Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.601
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Widya Yuridika JOURNAL EQUITABLE Jurnal Ilmu Hukum The Juris Unes Law Review Jurnal Simbur Cahaya University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Universitas Al Azhar Indonesia JUSTISI SIGn Jurnal Hukum KRTHA BHAYANGKARA JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Paulus Law Journal Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis SUPREMASI Jurnal Hukum Jurnal hukum IUS PUBLICUM RIO LAW JURNAL Proceedings Series on Social Sciences & Humanities Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Alethea Jurnal Hukum Sehasen Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum Perspektif Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Bacarita Law Journal Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Kertha Patrika Open Access DRIVERset
Mardian Putra Frans
Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana
Arts Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 53 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Building a Fair Criminal Justice System: The Urgency of a Single Prosecution System for Prosecutors and Police Alma Aulia Shafa Purbowo; Rafel Nanda Purnomo; Mardian Putra Frans
Kertha Patrika Vol. 47 No. 3 (2025): Reinterpreted Civil, Administrative, and Criminal Law into Indonesia Legal Dev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2025.v47.i03.p07

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces complex challenges in coordination and effectiveness of law enforcement, particularly between the police and the prosecutor's office. The dualism of investigative authority that has existed for some time has given rise to various structural problems, resulting in legal uncertainty and reducing the quality of criminal law enforcement. This study focuses on analyzing the urgency of implementing a Single Prosecution System as a reformative solution in building a more equitable and effective criminal justice system. The concept of a Single Prosecution System is of particular concern because in the practice of law enforcement in Indonesia, there is still a division of dual authority, where prosecutors and the police both have the authority to investigate certain cases such as corruption and gross human rights violations. This condition often leads to unclear tasks between institutions, weak coordination, and overlapping authorities, which result in inconsistencies in the handling of criminal cases. The purpose of this study is to identify the weaknesses of the current criminal justice system and analyze how the implementation of the Single Prosecution System can be a solution to create an integrated, effective, and fair criminal justice system. This study uses a legal-normative approach with secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that reforming the criminal justice system through the implementation of a Single Prosecution System can eliminate overlapping authority between prosecutors and the police, strengthen institutional coordination, and create an Indonesian criminal justice system that guarantees legal certainty and justice for the community.
Building a Fair Criminal Justice System: The Urgency of a Single Prosecution System for Prosecutors and Police Alma Aulia Shafa Purbowo; Rafel Nanda Purnomo; Mardian Putra Frans
Kertha Patrika Vol. 47 No. 3 (2025): Reinterpreted Civil, Administrative, and Criminal Law into Indonesia Legal Dev
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Udayana University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KP.2025.v47.i03.p07

Abstract

The Indonesian criminal justice system faces complex challenges in coordination and effectiveness of law enforcement, particularly between the police and the prosecutor's office. The dualism of investigative authority that has existed for some time has given rise to various structural problems, resulting in legal uncertainty and reducing the quality of criminal law enforcement. This study focuses on analyzing the urgency of implementing a Single Prosecution System as a reformative solution in building a more equitable and effective criminal justice system. The concept of a Single Prosecution System is of particular concern because in the practice of law enforcement in Indonesia, there is still a division of dual authority, where prosecutors and the police both have the authority to investigate certain cases such as corruption and gross human rights violations. This condition often leads to unclear tasks between institutions, weak coordination, and overlapping authorities, which result in inconsistencies in the handling of criminal cases. The purpose of this study is to identify the weaknesses of the current criminal justice system and analyze how the implementation of the Single Prosecution System can be a solution to create an integrated, effective, and fair criminal justice system. This study uses a legal-normative approach with secondary data consisting of primary and secondary legal materials. Data analysis was conducted qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that reforming the criminal justice system through the implementation of a Single Prosecution System can eliminate overlapping authority between prosecutors and the police, strengthen institutional coordination, and create an Indonesian criminal justice system that guarantees legal certainty and justice for the community.
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bank Sebagai Pengguna Artificial Intelligence Mardian Putra Frans; Agustina Indah Intan Sari; Krismelia Y Panji; Yudhistira Buana Cipta Ismara
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 2 (2024): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i2.9026

Abstract

 The purpose of the research is to study and analyze the issue of the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by banks that results in losses to customers. To respond to the issue, this paper argues that banks as AI users should be held criminally liable despite the lack of mens rea in banks as corporations which are legal entities. For this reason, this paper uses the identification theory as an analytical tool for bank criminal liability. The issue is compiled on the results of normative legal research with a statute approach and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that based on the identification theory, the bank as an AI user can be held criminally liable with the public prosecutor must identify the person who committed the criminal act (actus reus) is the management as the controlling personnel (directing mind or controlling mind). The location of the AI mens rea is in the approval of the corporate controller to use AI, meaning that the approval is interpreted as the inner attitude of the controller to accept the risks arising from the use of AI. Tujuan dari penelitian untuk menganalisis isu penggunaan artificial intelligence (AI) oleh bank yang berakibat pada kerugian bagi nasabah. Untuk menanggapi isu tersebut, tulisan ini berpendapat bahwa bank sebagai pengguna AI patut dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana meskipun tidak mempunyai mens rea pada bank sebagai korporasi yang merupakan badan hukum. Untuk itu, tulisan ini menggunakan teori identifikasi sebagai pisau analisis terhadap pertanggungjawaban pidana bank. Isu tersebut disusun atas hasil penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil penelitian menunjukan, berdasarkan teori identifikasi, bank sebagai pengguna AI dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana dengan penuntut umum harus mengidentifikasi yang melakuan perbuatan pidana (actus reus) adalah pengurus sebagai personil pengendali (directing mind atau controlling mind). Letak mens rea AI ada pada persetujuan pengendali korporasi menggunakan AI, artinya sikao persetujuan tersebit dimaknai sebagai sikap batin pengali untuk menerima resiko yang timbul akibat penggunaai AI.  
Co-Authors -, M.Haryanto - Ade Tesalonika Tobing Agris Bagus Puta Pratama Agustina Indah Intan Sari Alfret Alfret, Alfret Alma Aulia Shafa Purbowo Amanda Vala Batara Rundu Padang Arthur Octivano Ruswandi Arthur Octivano Ruswandi Burhanudin, Krisna Christopher, Matthew Dayanti, Karisma Christiyana Putri Dewangga, Stevanus Andrian Dewi Andika Permatasari Djaga Mesa, Grendhard Dwi Pramudyani Edgard Naba Rivalio Edgard Naba Rivalio Eldillon, Iddo Febriansyah, Yoga Felix Simeone, Nicholas Gerard Gabriel Halsa Arifin Galang Satrio Nugroho Gita Kezia Pretty Br Bangun Gita Rismawati Grand Pilar Sinukaban, Chalxhes Gregorius Septa Widiartana Intan Sari, Agustina Indah Ismara, Yudhistira Buana Cipta Karosekali, Timothy Christian Randal Krismelia Y Panji Kynan Raffael Daud Martha Claudya Pattiasina Matthew Sharif Mochamad Rayhan Zendy Fariz Muh Haryanto Nazara, Imanuel Ndruru, Grace Nimerodi Gulo Obidje, Teddy San George Oktaviani, Ismi Opit, Syaloomita Electra Paembonan, Destri Anel Permatasari, Dewi Andika Priscilia Putri Embong Rosari Rafel Nanda Purnomo Royhan Fakhri Megantara Sari, Agustina Indah Intan Sharif, Matthew Sharon Angelia Siahaan, Vania Romasta Simeone, Nicholas Gerard Felix Syahputra, Rivaldi Hendy Utami, Setiani Budi Utomo, Eko Fitra Vito Oktovianus Maupiku Warumboy, Charolin Khristy Winda, Darisa Yudhistira Buana Cipta Ismara