I Dewa Gede Rat Dwiyana Putra
Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Published : 33 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching

Forms and Functions of Foreign Language Centres in Indonesian Higher Education Institutions Kaslan, Iswandany; Karim, Sayit Abdul; Dwiyana Putra, I Dewa Gede Rat
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Vol 13, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/jollt.v13i2.13889

Abstract

This research investigates language centres within Indonesia’s higher education institutions, aiming to examine their forms, functions, and the challenges they face. Drawing on responses from 109 participants across 14 universities, the study highlights the legal basis of their establishment, with most centres relying on rector-issued regulations. The management structure emphasizes the central role of the Head of Language Centre, responsible for both administrative coordination and academic leadership. Findings reveal a broad range of language services, with Indonesian and English as core languages, supported by various regional and international languages. Educational functions feature prominently, including language training and certification. Language centres also contribute to research by managing language-related data and serve as key hubs for community service, extending their impact beyond the university setting. However, several challenges persist, including limited infrastructure and funding, repetitive programming, and human resource limitations. Future research should expand institutional coverage, apply diverse methodologies, and examine the influence of technological developments. To strengthen the strategic role of language centres, policymakers are encouraged to implement a standardized classification and accreditation system based on their varied forms and functions. Such a framework would promote quality assurance, institutional accountability, and allow universities to leverage accredited centres for academic advancement and eligibility for government-existing research grant schemes.
Forms and Functions of Foreign Language Centres in Indonesian Higher Education Institutions Kaslan, Iswandany; Karim, Sayit Abdul; Dwiyana Putra, I Dewa Gede Rat
Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/jollt.v13i2.13889

Abstract

This research investigates language centres within Indonesia’s higher education institutions, aiming to examine their forms, functions, and the challenges they face. Drawing on responses from 109 participants across 14 universities, the study highlights the legal basis of their establishment, with most centres relying on rector-issued regulations. The management structure emphasizes the central role of the Head of Language Centre, responsible for both administrative coordination and academic leadership. Findings reveal a broad range of language services, with Indonesian and English as core languages, supported by various regional and international languages. Educational functions feature prominently, including language training and certification. Language centres also contribute to research by managing language-related data and serve as key hubs for community service, extending their impact beyond the university setting. However, several challenges persist, including limited infrastructure and funding, repetitive programming, and human resource limitations. Future research should expand institutional coverage, apply diverse methodologies, and examine the influence of technological developments. To strengthen the strategic role of language centres, policymakers are encouraged to implement a standardized classification and accreditation system based on their varied forms and functions. Such a framework would promote quality assurance, institutional accountability, and allow universities to leverage accredited centres for academic advancement and eligibility for government-existing research grant schemes.
The Effects of Pair Collaboration and Self-Efficacy on EFL College Students’ Writing Quality Putra, I Dewa Gede Rat Dwiyana; Saukah, Ali; Basthomi, Yazid; Astuti, Utari Praba; Suharja, Anggi Auliyani
JOLLT Journal of Languages and Language Teaching Vol. 14 No. 2 (2026): April
Publisher : Universitas Pendidikan Mandalika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33394/jollt.v14i2.15483

Abstract

Pair collaboration might contribute to students’ writing quality, but that effect might differ across students with different levels of writing self-efficacy. This study aimed to explain how different kinds of writing self-efficacy-based pair formations affect the students’ writing quality in the aspect of content, organization, and language use. The participants in this study were college students majoring in English language teaching (N= 135). This experimental study consisted of three phases, where in each phase, different combinations of comparison were investigated through counter-balanced experimental design. The main inferential statistical analysis employed in this study were including Two-way repeated measure ANOVA, Friedman’s ANOVA and Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test to provide evidences on the simple effect of the comparisons. The findings showed that: first, students who write collaboratively in a homogeneous pair produce a significantly better writing quality than those who write individually regardless of their writing self-efficacy level. Second, high levels of self-efficacy students writing individually produce better writing quality than heterogeneous (high-low) pairs. Third, homogeneous pairs of high self-efficacy students outperformed heterogeneous pairs in terms of their writing quality.  These findings implied that heterogeneous pairs are recommended for learning purposes. However, homogenous pairs are recommended for assessment to minimize evaluation errors. Consequently, these results advocate for a differentiated pedagogical approach where instructors strategically shift from heterogeneous "growth-oriented" scaffolding during writing instructions to homogeneous "performance-oriented" grouping for summative tasks, ensuring that individual accountability is preserved without stifling the social benefits of peer collaboration.