Articles
<![CDATA[Assistance in obtaining the marketing authorization for the home food industry of Omah Kripik Mbote ]]>
<![CDATA[Muhammad Luthfi]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari]]>
<![CDATA[ Community Empowerment Vol 9 No 2 (2024) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.31603/ce.10844
<![CDATA[Omah Kripik Mbote, one of the household food industry (IRTP), encounters challenges in acquiring distribution permits, a crucial step in initiating an IRTP business. One major hurdle is the lack of comprehension and knowledge regarding the permit processing procedures. To address this issue, assistance was provided to facilitate the acquisition of an IRTP marketing authorization for Omah Kripik Mbote. This assistance aims to offer a comprehensive understanding of the procedures involved in obtaining an IRTP marketing authorization and processing a Home Industry Food Production Certificate (SPP-IRT) for Omah Kripik Mbote. The approach utilized in this assistance includes both classical and individualized methods, focusing on: a) disseminating information about the procedures for obtaining IRTP marketing authorization; b) aiding in identifying the requirements for acquiring IRTP marketing authorization; and c) guiding through the process of obtaining IRTP marketing authorization. As a result of this assistance, Omah Kripik Mbote has gained a better grasp of the procedures for obtaining IRTP marketing authorization, along with the issuance of SPP-IRT with PIRT numbers.]]>
<![CDATA[PENDAMPINGAN MASYARAKAT DUSUN KLANDUNGAN DESA LANDUNGSARI KECAMATAN DAU KABUPATEN MALANG ATAS DAMPAK PEMBANGUNAN PENGINAPAN ]]>
<![CDATA[Kurniawan, Kukuh Dwi]]>;
<![CDATA[Indri Hapsari, Dwi Ratna]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Pengabdian dan Peningkatan Mutu Masyarakat (Janayu) Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): Jurnal Pengabdian dan Peningkatan Mutu Masyarakat ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22219/janayu.v2i2.15675
<![CDATA[CSR implementation in Indonesia includes social and environmental responsibility. As felt by the people of Klandungan Hamlet, Landungsari Village, Dau District, Malang Regency, which was affected by the process of building a home stay by a commercial company in Malang Regency. There is a need for a symbiotic mutualism relationship between business actors in running their businesses and the community can also be able to carry out activities properly in the process of development and operations of the company in the future. The purpose of this service is to provide socialization and assist residents in fulfilling their rights over the development and / or operations of the company so that in the future there will be no conflicts. The method used is to accompany the negotiation meeting of the parties without taking sides, drafting the agreement until a win-win solution is reached. The result of this service is that the parties reach an agreement with the signing of a joint statement which can be used as a guide if a conflict arises.]]>
<![CDATA[Cryptocurrency assets as a physical collateral in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Wardoyo, Yohana Puspitasari]]>;
<![CDATA[Hapsari, Dwi Ratna Indri]]>
<![CDATA[ Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 31 No. 1 (2023): March ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v31i1.24190
<![CDATA[Cryptocurrency investment is currently expanding quickly on a global scale as well as in Indonesia. On the one hand, cryptocurrency can be used as a medium of exchange or a form of money, which represents the original purpose of cryptocurrency. On the other hand, it can also be used as a commodity or as digital assets, also known as crypto assets. Cryptocurrency is illegal to use as money in Indonesia, but it is legal to exchange it as an asset. This study explores the legal protections for holders of collateral against the loss of crypto assets as well as how crypto assets are governed by material guarantees in Indonesia. A conceptual and statutory approach, technical analysis, and a normative legal research methodology were applied in the study. The legal material was analyzed by using the content analysis approach, which involved examining the content and legality of the material gleaned from various laws and regulations by looking at the relevant legal precedents. The discussion results discover that crypto assets fall under the definition of "intangible movable objects" as defined in article 503 BW. In addition, crypto assets had material rights in the form of material guarantees in the form of a pledge and fiduciary guarantees, allowing the parties to carry out their agreements in good faith even in the event that the collateral object is lost. These disputes could be settled through either non-litigation or litigation.]]>
<![CDATA[Non-litigation as An Environmental Dispute Resolution Mechanism in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari]]>;
<![CDATA[Aditya Aji Syuhadha Ilmiawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Echaib Samira]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): Maret, 2022 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (234.164 KB)
|
DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v2i1.20756
<![CDATA[Environmental problems have occurred in the global scope, both developed and developing countries. Environmental problems are not only problems of developed countries or industrialized countries including Indonesia. Efforts to overcome environmental problems in developing countries have no other choice but to carry out development. Without the level of development, people will decline, and the environment will be increasingly damaged. Development must still be carried out without damaging the environment. This balance must be maintained in order to preserve the environment. Indonesia has been paying attention to environmental management since 1972. Settlement of environmental disputes through litigation does not produce many results. Dispute resolution through non-litigation channels assumes that dispute resolution through litigation results in very disappointing results. This study wants to conduct a study related to the implementation of Government Regulation No. 54 of 2000 concerning Service Providers for Environmental Dispute Resolution Services Outside the Court and find obstacles and solutions in resolving environmental disputes out of court. The implementation of Government Regulation No. 54 of 2000 at the central government level has established a service provider institution based on the Decree of the State Minister of the Environment Number 77 of 2003 concerning the Establishment of an Out-of-court Environmental Dispute Resolution Service Provider (LPJP2SLH) at the Ministry of the Environment, but its performance has not yet been felt. Abstrak Masalah lingkungan telah terjadi dalam lingkup global, regional maupun nasional baik negara maju maupun negara berkembang. Masalah lingkungan bukan hanya masalah negara maju atau negara industri namun juga pada negara berkembang termasuk Indonesia. Upaya mengatasi permasalahan lingkungan di negara berkembang tidak ada pilihan lain selain melakukan pembangunan. Pembangunan tetap harus dilakukan tanpa merusak lingkungan. Keseimbangan ini harus dijaga agar kelestarian lingkungan tetap terjaga. Indonesia telah memperhatikan pengelolaan lingkungan sejak tahun 1972. Penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan melalui litigasi tidak banyak membuahkan hasil. Penyelesaian sengketa melalui jalur non-litigasi didasarkan pada asumsi bahwa penyelesaian sengketa melalui jalur litigasi memberikan hasil yang sangat mengecewakan. Penelitian ini ingin melakukan kajian mendalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 54 Tahun 2000 tentang Penyelenggara Jasa Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Hidup di Luar Pengadilan, serta mencari kendala dan solusi penyelesaian sengketa lingkungan hidup di luar pengadilan. Pelaksanaan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 54 Tahun 2000 di tingkat pemerintah pusat telah membentuk lembaga penyedia layanan berdasarkan Keputusan Menteri Negara Lingkungan Hidup Nomor 77 Tahun 2003 tentang Pembentukan Layanan Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Di Luar Pengadilan Penyelenggara (LPJP2SLH) di Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup, namun kinerjanya belum optimal.]]>
<![CDATA[Juridical Review of Standard Clauses in Car Rental Agreements Based on Good Faith Principles ]]>
<![CDATA[Shavananda Shalsabilzahra H]]>;
<![CDATA[Herwastoeti]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): July 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i2.25361
<![CDATA[Rental agreements are usually made in writing in a standardized form, namely the content, form and closing have been standardized unilaterally by the business actor. This agreement is coercive and causes losses for the lessee and even an imbalance in the position between consumers and producers. This study aims to: (1) determine the contents of the standard clauses in the car rental agreement at Komando Rent a Car whether or not they are in accordance with the principle of good faith (2) to determine the legal consequences of including the standard clause in the car rental agreement at Komando Rent a car. The type of research used in this study is empirical juridical by using data collection techniques through interviews and literature studies. The results of the study show that: (1) the car rental agreement at Komando Rent a Car is not in accordance with the principle of good faith because there is a standard clause in the form of delegation of responsibility for business actors to the detriment of one of the parties, does not reflect a sense of justice and violates the law (2 ) the legal consequence of the inclusion of a standard clause which contains the transfer of responsibility for this business actor is that the agreement is null and void and can be subject to imprisonment and fines. Abstrak Perjanjian sewa biasanya dilakukan secara tertulis yang sudah dalam bentuk baku yaitu isi, bentuk serta penutupannya telah dibakukan secara sepihak oleh pelaku usaha. Perjanjian ini bersifat memaksa dan menimbulkan kerugian bagi pihak penyewa bahkan terdapat ketidakseimbangan posisi antara konsumen dan produsen. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui isi klausula baku pada perjanjian sewa menyewa mobil di Komando Rent a Car telah sesuai atau tidak dengan asas itikad baik (2) untuk mengetahui akibat hukum dari pencantuman klausula baku pada perjanjian sewa menyewa mobil di Komando Rent a Car. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) perjanjian sewa menyewa mobil di Komando Rent a Car tidak sesuai dengan asas itikad baik karena terdapat klausula baku berupa pelimpahan tanggung jawab pelaku usaha sehingga merugikan salah satu pihaknya, tidak mencerminkan rasa keadilan dan melanggar Undang-Undang (2) akibat hukum dari pencantuman klausula baku yang memuat pengalihan tanggung jawab pelaku usaha ini adalah perjanjian tersebut batal demi hukum dan dapat dikenai sanksi penjara dan denda.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Liability for Celebrities Promoting Goods Through The Instagram Platform ]]>
<![CDATA[Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari]]>;
<![CDATA[Devlita Almi Az Zahra]]>;
<![CDATA[Herwastoeti]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): November 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v3i3.32107
<![CDATA[This study aims to investigate the Legal Position of celebrities in promoting goods through the Instagram platform and the form of legal liability by celebrities for endorsements or advertised products. With a normative Legal method supported by statutory and conceptual approaches in the context of problem-solving, and Library Research, this research reveals that the legal position of celebrities holds no legal basis which specifically regulates the legal position of celebrities and no rules used and applied, resulting in a vacuum in norms. When a problem regarding endorsement with indications of products not in accordance with what is advertised emerges, this issue involves Liability based on fault. In such a case, the relevant form of liability where the celebgram is responsible for losses caused by mistakes contravening Article 4 letter h of Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection asserting that consumers are entitled to compensation, compensation and/or replacement if the goods and/or services received are not by the agreement or not as they should be. Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui tentang Kedudukan Hukum selebgram dalam mempromosikan barang melalui platform Instagram serta untuk dapat mengetahui tentang bentuk pertanggungjawaban hukum oleh selebgram atas endorsement atau produk yang diklankan. Metode penelitian yang dipakai adalah jenis Penelitian Hukum Normatif dengan metode pendekatan perundang-undangan (the statute approach), penelitian ini juga menggunakan pendekatan konseptual (the conceptual approach) yang digunakan dalam rangka pemecahan masalah, serta penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan (Library Research). Hasil penelitian yang didapat adalah Kedudukan hukum selebgram secara khusus ditegaskan bahwasanya tidak ada dasar hukum yang mengatur secara khusus mengenai kedudukan hukum selebgram dan belum memiliki aturan yang dipakai dan diterapkan akibatnya terjadi kekosongan norma. Ketika terjadi permasalahan mengenai endorsement dengan indikasi produk yang tidak sesuai dengan yang diklankan maka bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang dilakukan adalah Liability base on fault. Dimana dalam hal ini dapat dijelaskan bahwa Bentuk pertanggungjawaban yang relevan adalah dimana selebgram bertanggungjawab atas kerugian yang disebabkan oleh kesalahan yang dilakukannya terdapat dalam Pasal 4 huruf h UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen yang berbunyi konsumen berhak untuk mendapatkan kompensasi, ganti rugi dan/atau penggantian, apabila barang dan/atau jasa yang diterima tidak sesuai dengan perjanjian atau tidak sebagaimana mestinya.]]>
<![CDATA[Settlement of Land Plot Location Disputes Through Mediation: Case at Kediri Regency Land Office ]]>
<![CDATA[Rahmalia Pawestri]]>;
<![CDATA[Isdian Anggraeny]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): July, 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i2.35287
<![CDATA[A dispute over the location of a land plot is a dispute caused by confusion in the designation of land plots or boundaries. This dispute can cause losses for parties who have an interest in the land plot. Land dispute resolution, one of which is a dispute over the location of land parcels, can be resolved through non-litigation channels through mediation. Mediation as an alternative to dispute resolution is considered more profitable for the parties because it uses a win-win solution method. This research is an empirical juridical research, using primary and secondary data sources. The location of the research is at the Kediri Regency Land Office. The result of this study is the implementation of mediation at the Kediri Regency Land Office through several stages guided by Article 6 paragraph (1) of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency Number 21 of 2020 concerning the Handling and Settlement of Land Cases. The implementation of mediation at the Kediri District Land Office has obstacles including the parties to the dispute not being present at the time of mediation and having a bad faith. In this case, the solution that can be provided by the Kediri District Land Office is to advise the parties to resolve the dispute through litigation at the Kediri District District Court. Abstrak Sengketa letak bidang tanah merupakan sengketa yang disebabkan oleh kekeliruan dalam penunjukan bidang atau batas tanah. Sengketa ini dapat menyebabkan kerugian bagi pihak yang memiliki kepentingan atas bidang tanah tersebut. Penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan salah satunya sengketa letak bidang tanah dapat diselesaikan melalui jalur non litigasi melalui mediasi. Mediasi sebagai alternative penyelesaian sengketa dinilai lebih menguntungkan bagi para pihak sebab menggunakan metode win-win solution. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis empiris, dengan menggunakan sumber data primer dan sekunder. Lokasi penelitian berada di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kediri. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pelaksanaan mediasi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kediri melalui beberapa tahapan yang berpedoman pada Pasal 6 ayat (1) Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Nomor 21 tahun 2020 tentang Penanganan dan penyelesaian Kasus Pertanahan. Pelaksanaan mediasi di Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kediri memiliki hambatan diantaranya adalah para pihak yang bersengketa tidak hadir pada saat mediasi serta beritikad tidak. Dalam hal ini, solusi yang dapat diberikan oleh pihak Kantor Pertanahan Kabupaten Kediri adalah menyarankan kepada para pihak untuk menyelesaikan sengketa melalui jalur litigasi di Pengadilan Negeri Kabupaten Kediri.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Liability Of Inadvertent Customs Documents By Customs In Export Business ]]>
<![CDATA[Ayun, Qurrota]]>;
<![CDATA[Hapsari, Dwi Ratna Indri]]>
<![CDATA[ Simbur Cahaya Volume 31 Nomor 1, Juni 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Sriwijaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.28946/sc.v31i1.3647
<![CDATA[The purpose of this study is to investigate the legal consequences that exporters may face when an unintentional error occurs in customs clearance procedures carried out by the Customs. This research applies the normative juridical research method to analyze the legal liability of the Customs in the case of inadvertent customs documents, focusing on the provisions stipulated in PMK 274/PMK.04/2014. Data collection is done through a literature study using primary legal sources, especially related laws and regulations. Data were classified and analyzed normatively to understand the implementation and impact of Customs' legal liability. The results of the study provide an overview of the export duty restitution mechanism and aspects of the legal liability of Customs, focusing on export cancellation, overpayment, and the role of the Tax Court. This research is expected to contribute to a deeper understanding of the customs legal framework in Indonesia and can serve as a reference for relevant stakeholders.]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Penguatan Cagar Budaya pada Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Putri, Octavia Aresia]]>;
<![CDATA[Zahro, Maulidatuz]]>;
<![CDATA[Sholikhah, Mar’Atus]]>;
<![CDATA[Rahayu, Puji]]>;
<![CDATA[Marom, Nailul]]>;
<![CDATA[Riswantoro, Ganaudi]]>;
<![CDATA[Hapsari, Dwi Ratna Indri]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Journal: Kajian Hukum & Keadilan Vol 7 No 1 (2023): July ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Faculty of Law, University of Dr. Soetomo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25139/lex.v7i1.8909
<![CDATA[This study aims to analyze the juridical perspective on the cultural heritage protection regulation in Indonesia, particularly in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY). Employing a case study approach, this research explores the implementation of the Cultural Heritage Law in the context of DIY, as well as the efforts of the Yogyakarta Regional Government to strengthen and preserve cultural heritage amidst social polarization. The study also addresses challenges faced in preservation endeavors, such as limited resources and sustainable maintenance efforts. By analyzing juridical aspects and field practices, this research provides a richer understanding of the execution of the Cultural Heritage Law in DIY. Through community participation, DIY effectively manages to safeguard cultural heritage despite differences and societal polarization. The study yields an in-depth insight into the pivotal role of the Cultural Heritage Law and the efforts of the DIY Government in conserving cultural richness for future generations.]]>
<![CDATA[The Process of Dispute Resolution with Mediation in The Land Office of Batu City ]]>
<![CDATA[Sherin Adriani]]>;
<![CDATA[Salsabila, Firdina Nur Alfida Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Dwi Ratna Indri Hapsari]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2024): November, 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i3.37098
<![CDATA[The National Land Agency oversees government affairs in the land sector also has the authority to take administrative actions for resolving land disputes within its jurisdiction, playing a vital role in addressing land issues in Indonesia. According to the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian Affairs also Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia Number 21 of 2020, the BPN Kota Batu operates as a vertical agency under the National Land Agency also is directly accountable to the Minister through the Head of the Regional Office. This office serves as a mediator in local land disputes. The author conducts empirical legal research, including direct interviews with the Head of the Dispute Control also Handling Section at the BPN Kota Batu. Key issues examined involve the mediation process for resolving disputes also challenges encountered during mediation. Findings reveal that 1)the BPN Kota Batu adheres to proper procedures for mediation in line with applicable regulations, also 2)obstacles include 1)cooperation from the involved parties also 2)the mediator's capacity to facilitate dispute resolution effectively. Abstrak Badan Pertanahan Nasional mengawasi urusan pemerintahan di sektor pertanahan serta memiliki wewenang guna mengambil tindakan administratif dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tanah di wilayahnya, memainkan peran penting dalam menangani masalah pertanahan di Indonesia. Menurut Peraturan Menteri Agraria serta Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 21 Tahun 2020, Kantor Pertanahan Kota Batu beroperasi sebagai lembaga vertikal di bawah Badan Pertanahan Nasional serta langsung bertanggung jawab kepada Menteri melalui Kepala Kantor Wilayah. Kantor ini berfungsi sebagai mediator dalam sengketa tanah lokal. Penulis melakukan penelitian hukum empiris, termasuk wawancara langsung dengan Kepala Seksi Pengendalian serta Penanganan Sengketa di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Batu. Isu-isu kunci yang diteliti melibatkan proses mediasi guna menyelesaikan sengketa serta tantangan yang dihadapi selama mediasi. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa 1)Kantor Pertanahan Kota Batu mematuhi prosedur yang tepat guna mediasi sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku, serta 2)kendala yang dihadapi meliputi 1)kerja sama dari pihak-pihak yang terlibat serta 2)kapasitas mediator guna memfasilitasi penyelesaian sengketa secara efektif.]]>
