Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL IQTISAD: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia

NU dan Sumbangan Untuk Indonesia (Argumen-Argumen Ideologis Tentang Pidana Mati Pelaku Korupsi) Nazar Nurdin; Abu Hapsin
Iqtisad: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia Vol 7, No 2 (2020): Jurnal Iqtisad
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/iq.v7i2.3245

Abstract

Tujuan penulisan artikel untuk mengulas pendapat Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) tentang pidana mati bagi pelaku korupsi. Pada Musyawarah Nasional (Mubes) dan Konferensi Besar (Konbes) tahun 2012, para ahli hukum NU mencapai kesepakatan tentang kebolehan pelaku korupsi dijatuhi hukuman mati. Perbuatan korupsi tidak dikategorisasi sebagai hudud maupun kisas, melainkan takzir. Pendapat hukum tentang pidana mati diperbolehkan jika itu hukuman terakhir dan sesuai prinsip-prinsip kemaslahatan. Artikel ditulis dengan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif. Data utama adalah dokumen fatwa hasil sidang Mubes dan Konbes NU tahun 2012. Data dilakukan pengolahan, kompilasi dengan data pendukung lain, serta dilakukan analisis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa argumen-argumen ideologis tentang kebolehan pidana mati bagi pelaku korupsi melalui jalan takzir. Pidana mati yang dijatuhkan kepada pelaku korupsi diilhaqkan dengan hukum hirabah. NU berpendapat bahwa pidana mati diharapkan menjadi efek jera bagi siapa saja yang melakukan praktik korupsi. Fatwa ini setidaknya menunjukkan bahwa NU berani mengambil resiko dengan mencari dasar-dasar argumentasi hukum agama terkait hukuman maksimal, serta mendorong aparat pemerintah berani menjatuhkan hukuman yang berat bagi pelaku korupsi. Keyword: Korupsi; Pidana Mati; Nahdlatul Ulama; Takzir. Abstract The purpose of writing an article is to review the opinion of the Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) regarding the death penalty for corruption perpetrators. At the 2012 National Deliberation (Mubes) and Grand Conference (Konbes), NU legal experts reached an agreement on allowing corruption offenders to be sentenced to death. Corruption is not categorized as hudud or kisas, but takzir. The legal opinion regarding the death penalty is permissible if it is the final sentence and is in accordance with the principles of maslahat. Articles written with a qualitative descriptive approach. The main data is the fatwa document from the 2012 meeting of the Mubes and Konbes NU. The data is processed, compiled with other supporting data, and analysis is carried out. The result of the research shows that ideological arguments about the permissibility of capital punishment for corruptors take the takzir way. The death penalty imposed on the perpetrators corruption is related to the law of hirabah. NU is of the opinion that the death penalty is expected to be a deterrent effect for anyone who practices corruption. This fatwa at least shows that NU is brave enough to take risks by looking for the basis of religious law arguments regarding the maximum punishment, and encourages government officials to have the courage to impose harsh penalties for corruption perpetrators. Keyword: Corruption; Death Penalty; Nahdlatul Ulama; Takzir.
Islamic Political Law in Economic Warfare: Indonesian Economic Policy in the Global Economic Struggle Yayan Muhammad Royani; Nazar Nurdin
Jurnal Iqtisad Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Iqtisad
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/iq.v11i2.11345

Abstract

The era of globalization has shifted the form of military warfare to hybrid warfare involving economic warfare. The contribution of Islamic political law thinking is needed for Indonesia in addressing these issues. This paper is prepared using a qualitative-descriptive method. Data collection is done using desk research and annotated bibliography methods. Three approaches are utilized: textual-contextual, Islamic legal sociology, and comparative. The research results explain that Islamic Political Law is an instrument of political policy for Islamic countries in governance, including in both wartime and peacetime situations. For the Indonesian context, Islamic political law adapts to the development of the nation-state, where Indonesia is considered a state based on agreements or peace, positioning it similarly to Islamic countries. Therefore, Islamic political law thinking is currently needed in building civilization in the era of globalization, especially in dealing with new-style colonization or neo-colonialism. Islamic political law can contribute to the formulation of Indonesian economic policies in facing global economic warfare. The concept of "Indonesian Economic" refers to the result of ijtihad in Islamic political law in the economic field. Thus, a mechanism of synergy is needed for the values embedded in the Pancasila economic system and the Sharia economic system. The five basic principles of Islamic economic values, when synergized with the basic values of Pancasila, are applied in Indonesia, considering social, cultural, political, geographical, and all other aspects.