Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

PENERAPAN PIDANA TAMBAHAN DALAM PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI PADA TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP Hariman Satria
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 10, No 2 (2017): EX FIDA BONA
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v10i2.18

ABSTRAKMahkamah Agung melalui Putusan Nomor 1554 K/PID.SUS/2015 menghukum terdakwa PT KA yang diwakili oleh SR selaku direktur utama, karena melakukan pembakaran hutan yang merusak lingkungan hidup, dengan pidana denda sebesar Rp3.000.000.000,- Permasalahan yang timbul adalah bagaimanakah penerapan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana lingkungan hidup, kaitannya dengan pidana tambahan berupa pemulihan kerugian akibat kerusakan lingkungan yang terjadi? Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan dua pendekatan, yaitu pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi belum dilakukan secara maksimal karena didasari oleh tiga alasan. Pertama, terdakwa dipidana denda dengan menggunakan ancaman pidana minimal sebagaimana yang disebutkan dalam Pasal 108 Undang- Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup. Kedua, terdakwa tidak dikenai pidana tindakan tata tertib seperti perbaikan akibat tindak pidana guna memulihkan kerugian keuangan negara. Ketiga, terdakwa juga tidak dikenai pidana tambahan. Tegasnya putusan a quo belum maksimal baik dilihat dari sisi pemulihan kerugian keuangan negara, maupun dari sisi sanksi pidana denda kepada pelaku.Kata kunci: pidana tambahan, pertanggungjawaban pidana, korporasi, lingkungan hidup. ABSTRACTSupreme Court convicted PT KA represented by SR as the President Director, through Court Decision Number 1554 K/PID.SUS/2015 on an environmentally damaging forest fire to a maximum fine of Rp3,000,000,000,- The problem addressed in this research analysis is how the implementation of corporate criminal liability in environmental crime related to additional criminal charges, in the form of compensation for environmental damage caused? The method used is a normative legal research, focusing on two approaches: case and conceptual approaches. The results indicated that corporate criminal liability has not performed optimally for three reasons. First, the defendant is subject to minimal criminal sanction as mentioned in Article 108 of Law on Environmental Protection and Management. Second, the defendant is not subject to sanction of disciplinary action, such as the restoration of state financial losses. Third, the defendant is also not subject to additional criminal charges. As a result, a quo decision is not maximal both in terms of state financial losses recovery and criminal sanction of fines to the offender.Keywords: additional charges, criminal liability, corporate, environment.

Environmental Pollution: Assessing the Criminal Liability of Corporations Hariman Satria
Hasanuddin Law Review VOLUME 4 ISSUE 2, AUGUST 2018
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Hasanuddin University

The Supreme Court sentenced PT Dongwoo Enviromental Indonesia (PT DEI) for disposing of hazardous and toxic wastes polluting the environment. Meanwhile, PT Adei Plantation & Industry (PT API) was charged with crime for the destruction of land damaging the environment. The research method used is normative legal research, which focuses on two approaches: case approach and conceptual approach. The results show that, first, PT DEI and PT API are charged criminally represented by the board as functioneel daderschap or directing mind and will. Second, PT DEI is charged with subsidized charges, while PT API is charged to alternative charges. Third, PT DEI and PT API are said to have committed a criminal act because management either the directors or regular employees commits a criminal offense for and on behalf of the corporation or in favor of the corporation. Fourth, to prove a corporation fault is through the aggregation of management mistakes or controlling personnel or regular employees in the corporation structure. Fifth, the principal penalty imposed on PT DEI is a fine of Rp 1.500,000,000. Similarly, PT API is fined Rp 650.000.000. Sixth; PT DEI is charged to additional crime in the form of deprivation of profits and closure of the company while PT API is an improvement due to crime. Seventh, with the closing of the company, the judges did not order the executors to liquidate the assets of PT DEI. Eighth, the imposition of the company's closing sanctions should take into account the impacts, such as the termination of employee relation and the interests of shareholders.

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA KORPORASI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA SUMBER DAYA ALAM Hariman Satria
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 28, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

AbstractIn ius constitutum of Natural Resources, the liability of corporate criminal, in any case, has been set in fve laws. First, fsheries and forestry law have similar formulation that corporations act as makers–undertakers are convicted. Second, plantation law, corporations act as makers –the corporations are convicted. Third, environmental law, corporations as makers –the corporation and the orderer are convicted. Fourth, mineral and coal mining law, corporations as makers –the board and the corporation are convicted. Indeed, there are inconsistencies in the regulation of corporate criminal liability in natural resources sector resulting in legal uncertainty.IntisariDalam ius constitutum SDA, paling tidak pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi diatur oleh lima undangundang. Pertama UU perikanan dan kehutanan memiliki rumusan yang sama bahwa korporasi sebagai pembuat–pengurus dipidana. Kedua, UU perkebunan, korporasi sebagai pembuat–korporasi dipidana. Ketiga, UU lingkungan hidup, korporasi sebagai pembuat–korporasi dan orang yang memberi perintah dipidana. Keempat, UU minerba, korporasi sebagai pembuat–pengurus dan korporasi yang dipidana. Tegasnya ada inkonsistensi dalam pengaturan pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi di sektor SDA sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum.

Menakar Perlindungan Justice Colaborator Hariman Satria
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Corruption is one form of systematic organized crimes performed with complicated modus operandi. Disclosing of this crime, in addition to requiring special equipment, also needs a certain method. One of the methods is using actors who collaborate or justice collaborator. The provisions on justice collaboratororiginally referred to Article 10 paragraph (2) of Law No. 13 of 2006 on Protection of Witnesses and Victims –but there are indications that these provisions do not provide protection to the justice collaborator. Because even though he plays as a collaborating actor, it does not result in a loss of authority of the state to prosecute the concerned. This provision is considered violating the principle of lex certain criminal law, for its ambiguity and multiple interpretations. Constitutional Court in its decision No. 42/PUU-VIII/2010states that Article 10 paragraph (2) regarding a quoprovision is not contrary to the 1945 Constitution. Without realizing it, Constitutional Court has come affirming the lack of protection on the collaborating actors. The fate of justice collaboratorthen finds the clarity in Article 10 paragraph (1) of Law No. 31 of 2014 on Protection on Witnesses and Victims. In the future, with reference to a quo provision, there is no guarantee to the justice collaboratorthat he would not be prosecuted either criminal or civil, except for statements or testimony that is not done in good faith. Besides regulated under legislation of Witnesses and Victims Protection, protection of the justice collaboratorhas also been set in UNTOC 2000 and UNCAC 2003.

Sexual-Violence Offenses in Indonesia: Analysis of the Criminal Policy in the Law Number 12 of 2022 Topo Santoso; Hariman Satria
PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Vol 10, No 1 (2023): PADJADJARAN JURNAL ILMU HUKUM (JOURNAL OF LAW)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

In 2022, Indonesia enacted the Law on Sexual Violence Offenses. The Law criminalizes ten acts of sexual violence and categorizes them as criminal offenses. The Law aims to prevent criminal offenses of sexual violence through deterrence, coordination, and monitoring by central and regional law enforcement agencies. The Law adopts both sanctions and treatment in the matter of criminal sanctions. The Law distinguishes types of punishment based on principal and additional penalties, including against corporations. Based on the severity of the penalty, the Law includes indefinite and definite sentences. However, the Law remains weak on restitution that should be action sanctions rather than criminal sanctions and lack of corporate criminal liability regulation. The severity of the penalty that was adopted by the Law should be in the form of indefinite sentences to provide the maximum deterrent effect. In addition, there is a lack of synchronization between the Law and other laws, including the Laws on Human Trafficking, Pornography, and the Elimination of Domestic Violence.DOI: https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v10n1.a4

PROOF OF THE CRIME OF MURDER REGARDLESS OF THE USE OF FORENSIC AUTOPSY EVIDENCE (Kendari District Court Study) Irmansah, Irmansah; Satria, Hariman; Dagani, Gamlan
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol 14, No 1 (2024): JURNAL DUSTURIAH
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v14i1.23289

In essence, evidence in criminal cases is an effort to provide evidence through tools that can prove a case and its allegations, one of which is forensic autopsy evidence which is used as evidence. In fact, forensic autopsy evidence is very important in criminal homicide cases because it can confirm a person's death carried out by a forensic autopsy expert and speed up the court process. The aim is to prove the KUHAP evidentiary system through forensic evidence, and determine the value of forensic evidence in murder, and use it as expert testimony, this is also used as a basis for the judge's decision against the defendant. The research carried out is empirical legal research using an empirical approach from secondary data by managing primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the research results, first we have to know that every country definitely has laws or regulations that apply in each country. As in murder cases, if witness statements are not always correct, judges really need forensic autopsy evidence as expert testimony, and it is rare to find witnesses who directly witnessed the crime of murder, and this becomes an obstacle for judges. Then in murder cases, many families do not want to have a forensic autopsy done. The meaning of a forensic autopsy is to find the true case and look for the causes that caused the person's death. Then, for clues and truth, a forensic autopsy must be carried out to achieve justice.

MENALAR PUTUSAN SURAT DAKWAAN YANG BATAL DEMI HUKUM DALAM DELIK PERZINAAN: Kajian Putusan Nomor 501/Pid.B/2022/PN.Kdi Al Yusak, Fatwa; Satria, Hariman
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 17 No. 2 (2024): Child Protection
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v17i2.650

Putusan Nomor 501/Pid.B/2022/PN.Kdi merupakan putusan yang mengundang polemik karena dakwaan yang diajukan oleh jaksa penuntut umum dinyatakan batal demi hukum. Kasus yang menjadi objek putusan ini berkaitan dengan tindak pidana perzinaan. Dalam putusan ini, majelis hakim menilai bahwa dakwaan yang diajukan oleh jaksa penuntut umum tidak memenuhi syarat formil yang telah ditetapkan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hal ini menimbulkan pertanyaan mengenai dasar pertimbangan hukum yang digunakan oleh majelis hakim dalam memutuskan bahwa dakwaan tersebut batal demi hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan yuridis kualitatif. Analisis dilakukan melalui penggabungan pendekatan kasus dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian mengungkapkan beberapa alasan yang melatarbelakangi putusan tersebut. Pertama, dakwaan dinyatakan batal demi hukum karena dianggap tidak cermat, tidak jelas, dan tidak lengkap, sehingga unsur-unsur delik yang didakwakan tidak terhubung dengan fakta-fakta materiil yang relevan. Kedua, meskipun dakwaan jaksa penuntut umum memiliki kekurangan, majelis hakim tidak seharusnya langsung menyatakan batal demi hukum, karena hal tersebut bertentangan dengan Pasal 1 angka 11 jo. Pasal 194 KUHAP. Ketiga, pembatalan dakwaan tidak sesuai dengan jenis putusan akhir dalam perkara ini. Keempat, merujuk pada Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 8/PUU-XX/2022, jaksa penuntut umum seharusnya mengajukan kembali dakwaan ke Pengadilan Negeri Kendari agar perkara dapat dilanjutkan ke tahap persidangan.

PROOF OF THE CRIME OF MURDER REGARDLESS OF THE USE OF FORENSIC AUTOPSY EVIDENCE (Kendari District Court Study) Irmansah, Irmansah; Satria, Hariman; Dagani, Gamlan
Dusturiyah: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL DUSTURIAH
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/dusturiyah.v14i1.23289

In essence, evidence in criminal cases is an effort to provide evidence through tools that can prove a case and its allegations, one of which is forensic autopsy evidence which is used as evidence. In fact, forensic autopsy evidence is very important in criminal homicide cases because it can confirm a person's death carried out by a forensic autopsy expert and speed up the court process. The aim is to prove the KUHAP evidentiary system through forensic evidence, and determine the value of forensic evidence in murder, and use it as expert testimony, this is also used as a basis for the judge's decision against the defendant. The research carried out is empirical legal research using an empirical approach from secondary data by managing primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. Based on the research results, first we have to know that every country definitely has laws or regulations that apply in each country. As in murder cases, if witness statements are not always correct, judges really need forensic autopsy evidence as expert testimony, and it is rare to find witnesses who directly witnessed the crime of murder, and this becomes an obstacle for judges. Then in murder cases, many families do not want to have a forensic autopsy done. The meaning of a forensic autopsy is to find the true case and look for the causes that caused the person's death. Then, for clues and truth, a forensic autopsy must be carried out to achieve justice.

PERLUASAN MAKNA KERUGIAN KEUANGAN NEGARA DALAM KORUPSI IZIN USAHA PERTAMBANGAN Satria, Hariman
Jurnal Yudisial Vol. 13 No. 2 (2020): VINCULUM JURIS
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v13i2.417

ABSTRAKDalam Putusan Nomor 2633 K/Pid.Sus/2018, majelis hakim memperluas makna kerugian keuangan negara dengan menambahkan kerusakan lingkungan dan biaya pemulihan melalui scientific or expert evidence. Permasalahan yang akan dijawab adalah bagaimanakah konteks kerugian keuangan negara yang maknanya diperluas menjadi kerusakan lingkungan dan biaya pemulihan dalam putusan a quo. Jenis penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan analisis yuridis kualitatif. Untuk menemukan jawaban permasalahan, penulis menggunakan metode pendekatan kasus dan pendekatan konseptual. Temuan dari penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut: (1) agar kerusakan lingkungan dan biaya pemulihannya dapat dikategorikan sebagai kerugian keuangan negara, maka perbuatan mesti dimaknai sebagai tindakan yang melanggar Undang-Undang Anti Korupsi. Kemudian menempatkan lingkungan hidup, kekayaan negara, dan keuangan negara sebagai satu kesatuan; (2) perluasan makna kerugian keuangan negara tersebut mendasarkan pada pendapat ahli sebagai expert evidence; (3) perluasan makna tersebut sejalan dengan Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Pemeriksaan Keuangan Negara; dan (4) dalam memperluas makna kerugian keuangan negara, majelis hakim menggunakan interpretasi doktriner.Â Kata kunci: kerugian keuangan negara; penyalahgunaan wewenang; izin usaha pertambangan.Â ABSTRACTÂ In Decision Number 2633 K/Pid.Sus/2018, the panel of judges expanded the meaning of state nancial losses by adding environmental damage and recovery costs through scienti c or expert evidence. The question that will be answered is how to understand the context of state nancial losses whose meaning is extended to environmental damage and recovery costs in the a quo decision. This type of research is a normative legal research that uses qualitative juridical analysis. To nd answers to problems, the authors use a case approach method and a conceptual approach. The ndings of this study are: (1) in order for environmental damage and recovery costs to be categorized as losses to state nances, actions must be interpreted as actions that violate the Anti-Corruption Law. Then put the environment, state assets and state nances as one unit; (2) expanding the meaning of state nancial losses based on expert opinion as expert evidence; (3) the expansion of meaning is in line with the Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia Regulation Number 1 of 2017 concerning State Financial Audit Standards; and (4) in expanding the meaning of state nancial loss, the panel of judges uses a doctrinal interpretation.Â Keywords: state nancial losses; power abuse; mining business license.Â Â

Punishment Under Special Minimum Criminal Threat In the Crime of Child Abuse (Study of Decision Number 1041 K/Pid.Sus/2020) Ahmad, Rosman; Satria, Hariman; Abdaud, Faisal; Mafardin, Mafardin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v22i3.4909

The imposition of a penalty below the special minimum in the crime of molestation of children is a very important issue in criminal law. This crime aims to provide more effective protection to victims of immorality involving children. In some cases of child abuse, the judge handed down a verdict below the special minimum. The offense that is the focus of this study is how the judge considers sentencing under the special minimum criminal threat based on Decision Number 1041 K/Pid.Sus/2020 in the case of criminal acts of child abuse? The research method used is a type of normative legal research using 2 (two) legal approaches, namely the legislative approach and the case approach. The results of the study concluded that the Supreme Court in decision Number 1041/Pid.sus/2020 has strengthened the judex facti decision that imposes a penalty below the special minimum limit to the defendant so that the decision contradicts the provisions of Article 82 paragraph (1) of Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection is the minimum limit of 5 (five) years and a maximum of 15 (fifteen) years.

Title

Found 24 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 24 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 24 Documents
Search