Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Advocacy for Social Transformation: Pancasila-Based Legal Education and the Street Law Model in Fostering Nationalism Among Youth in Kenteng Village Wedhatami, Bayangsari; Arifin, Ridwan; Alkadri, Riska; Puspasari, Dewi; Ananta, Bintang Rafli
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol 6 No 2 (2024): Navigating Justice: Empowering Communities with Legal Advocacy and Support (Artic
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

This paper investigates the role of Pancasila-based legal education through the Street Law model in advocating for social transformation and fostering nationalism among youth in Kenteng Village. As Indonesia strives to strengthen its national identity, particularly among younger generations, integrating Pancasila— the nation’s foundational ideology— into legal education becomes essential. The study outlines a community-driven program that engages university students and local youth in interactive legal workshops, promoting awareness of rights, responsibilities, and civic engagement rooted in Pancasila values. Through participatory methods, the program encourages youth to actively engage in discussions about legal issues and national identity, thereby enhancing their understanding of Indonesian democracy and governance. The findings reveal that this approach not only cultivates a sense of nationalism among participants but also empowers them to become advocates for their communities. Participants reported increased confidence in navigating legal matters and a stronger commitment to civic involvement. This research highlights the importance of advocacy in legal education as a catalyst for social change, demonstrating that the Street Law model can effectively bridge the gap between academic knowledge and practical application in the community. Ultimately, the paper argues for broader implementation of Pancasila-based legal education programs across Indonesia, suggesting that such initiatives can play a vital role in nurturing a generation of informed and engaged citizens dedicated to the ideals of Pancasila.

Improving Law Student Ability on Legal Writing through Critical and Logical Thinking by IRAC Method Arifin, Ridwan; Alkadri, Riska; Sari, Dewi Puspa; Resthiningsih, Lilies; Holish, Amarru Muftie
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 1 No. 1 (2019): Strengthening Community and Legal Sector in Indonesia
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v1i1.22799

The lack of good stigma is attached to student activists, ranging from the unsatisfactory level of academic quality, graduating on time, not responsive and very reactive, hard and opposing views, to demonstrations that are colored by violence. The stigma is only in a few cases, not all activists face such conditions, but this stigma seems to have been far attached. The development of student activists today demands that activists must also have three literacy abilities: data literacy, humanitarian literacy, and technological literacy. However, based on the preliminary results of this activity, 90 percent of UNNES Law School student activists agreed that activists must have a critical attitude and critical writing skills, but only about 10 percent of activists who had taken it seriously (thought publications in various forms). This activity is aimed at developing the critical abilities of student activists through increased publications in various media. This activity also aims to establish a critical writing community for student activists and present a concrete forum for channeling ideas and solutions for student activists in writing that can be read by many people. This activity is carried out through a critical thinking approach in legal studies using the IRAC (Issue, Rule, Application, Conclusion) method which is commonly used in analyzing various cases in legal study thinking.

Advocacy for Social Transformation: Pancasila-Based Legal Education and the Street Law Model in Fostering Nationalism Among Youth in Kenteng Village Wedhatami, Bayangsari; Arifin, Ridwan; Alkadri, Riska; Puspasari, Dewi; Ananta, Bintang Rafli
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Navigating Justice: Empowering Communities with Legal Advocacy and Support
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v6i2.29867

This paper investigates the role of Pancasila-based legal education through the Street Law model in advocating for social transformation and fostering nationalism among youth in Kenteng Village. As Indonesia strives to strengthen its national identity, particularly among younger generations, integrating Pancasila— the nation’s foundational ideology— into legal education becomes essential. The study outlines a community-driven program that engages university students and local youth in interactive legal workshops, promoting awareness of rights, responsibilities, and civic engagement rooted in Pancasila values. Through participatory methods, the program encourages youth to actively engage in discussions about legal issues and national identity, thereby enhancing their understanding of Indonesian democracy and governance. The findings reveal that this approach not only cultivates a sense of nationalism among participants but also empowers them to become advocates for their communities. Participants reported increased confidence in navigating legal matters and a stronger commitment to civic involvement. This research highlights the importance of advocacy in legal education as a catalyst for social change, demonstrating that the Street Law model can effectively bridge the gap between academic knowledge and practical application in the community. Ultimately, the paper argues for broader implementation of Pancasila-based legal education programs across Indonesia, suggesting that such initiatives can play a vital role in nurturing a generation of informed and engaged citizens dedicated to the ideals of Pancasila.

Rethinking Justice: The Urgent Need to Simplify Legal Appeals and Cassation for Faster Administrative Court Decisions Hakim, Putri Balqis Nuril; Rochman, Aulia; Alkadri, Riska; Maritah, Martitah
Indonesian State Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Indonesian State Law Review, April 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/islrev.v7i1.18865

The efficiency of procedural examinations in Indonesia’s state administrative courts is essential for ensuring timely justice, especially in cases requiring urgent resolution. However, the current appeals and cassation processes often extend the overall timeline, undermining the court's ability to address urgent matters swiftly. While the initial procedural examination may be expedited, the subsequent appeal and cassation stages follow the same cumbersome steps as ordinary procedures, leading to significant delays—sometimes spanning several months. This prolonged timeline is particularly concerning when quick resolution is critical, as it can hinder the effective administration of justice. This study examines the necessity of simplifying the legal appeals and cassation processes to ensure faster and more efficient case resolutions in state administrative courts. Using a normative juridical research method, the paper assesses the inefficiencies of the current system, highlighting the urgent need for reform. It draws on Lawrence M. Friedman’s legal system theory to identify gaps within the existing framework that contribute to delays and proposes strategic interventions to streamline these processes. The findings suggest that, in addition to simplifying procedural measures, the integration of technology—such as an e-court system—could significantly expedite the appeal and cassation processes. By embracing digital solutions, administrative courts can reduce case backlogs and enhance efficiency, thus improving the overall responsiveness of the judicial system. This research contributes novel insights into how legal procedures can be reformed to better meet the demands of urgent cases. The study emphasizes the critical importance of judicial efficiency and technological innovation, offering actionable recommendations for policymakers to improve administrative justice in Indonesia.

Indonesia’s New Penal Code: Harmonizing with Global Justice or Defying International Norms? Arifin, Ridwan; Alkadri, Riska; Smith, Robert Brian; Smith, Nucharee Nuchkoom; Wahyudin, Wahyudin
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14271

This study critically examines Indonesia's new penal code through the lens of international legal norms, exploring whether it genuinely embodies the principles of global justice. Despite the code's ambitious reforms aimed at modernizing Indonesia's legal framework, our analysis reveals significant gaps between its provisions and internationally accepted standards, particularly in areas such as human rights, due process, and equality before the law. The urgency of this research lies in Indonesia's important role in Southeast Asia, where legal frameworks can influence regional governance and human rights practices. Novelty arises from our comparative approach, juxtaposing Indonesia’s penal code against a backdrop of global legal norms while considering local cultural and societal contexts. This study uncovers how the interplay between domestic priorities and international expectations can lead to compromises that undermine the integrity of justice. Our findings contribute to the ongoing discourse on legal reform in emerging democracies, highlighting the challenges of aligning national legislation with international standards. By providing concrete recommendations for policy makers, legal practitioners, and civil society, this research emphasizes the need for a holistic approach to legal reform that respects both local values and global commitments. Ultimately, we argue that Indonesia's new penal code is not just a legal document but a reflection of its aspirations for justice, demanding scrutiny and ongoing dialogue to ensure it meets the standards of global justice in practice.

Transforming Legal Scholarship: Strategic and Innovative Approaches to Developing a Student Edited Law Journal Toward International Recognition Arifin, Ridwan; Alkadri, Riska; Irawaty; Baiquni, Muhammad Iqbal
LITIGASI Vol. 25 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v25i2.35412

The transformation of legal scholarship in higher education increasingly depends on the capacity of student-edited law journals to align with international standards of academic quality, editorial integrity, and global visibility. In Indonesia, several student-run law journals—such as those managed by Universitas Negeri Semarang (UNNES), Universitas Gadjah Mada, and Universitas Indonesia—have begun experimenting with digital platforms, peer review systems, and open-access dissemination to enhance their academic standing. Building upon previous research adopting and modifying the Harvard Law Review model of editorial management, this study explores strategic and innovative approaches to developing student-edited law journals toward international recognition. Using a qualitative and comparative descriptive method, it analyzes the transformation of editorial practices, digitalization processes, peer review mechanisms, and collaborative initiatives across selected Indonesian law faculties. The findings indicate that sustainable transformation requires a holistic strategy integrating academic rigor, technological innovation, and strong institutional support. Moreover, international benchmarking, ethical publication standards, and cross-border academic partnerships are identified as crucial factors in improving journal reputation and visibility. This study contributes to the advancement of legal scholarship in Indonesia by proposing a practical framework that can guide student-edited law journals—particularly at UNNES—in evolving from local academic initiatives into internationally reputable platforms for legal research and discourse.

Title

Found 16 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 16 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 16 Documents
Search