form of guidelines for dispute resolution through MDSK, standard rules for implementation procedures and dispute resolution procedures. 
Alih Pengetahuan Tenaga Kerja Asing (Tka) di Indonesia (Ditinjau dari Aspek Regulasi dan Kebijakannya) Muhammad Nahyan Zulfikar; Basri Basri; Jefrie Maulana; Muharrir Muharrir
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 1 (2023): April
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v7i1.6958

Abstract

Arrangements for Foreign Workers are regulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower which is basically intended for certain jobs or positions that cannot be occupied by local workers and to accelerate the human development index (HDI) needed to support and improve field competence for local Indonesian workers through Knowledge Transfer and Technology or which is often referred to as the transfer of knowledge and technology by means of transferring skills from foreign workers to local workers through their field education and training, in terms of accepting foreign workers in Indonesia, this cannot be separated from the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS)/ WTO as the rules of the WTO game that wants policies without discrimination in all aspects. This study uses the juridical-normative legal research method. As for the Juridical-Normative approach, it uses all the methods and techniques that are often used in legal research studies, namely through a statutory approach (statute approach, case approach) to see cases of the entry of Foreign Workers in Indonesian, a comparative approach to compare regulations between one country and another and the last approach, namely, a conceptual approach in the form of views that can be elaborated in solving the issues faced by foreign workers at this time. However, Indonesia must also be careful in observing WTO rules by looking at the GAST/WTO Provisions concerning the natural movement of persons. It also needs to be adopted in the policy of placing foreign workers by taking into account experience and its application in other countries in the interest of protecting Indonesian workers and not using services. foreign workers who do not have good work skills.
Kekuatan Hukum Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2023 tentang Petunjuk Bagi Hakim dalam Mengadili Perkara Permohonan Pencatatan Perkawinan Antar-Umat yang Berbeda Agama dan Kepercayaan Muharrir, Muharrir; Maulana, Jefrie; Zulfikar, Muhammad Nahyan
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v7i1.8462

Abstract

The issuance of Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 2 of 2023 concerning Instructions for Judges in Adjudicating Cases on Applications for Registration of Marriages Between People of Different Religions and Beliefs has caused pros and cons reactions in society, in essence in this SEMA applications for registration of marriages between different religions cannot be granted by the Court, this is of course contrary to Supreme Court Decision Number 1400 K/Pdt/1986 which states that differences in the religion of prospective husband and wife are not prohibited in marriage, and also contradicts the content in the Elucidation of Article 35 letter a of Law Number 23, 2006 concerning Population Administration, where it is explained that the Court can determine marriages between people of different religions. This research aims to determine the position and legal strength of SEMA in the hierarchical system of statutory regulations. This research method uses normative juridical with a statutory approach. The research results show that the position of SEMA Number 2 of 2023 is under the law and its legal force cannot erase or revoke articles in the Population Administration law, even though SEMA Number 2 of 2023 contains the same material as Article 2 paragraph (1 ) and Article 8 letter f of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, but can only revoke legal products issued by the Supreme Court, so with the issuance of SEMA this automatically revokes Supreme Court Decision Number 1400 K/Pdt/1986. The binding legal power of SEMA is not directly legally binding, but contains legal relevance aimed at the Judicial body under the Supreme Court, thus closing the door for the Court to grant Applications for Registration of Interfaith marriage.
Co-Authors Basri Basri Jefrie Maulana Muhammad Nahyan Zulfikar