Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.881
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lentera Hukum Veritas et Justitia Unes Law Review JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Supremasi BHIRAWA LAW JOURNAL JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Jurnal Jurisprudence
Y.A. Triana Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Peran Badan Pemulihan Aset di Kejaksaan Negeri Donggala Andika Maulana Syah Putra; Ronny Max Hendra; Rato, Dominikus; Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana
As-Syar i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga  Vol. 6 No. 4 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Nasional Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i4.5623

Abstract

This research explains the role of the Asset Recovery Agency (formerly known as the "Asset Recovery Center") at the Donggala District Attorney's Office. In Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia jo. Law Number 11 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 2 paragraph (1) essentially states that the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia is a government institution that exercises state power in the field of prosecution and other authorities based on the law. The research results show that the purpose of the establishment of the Asset Recovery Agency (formerly known as the "Asset Recovery Center") at the Donggala District Attorney's Office is based on the principles of social justice and legal certainty as stipulated by the Prosecutor's Law, whereby the return of assets to the rightful owners or to the State is carried out to achieve this goal, thereby providing a deterrent effect on criminal offenders. Because the illegal acquisition of something or an asset, the asset recovery handling procedure at the Donggala District Attorney's Office is carried out in accordance with the laws and regulations but lacks transparency, as evidenced by the absence of socialization of the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) or Asset Recovery Agency (BPA) to the general public both online and offline. As a result, the general public will have difficulty accessing information regarding the clarity of the status of confiscated goods or assets related to criminal offenses managed by the prosecutor's office. The author believes this because, based on a comparison with the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) and the Asset Recovery Agency (BPA) of the Donggala District Attorney's Office and the Palu District Attorney's Office, information regarding the Asset Recovery Center (PPA) and the Asset Recovery Agency (BPA) and Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) is easily accessible online. To achieve this goal, the PPA and BPA should innovate so that the public can easily access the information provided by the prosecutor's office.
Perbandingan Hukum Legalitas Aborsi Menurut KUHP Indonesia dan Japan Penal Code 2023 Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila; Setyawan, Ady Nur; Ohoiwutun, Y.A. Triana; Suarda, I Gede Widhiana
Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Hukum & Politik Vol 3 No 5 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Yayasan pendidikan dzurriyatul Quran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61104/alz.v3i5.2389

Abstract

Aborsi merupakan isu kompleks yang melibatkan dimensi moral, medis, dan hukum serta menjadi topik diskusi yang terus berkembang di ruang akademik dan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dan membandingkan pengaturan hukum mengenai legalitas aborsi berdasarkan KUHP Indonesia 2023 dan Japan Penal Code 2023 beserta regulasi kesehatannya. Metode yang digunakan ialah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif yang dianalisis secara kualitatif melalui kajian pustaka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua negara sama-sama mengkategorikan aborsi sebagai tindak pidana, namun memberikan pengecualian terhadap kondisi medis darurat serta kehamilan akibat pemerkosaan. Perbedaan mendasar tampak pada alasan pembenar dan batas usia kehamilan, di mana Indonesia menetapkan batas 14 minggu dengan persyaratan administratif ketat, sedangkan Jepang melalui Maternal Protection Act memperbolehkan hingga 22 minggu dengan mempertimbangkan faktor sosial-ekonomi. Terdapat pula variasi dalam sanksi pidana, di mana Indonesia memberikan hukuman yang lebih berat terutama bagi tenaga medis yang terlibat. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan perlunya reformulasi kebijakan hukum Indonesia agar lebih seimbang dalam melindungi hak hidup janin sekaligus menjamin keselamatan dan otonomi reproduksi perempuan
Co-Authors Abid Uais Al-qarni Adiatma, Achmad Fahmi Ainul Azizah Aleya Zeneizha Andika Maulana Syah Putra Andreas, Tonny Ayudyana Suyudi, Godeliva Chatterjee, Pyali Dominikus Rato Fanny Tanuwijaya Firman Floranta Adonara, Firman Floranta Godeliva Ayudyana Suyudi I Gede Widhiana Suarda Laksana, Trio Angga Prabhata, Evoryo Carel Pradayani, Santi Putra, Ahmad Al Farobi Gomila Qoyyima, Azrotul Ronny Max Hendra Samsudi . Sapti Prihatmini Setyawan, Ady Nur Silaban, Rendy Tridolok Taniady, Vicko widowati widowati Windy Puri Astuti