Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.293
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika JURNAL RECHTENS SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum Al-Syakhsiyyah : Journal of Law and Family Studies Indonesian Journal of Law and Society Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law (IJIL) Journal of Business Improvement Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Achmad Hasan Basri
Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Implementasi Eugenetika Sebagai Alasan Praktik Aborsi Perspektif Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Positif Achmad Fabian Alief; Achmad Hasan Basri
SAKINAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 1 No. 2 (2023): SAKINAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : State Islamic University of Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/sakinah.v1i2.38

Abstract

Abstract: Abortion is a problematic issue in the conception of Positive Law and Islamic Law. Based on these two laws, the problem of abortion lies at the core of its implementation, because legally abortion is positively prohibited on the one hand because it violates human rights, but on the other hand abortion is a right that everyone has. This research has two study focuses, namely: The results of the research are, if viewed from Islamic law and positive law, the implementation of abortion or aborting a fetus is basically prohibited because it takes the life of the baby. However, there are several conditions that can be used as reasons for abortion to be permissible, such as a pregnancy that threatens the life of the mother and a pregnancy caused by rape, provided that this practice has legitimacy which includes advice and considerations from doctors who are experts in their field and authorized institutions. Keywords: Eugenics, Abortion, Islamic Law. Abstrak: Aborsi menjadi permasalahan yang problematis dalam konsepsi Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Berdasarkan kedua hukum tersebut, problem aborsi terletak pada inti pelaksanaannya, karena secara hukum positif aborsi dilarang di satu sisi karena bertentangan dengan HAM akan tetapi di sisi lain aborsi menjadi hak yang dimiliki oleh setiap orang. Penelitian ini memiliki dua fokus kajian yaitu: Adapun asil penelitiannya yaitu, jika ditinjau dari hukum Islam dan hukum positif, penerapan aborsi atau menggugurkan kandungan terhadap janin pada dasarnya dilarang karena hal tersebut menghilangkan nyawa sang bayi. Namun ada beberapa kondisi yang dapat dijadikan alasan sehingga aborsi boleh dilakukan, seperti kandungan yang mengancam keselamatan nyawa ibu dan kehamilan yang disebabkan pemerkosaan, dengan catatan praktik tersebut memiliki legitimasi yang meliputi saran dan pertimbangan dari dokter yang ahli di bidangnya serta lembaga yang berwenang; Kata Kunci: Eugenetika, Aborsi, Hukum Islam.
Konsep Pembebanan Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Perkara Pengakuan Ayah Biologis (Analisis Putusan Banding No.109/Pdt/2022/Pt Btn) Anjasmara Arrizal Mahfud; Achmad Hasan Basri
SAKINAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): SAKINAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : State Islamic University of Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35719/sakinah.v4i1.89

Abstract

This study examines the application of the reverse burden of proof in a civil case through the Decision of the Banten High Court Number 109/Pdt/2022/PT BTN. The case is noteworthy because the reverse burden of proof is generally applied in special criminal cases such as corruption or money laundering. In this case, however, the judges applied it in a tort case concerning the determination of a biological father, despite the general principle of civil evidence that “whoever asserts a claim must prove it.” This research uses a normative juridical method with conceptual, statutory, comparative, and case approaches. The analysis is based on primary and secondary legal materials to examine the normative framework and the value of substantive justice in the application of the reverse burden of proof. The results show that the judges in the Banten High Court decision adopted a more progressive approach in assessing evidence of a biological father–child relationship. From the perspective of positive law, the judges did not rigidly apply the burden of proof principle under Article 163 HIR or Article 1865 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Instead, they considered the evidentiary difficulties faced by the plaintiff and allowed the possibility of shifting the burden of proof to the defendant, consistent with the spirit of Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010. From the perspective of Islamic law, this reasoning is consistent with the principle of protecting lineage (ḥifẓ al-nasl) within the framework of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah. Scientific evidence such as DNA testing may be analogized to the concepts of qiyāfah and qarīnah in Islamic jurisprudence for establishing lineage. Thus, the reverse burden of proof in this case is better understood as a situational shifting of the burden of proof aimed at achieving substantive justice and protecting the rights of the child.
Co-Authors Achmad Fabian Alief Ali Arifin, Ali Anjasmara Arrizal Mahfud Azwar Cholili Dominikus Rato Fitrianingrum, Fatimah Azzahra Gautama Budi Arundhati, Gautama Budi Hendra Yulis Priyanto Huzaeni, Muchamad MAGHFIROH, ANISATUL Muchamad Huzaeni Mufidah Indana , Elizatul Muslih, Imam Muttaqin, Muh. Syaukin Nur Kholis Nury Khoiril Jamil Rumawi Rumawi Solihin, Rohmad Agus Surya Waliden , Ibnu Al Alwaton Umarwan Sutopo Urmawan Sutopo