Articles
<![CDATA[Granting assimilation and integration rights to prisoners (adults and children) in the center of the pandemic Covid-19 ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Nuh]]>;
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[Nowadays the community is not only researched by the spread of Corona viruses, but the public must also be introof from crime action. Crime phenomenon amid pandemic conditions, the culprit is mostly an inmate who get an assimilation program. The assimilation Program itself is issued by the Government through the Ministry of Justice and Human rights. How not worried, the policy precisely raises the middle of the community, in the current conditions that are panicked with social insecurity. This is due to lack of supervision from the manager of the prison in the assimilation program so that many inmates who are not well qualified can get assimilation program, then the current economic conditions that carut-marut amid the pandemic Corona virus or Covid-19, unemployment is a lot, life is difficult so that the potential criminologinya very large. Then no wonder a number of prisoners are revisit. Based on the background above, this proposal can be formulated as follows: 1. is the granting of assimilation and integration rights to the convicts (adult and child) in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic already in accordance with the legislation? 2. Is it necessary to add new rules governing assimilation and integration rights in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic? A) This research aims to know and analyze from the side of regulation, especially Permenkumham No. 10 year 2020 on the release of convicts and children in the middle of the Covid-19 pandemic, in order to prevent the transmission of Covid-19 in correctional institution. B) The second purpose of the study is to know and analyze the government needs to issue specific regulations related to assimilation and integration rights in the midst of pandemic Covid-19.]]>
<![CDATA[Owner's Responsibility of Traffic Vehicles With E-Ticketing ]]>
<![CDATA[Fandy Firmansyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The e-ticket system or electronic ticketing has been piloted in several big cities. This electronic ticket, which is commonly called e-ticket, is a digitalization of the ticket process, by utilizing technology it is hoped that the entire ticketing process will be more efficient and effective and can also help the police in administrative management. However, in this e-ticket there are weaknesses as a result of which injustice arises. This study aims to determine whether the vehicle owner is responsible for violations committed by other parties and to find out what efforts the vehicle owner can make with E-Tilang. Based on the problems discussed in this thesis, the research method used is the legal research method with the statue approach and conceptual approach, the type of data uses primary legal material and secondary legal material, the data collection method used is through literature study and legal materials. The results of the study indicate that e-ticketing in the framework of criminal law is more focused on criminal responsibility and vehicle owners are not responsible for violations committed by other parties in the practice of implementing the Article in Law Number 22 Year 2009 concerning Traffic and Road Transportation. Efforts that can be made by vehicle owners are to protest to the police if the photo captured by CCTV is not him.]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSI ASAS SUBYEK TERITORIAL PADA PEMBERANTASAN KEJAHATAN SIBER ]]>
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 3 No 2 (2019): Volume 3 no.2, Oktober 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (109.4 KB)
|
DOI: 10.31090/hukumbisnis.v3i2.970
<![CDATA[Establishment and enactment of Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 11/2008 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions (Statute Book No. 58/2008, Supplement to Statute Book No. 4843, hereinafter abbreviated to Law No. 11/2008) and Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 19/16 concerning Amendment to Law Number I1 Year 2008 Regarding Information and Electronic Transactions (State Gazette Year 2016 Number 251, Supplement to State Gazette Number 5952, hereinafter abbreviated to Law No. 19/2016), is expected to be able to cope with cybercrime which is increasingly unsettling the public and guaranteeing certainty and use of cyberspace (cyber space) so that it can develop optimally. Provisions governing criminal jurisdiction can be seen in Article 2 and its explanation in Law No. 11/2008]]>
<![CDATA[KAJIAN YURIDIS PASAL 27 AYAT (1) UNDANG - UNDANG NO 11 TAHUN 2008 TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA SIBER KESUSILAAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS Vol 4 No 1 (2020): Vol.4 no.1 April 2020 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Narotama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31090/hukumbisnis.v4i1.1028
<![CDATA[The types of cyber crime are regulated in article 27 to article 37 of Law No. 11/2008 of Juncto Law No. 19/2016. The author is interested in analyzing the formulation of article 27 paragraph (1) regarding criminal acts of decency with his explanation in Law No. 11/2008 Juncto Law No. 19/2016, because the elements of a moral act in the formulation of article 27 paragraph (1) are unclear and can cause different perceptions. Regulations regarding the formulation of criminal acts in the law, in this case specifically the formulation of criminal acts in Law No. 11/2008 in conjunction with Law No. 19/2016 must be clear, easy to understand, and carried out fairly. Unclear criminal acts formulations can potentially lead to legal uncertainty. The author tries to reveal the unclear formulation of the provisions of article 27 paragraph (1) of Law No. 11/2008 which regulates the provisions on criminal acts of decency. This has become an urgent need and cannot be delayed, because it involves the issue of legal certainty. Key words: cyber crime, decency, legal certainty, article formulation, information technology]]>
<![CDATA[Written Approval for Commercialization of Portrai Photography: A Study of Law No. 28 of 2014 in the context of Improving the Distro Business in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ IJEBD (International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business Development) Vol 5 No 4 (2022): July 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM of NAROTAMA UNIVERSITY ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (199.769 KB)
|
DOI: 10.29138/ijebd.v5i4.1909
<![CDATA[Purpose: The purpose of this research is to examine the rules of written approval for the Commercialization of Portrait Photography as contained in Article 12 Paragraph (1) of the Copyright Law No. 28 of 2014 in the context of Improving the Distro Business in Indonesia. Design/methodology/approach: The type of legal research used is normative juridical research. The approach used in this research is the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. The sources of legal materials used in this doctrinal research consist of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The collected legal materials will be analyzed in a qualitative normative manner by reviewing, interpreting, and constructing statements contained in in-laws and regulations and other legal documents related to issues related to photo commercialization. Findings: Given the increasing competition in the business world, many creative business actors make their productions interesting, one of which is done by making t-shirts with portraits of artists and public figures obtained from the photographer who took the photo shoot. For example, example, a photographer takes a photo of an artist and uses it to line up his photo studio by making advertisements or billboards for the artist's portrait in his photo studio and has obtained permission from the artist, then the photographer sells the results of his work to the person, who by that person takes the portrait of the artist in the photo. fit on t-shirts to produce and sell. In this case, the photographer and the person who bought the photographer's portrait (portrait photography) violated copyright because the commercialization of portrait photography contained in the t-shirt was carried out without written permission from the person being photographed, while the regulation of portrait commercialization in Law No. 28 the year 2014 concerning Copyright, permission or approval of the person being photographed is only limited to commercialization for advertising and billboards, even though there are economic benefits that the t-shirt seller gets from the sale of the t-shirt and in fact, the t-shirt sells because the buyer bought the t-shirt because of the artist's portrait. in the shirt. Paper type: Research paper]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS BENTUK KEWAJIBAN ATAS PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PENAMBANGAN TANPA IZIN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 168/PID.SUS/2017/PN Pli ) ]]>
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>;
<![CDATA[Andre Abadi Santoso]]>
<![CDATA[ JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA (JSM) e-ISSN 2745-5955 | p-ISSN 2809-0543 Vol. 4 No. 1 (2023): Januari ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institut Penelitian dan Pengembangan Mandalika Indonesia (IP2MI) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.36312/ jomla.v4i1.1255
<![CDATA[Abstract: In mining behavior that does not have a permit, in essence it has fulfilled elements that can be threatened with criminal law as stipulated in the provisions of Article 158 Law Number 4 of 2009 concerning Mineral and Coal Mining. The problem in this research is how the form of criminal liability for business actors who carry out mining business without IUP, IPR, or IUPK in the case study of decision number 168/Pid.Sus/2017. The research method used is an analytical method used to collect data by means of a literature study. This type of research includes normative juridical research. That is, legal research materials were obtained qualitatively normatively. Based on all the legal facts, it was revealed that M. Riduan who committed the criminal act of mining without a business license could be asked for criminal liability or responsibility because he met the requirements to be held criminally responsible. Therefore, the Honorable Panel of Judges sentenced the defendant M. Riduan to 10 months in prison and a fine of Rp. 10,000,000,000 with a subsidiary of 2 months in prison. That the defendant has fulfilled all the requirements to be asked for criminal liability or responsibility, so the judge in imposing a sentence on the perpetrator of the criminal act of mining without a permit must consider mitigating and aggravating factors so that the sentence imposed is in accordance with the criminal act of the defendant.]]>
<![CDATA[URGENSITAS PEMBENTUKAN LEMBAGA PENYELENGGARAAN PELINDUNGAN DATA PRIBADI ]]>
<![CDATA[Rizky Pratama]]>;
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Gapenas Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.291
<![CDATA[Indonesia has experienced several data leaks in cyberspace. The government passed Law No.27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection as an effort to overcome this. In this law, the government will establish an institution that organizes the protection of personal data. The purpose of this study is to immediately establish a presidential regulation to regulate in detail the form of the Supervisory Institution for Personal Data Protection so that it can carry out its duties and authorities optimally. The research method used in this research is qualitative method. This research uses normative legal research or called doctrinal legal research. The approaches used are statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. (comparative approach). The results of this study explain that broadly speaking, the establishment of personal data protection organizers is an answer to the needs of the community to obtain personal data protection. personal data protection organizers can also be utilized by the community to complain or channel their aspirations related to personal data protection. Therefore, the ideal institution is independent]]>
<![CDATA[PENGURUSAN SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK TANAH RT 05-RW 05 GAYUNG KEBONSARI TIMUR KEC. KETINTANG KOTA SURABAYA ]]>
<![CDATA[suwardi suwardi]]>;
<![CDATA[Heru Kuswanto]]>;
<![CDATA[Evi Retnowulan]]>
<![CDATA[ UN PENMAS (Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat untuk Negeri) Vol 3 No 1 (2023): UN PENMAS Vol 3 No 1 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Narotama ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.29138/un-penmas.v3i1.2325
<![CDATA[Kesadaran masyarakat terhadap peraturan atau hukum sangatlah penting, selain untuk menjaga kepentingan individu atau kelompok juga menjamin terwujudanya kehidupan masyarakat yang adil dan makmur sesuai sila ke lima Pancasila. Termasuk kesadaran hukum masyarakat terhadap sertifikasi hak milik atas tanah hendaknya tidak hanya dipahami semata, akan tetapi juga sangatlah perlu dilaksanakan atau dijalankan oleh masyarakat secara umum dengan tujuan untuk menjaga hak-hak mereka terhadap tanah yang ia miliki atau kuasai. Kegiatan Pengabdian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan sosiologis dengan mendekatkan kepada masyarakat. Bahan materi diambil dari peraturan perundang-undangan, buku-buku, makalah-makalah dan dokumen-dokumen lain yang berkaitan dengan penelitian. Permasalahan yang diambil dari penelitian ini adalah bagaimana mendorong agar hak kepemilikan sertifikat tanah merupakan alat bukti yang kuat sehingga mema hami pentingnya pengurusan sertifikat tanah yang dimiliki menjadi sangat penting untuk dipahami bagi masyarakat RT 05-RW 05 Gayung Kebonsari Timur Kec. Ketintang Kota Surabaya.]]>
<![CDATA[KETIDAKJELASAN MAKNA “MENTRANSMISIKAN” PASAL 28 AYAT 2 UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK REVISI KEDUA ]]>
<![CDATA[Dwi Oktabiantoro]]>;
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.307
<![CDATA[Pasal 28 Ayat (2) Undang Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 mengatur larangan penyebaran informasi bermuatan kebencian. Namun, terjadi perbedaan penafsiran terkait makna “mentransmisikan” yang masih membingungkan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis penafsiran makna “mentransmisikan” berdasarkan gramatikal, sistematis, teleologis dan autentik. Hasil analisis menunjukkan secara gramatikal, mentransmisikan berarti mengirim informasi dari satu pihak ke pihak lain. Secara autentik, mentransmisikan adalah pengiriman informasi hanya ke satu orang penerima, bukan disebarluaskan. Secara sistematis, teleologis dan sosiologis, mentransmisikan perlu ditafsirkan hanya ke satu orang untuk memberikan perlindungan memadai dan selaras dengan penafsiran secara autentik. Kesimpulannya, mentransmisikan perlu ditafsirkan secara tegas hanya dikirim ke satu orang untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan mencegah ujaran kebencian melalui dunia maya.]]>
<![CDATA[KEABSAHAN PENETAPAN TERSANGKA DALAM PERATURAN KAPOLRI NO 6 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG PENETAPAN TERSANGKA ]]>
<![CDATA[Robiatul Adawiyah]]>;
<![CDATA[Evi Retno Wulan]]>
<![CDATA[ IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM) ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.317
<![CDATA[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah pengaturan penetapan tersangka dalam Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 Tentang Penyidikan Tindak Pidana sesuai dengan ketentuan dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan preskriptif. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh dari bahan pustaka, seperti buku, jurnal, dan peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan penafsiran “bukti permulaan” pada Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 6 Tahun 2019 dan KUHAP yang telah disempurnakan melalui Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 21/PUU-XII/2014 menyatakan bahwa terhadap suatu penyidikan haruslah terdapat 2 alat bukti yang cukup beserta keyakinan penyidik secara objektif untuk memenuhi dalam penetapan tersangka. Namun berbeda dengan ketentuan yang ada dalam PERKAP 6/2019 yang pada proses penyidikan, terdapat SPDP yang memuat identitas tersangka. Hal ini menjadi konflik norma, namun ketentuan yang berlaku pada PERKAP 6/2019 haruslah selaras dengan ketentuan dalam KUHAP.]]>
