Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching

ENHANCING PUBLIC SPEAKING TO ENGLISH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS VIA EXTEMPORANEOUS SPEECH: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH USING SPEAKING EVALUATION CRITERIA Defy Gustianing; Arif Alexander Bastian; Eka Pratiwi Yunianti; Aji Sugiharto, Prasetyawan
Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT)
Publisher : Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30604/aijelt.v3i1.1632

Abstract

This study explores the enhancement of public speaking skills in English for young learners through the implementation of extemporaneous speech techniques, utilizing a comprehensive approach guided by speaking evaluation criteria. Extemporaneous speech, which requires speakers to deliver presentations with minimal preparation, fosters critical thinking, quick organization, and engaging delivery skills essential for effective public speaking. By employing the Oxford Evaluation Criteria, which assesses key components such as the oral introduction, body of speech, summary, attire, performance, audience engagement, creativity, and use of sources, this study provides a structured framework for evaluating and improving these abilities. The research compares the performance of a control group using traditional speaking methods with an experiment group practicing extemporaneous speech. Results indicate that the experiment group shows significantly higher achievement, demonstrating enhanced fluency, coherence, audience engagement, and creativity. These findings suggest that integrating extemporaneous speaking into language learning programs can substantially improve young learners' public speaking proficiency, making it a valuable approach in educational settings.
IMPLEMENTING AUTHENTIC MATERIALS OF PROCEDURE TEXTS TO FOSTER STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ACHIEVEMENT AT THE SECOND GRADE OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Alexander Bastian, Arif
Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT) Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT)
Publisher : Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30604/aijelt.v1i1.750

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine second-year high school students' attitudes toward the use of authentic materials in the classroom and to determine whether or not they had a positive impact on their speaking performance when reading procedural texts. Thirty students from Science 3 class at SMA N 15 in Bandar Lampung were selected as the sample for this study. In this study, participants were divided into a pre- and post-test group. The questionnaire and oral communication test were used to compile the data. According to the findings, students' proficiency in public speaking was elevated after being exposed to authentic materials. The average gain was 17.40 points, with post-test scores averaging 79.43 compared to the pre-test average of 62.03. A p-value of 0.05 or less indicates that the level of significance is lower than the data. Using primary sources may have helped students improve their public speaking skills. Contrarily, 22 students (73.03%) reported being active, liking, and satisfied with the teaching learning process when using authentic materials. The preceding findings suggest that using genuine resources can boost students' speaking proficiency in procedure texts and increase their satisfaction with the classroom experience.
THE ADVANTAGES AND BARRIERS OF THINK PAIR SHARE TECHNIQUE IN READING COMPREHENSION ACHIEVEMENT IN EFL CLASS: A REVIEW Arif Alexander Bastian; Rizki Anugrah Putri Rahayu
Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT) Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT)
Publisher : Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30604/aijelt.v2i1.1083

Abstract

The goals of this research are twofold: (1) to learn more about the benefits of adopting TPS, and (2) to identify the challenges that arise when using TPS to the development of reading abilities and provide potential solutions to them. Cooperative learning is one of several effective pedagogical approaches that may be used to instruct students in reading. The Think-Pair-Share method is one kind of collaborative education. This research shows the ups and downs of using the Think, Pair, Share technique in EFL reading instruction. TPS allows students to work both alone and in groups, provided they follow the methods provided. TPS identifies the text's message in pairs to facilitate student comprehension. Using this method, kids may be engaged, motivated, and ultimately successful in their reading comprehension. However, TPS has a few limitations that hinder reading comprehension. Some pupils don't pay attention since they know they can talk about anything else with their companion other than the assigned material. Then, pupils who aren't well-versed in the material (the questions) are more inclined to cheat for their partners. Teachers may help students overcome these difficulties by choosing engaging subjects and pairing them together effectively.
ANALYZING THE WRITING ASSESSMENT TO IMPROVE STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN WRITING PERFORMANCE Septika Ariyanti; Dyah Fitri Mulati; Defy Gustianing; Eka Pratiwi Yunianti; Bastian, Arif Alexander
Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT)
Publisher : Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30604/aijelt.v2i2.1442

Abstract

A writing assessment is a review of an individual's writing abilities and skills. Usually, the goal is to assess a person's written communication skills. There are numerous various ways to evaluate writing, including essays, performance tasks, and multiple-choice exams. The purpose of a writing evaluation is to thoroughly evaluate an individual's writing abilities, including their command of syntax, vocabulary, style, and organization.The purpose of this research is to analyze the writing assessment of some previous research related for students’ ability in writing. The amount of the research are three research. This research belongs to library research. In collecting the data, the writer use documentation. The instrument used was the writer itself. The data will be analyzed descriptively by use table and words explanation. The result of this research reveals some ways to analyze students’ writing paragraph.
A PRAGMATIC STUDY: ILLOCUTIONARY ACTS IN "YOWES BEN 2" MOVIE Arnoi, Khoirun Nisaa'; Muhamad Safi'i; Arif Alexander Bastian
Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2024): Aisyah Journal of English Language Teaching (AIJELT)
Publisher : Universitas Aisyah Pringsewu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30604/aijelt.v3i1.1604

Abstract

This study explores speech acts as pragmatic studies in the film "Yowes Ben 2". The researcher will investigate the many forms of speech acts and classify them focusing on the illocutionary categories employed in the film. This study follows John Rogers Searle's (1975) illocutionary action theory, which is assertive (the speaker's confidence in something), directive (something the listener should do), commissive (commitment to do something), expressive (expression of an attitude or feeling), and declarative (making changes such as pointing, stating, etc.)The research design implemented in this study is qualitative. Researchers gathered information by screening the film "Yowes Ben 2" and analyzing the different forms of speaking acts. Researchers employed content analysis to analyze their data. The steps in data analysis are as follows: the researcher will identify, analyze, interpret, and draw conclusions. In accordance to the data, expressive speech acts account for the greatest number of illocutionary acts (56%). Directive speech accounted for 38%, commissive speech 3%, representational speech 0%, and declarative speech 3%.